Moderator: Andrew
Thenightbull wrote:I say yes. What does everyone else say?
Jodes wrote:And we are still awaiting Dennis's album to be released in the USA..
Any bets it gets put off til the summer since single #2 TANKED in Canada?
Jodes wrote:Yes, I'm pretty sure not only Froy, but Suite and a few others said that Save Me was officially released as Single #2 back in the fall..
Jodes wrote:And we are still awaiting Dennis's album to be released in the USA..
Any bets it gets put off til the summer since single #2 TANKED in Canada?

Jodes wrote:It charted here?
Must be Quebec again, because I heard a Crapload of Xmas music (new and old) and DDY's track wasn't one of them..

Jodes wrote:It charted here?
Must be Quebec again, because I heard a Crapload of Xmas music (new and old) and DDY's track wasn't one of them..

StyxCollector wrote:New songs? Maybe, but they need another delivery vehicle. Given the tone of recent interviews, I get the sense JY wants to do new material more than Tommy.
I'm not sure if they still have a deal with New Door/Uni, but if they attempt to do an album, they'd do better recording it themselves and releasing it on their own.
Although they need stronger material than the songs they released on OWE. Those were pretty weak for the Styx canon.

brywool wrote:They were decent songs. "Everything All the Time" was great. Why don't you like that one Alan?
styxfanNH wrote:
I would have to say that if they believe that only their core fans are going to buy the album, then they might as well write and record a ton of stuff and release it through their website and iTunes. Their core fans already go there and they will be able to cut out the record companies and major advertising. They could actually sell a cd for $10 and make tons of profit - proportional to a label.

bugsymalone wrote:styxfanNH wrote:
I would have to say that if they believe that only their core fans are going to buy the album, then they might as well write and record a ton of stuff and release it through their website and iTunes. Their core fans already go there and they will be able to cut out the record companies and major advertising. They could actually sell a cd for $10 and make tons of profit - proportional to a label.
Didn't someone post here that Tommy was building a recording studio? If so, I would think that it is not just for show, but he actually plans on recording in it. So it is possible they will self-produce something there. My guess is, looking at the new dates that will bring in even more $$, it will be state-of-the-art.
Bugsy
styxfanNH wrote:I would have to say that if they believe that only their core fans are going to buy the album, then they might as well write and record a ton of stuff and release it through their website and iTunes. Their core fans already go there and they will be able to cut out the record companies and major advertising. They could actually sell a cd for $10 and make tons of profit - proportional to a label.
shaka wrote:Recording at home now is a viable alternative to recording in a commercial studio. With all the experience of Styx I doubt they will have much trouble coming up with a good sounding do-it-yourself record.

Thenightbull wrote:I say yes. What does everyone else say?

sadie65 wrote:I agree Styx should sell via their website. I guess I just wonder how this double standard works. Previously, when Dennis was doing that it was deemed unacceptable by some here. Now don't get me wrong, I think any artist who wants to make and promote new music should investigate their options and use whatever means they feel will work best for them. BUt why is it a valid option for one and not the other? Serious question there, not meant as a flame. Am I missing something?

stabbim wrote:styxfanNH wrote:I would have