Moderator: Andrew
Brett wrote:Some interesting comments from Luke in the latest 'Fireworks':
Amongst the reasons for splitting up the band in 2008 (well he says 2006, but we know what he means) is that he 'wasn't getting on with the singer' and later he talks about how happy he is having JW back in the band:
'We had real success with Joe - he was another high school friend - Bobby was never a friend, he was just some oddball guy from Louisiana. It was hot and cold, sometimes good, sometimes really bad. I'm not going to bag on the guy, it was just something that didn't work anymore for me'.
ChickenStu wrote:So he blames the split of the band on not being able to get on with Kimball, says Kimball was "never a friend", refers to him as an "oddball guy from Louisiana" - and THEN says he's not going to bag on the guy? Wow. What would it be like if he DID decide to "bag" on him?
Mr Lukather, if you're reading this - I'm a huge Toto fan. Hearing the song "Roseanna" (Which both you and Kimball sing on) is my FIRST EVER MEMORY. Can't you see that it's kind of sad to read these kind of comments for someone like me? Come on man... I grew up with you dudes.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Thanks for taking the time to type out Luke's comments. Wish I had more insight into the band's dynamics. There was an apparent lack of chemistry between Luke and Bobby on-stage last time I saw them in the US. During the TOTO XX tour, I think the band wanted Joe back, but his voice wasn't up to it. Wish someone would just spill the beans already.
ChickenStu wrote:DracIsBack wrote:There seemed to be an apparent lack of chemistry between Bobby and everybody when I saw them in the Falling In Between tour. Loved the show, but he really didn't seem like he was part of the band.
Why do you suppose that was?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Bobby did SIX albums with these guys. To refer to him as some sort of random creole backwater hobo is a bit of a stretch. In the US, the TOTO hits that get regular rotation on classic rock radio are Hold the Line and I'll Be Over You and Roseanna and Africa. As much as I love Pamela and Can't Stop Loving You, I have NEVER once heard them played. Bobby deserves more respect. Joe is loved by die-hards in the same way Steve Augeri is by Journey fans. Truthfully tho, his impact on the band overall is nil. Same as Fergie or JMB. If Luke wants to schmuck around and have fun with his "high school buddies", he should do what everyone else does - go set-up a class reunion on Facebook.
lordreo wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Bobby did SIX albums with these guys. To refer to him as some sort of random creole backwater hobo is a bit of a stretch. In the US, the TOTO hits that get regular rotation on classic rock radio are Hold the Line and I'll Be Over You and Roseanna and Africa. As much as I love Pamela and Can't Stop Loving You, I have NEVER once heard them played. Bobby deserves more respect. Joe is loved by die-hards in the same way Steve Augeri is by Journey fans. Truthfully tho, his impact on the band overall is nil. Same as Fergie or JMB. If Luke wants to schmuck around and have fun with his "high school buddies", he should do what everyone else does - go set-up a class reunion on Facebook.
Seriously? You compare the influence of JMB to the influence Joseph had? I'm not saying Bobby didn't have a big influence on the band and their style, but if things don't work on a personal Level why should a band go on? If they are happy with Joseph and Bobby is happy with his band then why change anything?
By the way, over here they actually play "I'll be over you". Granted, not as much as "Africa" or "Hold the Line", but they do play it
ChickenStu wrote:Andrew wrote:Luke doesn't hold any issue with Bobby.
If this is Mr Lukather "not holding an issue" with someone, I'd hate to be the one on the business end if he did!
ChickenStu wrote:Wow. If that's the case and has always been the case then why was Kimball bought back for the Mindfields album? This is what I don't get...
WalrusOct9 wrote:I imagine Sony had a hand in that. Kingdom of Desire & Tambu are great albums, and did okay, but weren't massive successes. After they dug through the vaults for Toto XX and did a couple of promo shows, I imagine they decided it was water under the bridge and it'd be best for the band to have a real singer instead of Luke singing the whole album. Lots of factors. You don't have to be best friends with someone to be in a band with them, at least for a few years.
DracIsBack wrote:WalrusOct9 wrote:
THough not sure it's fair to suggest Luke isn't a 'real singer'.
WalrusOct9 wrote:DracIsBack wrote:WalrusOct9 wrote:
THough not sure it's fair to suggest Luke isn't a 'real singer'.
I always like Luke's voice on the first 7 (and last few) Toto albums. I also like the way he's gotten a bit more raspy and a deepened tone with age. He's a perfectly fine singer, and the songs he did on Toto records were always very well suited for him. But he's also a bit one-dimensional as a vocalist (as is Paich, which is why the rotating singers concept worked so well for the band). Kingdom Of Desire, especially...he has some good vocal moments but other tunes he just sort of shouts his way through, where a full-time singer might've taken a bit more nuanced approach. There's singers (say, Peter Gabriel or Steve Perry) who I could listen to for hours straight, and guys like Luke, who have their sweet spot musically, but I tire a bit on a full album. The music & guitar playing is more important to me, but I do miss the multiple singers.
TotoFan77 wrote:Everything needs to stay the way that it is. I am LOVING the current version of Toto and the 2012 setlist was the best setlist since the 80's. Everyone seems really happy and I hope it stays that way.
Joe Vana wrote:Well....Walrus....with ALL respect....Luke IS a REAL singer....he is FAR from a one dimensional singer....and "full time singer"????? huh???....what????....the guy does over 100 live shows a year....sings a TON....and is a Pro's Pro....the guy has sung hits as ballads, and rockers....so there goes the one dimensional theory....If you want to talk technique, lets....I am well versed....but as far as being one dimensional, or not a "full time" singer....well...enough of that....
Joe Vana wrote:WalrusOct9 wrote:DracIsBack wrote:WalrusOct9 wrote:
THough not sure it's fair to suggest Luke isn't a 'real singer'.
I always like Luke's voice on the first 7 (and last few) Toto albums. I also like the way he's gotten a bit more raspy and a deepened tone with age. He's a perfectly fine singer, and the songs he did on Toto records were always very well suited for him. But he's also a bit one-dimensional as a vocalist (as is Paich, which is why the rotating singers concept worked so well for the band). Kingdom Of Desire, especially...he has some good vocal moments but other tunes he just sort of shouts his way through, where a full-time singer might've taken a bit more nuanced approach. There's singers (say, Peter Gabriel or Steve Perry) who I could listen to for hours straight, and guys like Luke, who have their sweet spot musically, but I tire a bit on a full album. The music & guitar playing is more important to me, but I do miss the multiple singers.
Well....Walrus....with ALL respect....Luke IS a REAL singer....he is FAR from a one dimensional singer....and "full time singer"????? huh???....what????....the guy does over 100 live shows a year....sings a TON....and is a Pro's Pro....the guy has sung hits as ballads, and rockers....so there goes the one dimensional theory....If you want to talk technique, lets....I am well versed....but as far as being one dimensional, or not a "full time" singer....well...enough of that....
I will say this....I am friends with all involved, so I will be a bit vague.....BUT....I see a lot of shit slung on here....with obvious bias....I work/write with TD, just did a full album with him that was received very well, I have worked and sung alongside Luke, Bobby and the gang.....and the misrepresentation of things on here is amazing....it sounds alot like guys who have taken sides, have an axe to grind...the LAST thing BK or LUKE wants is a shit storm on here about 4 year old shit, or people's agenda getting mixed up with facts....with that being said anybody can post whatever they want.....BUT....how about rational debate about things.....since we are discussing a band which has pedigree like none other on heret....these guys are the "players players"...simple....name your band on here that has had a better pedigree of musicianship and I will pay the next bill...I guess I ask this selfishly because I would love to be active in this forum, but a shit storm always ensues....maybe I am asking for too much...who knows....
Have a great day.....JV
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests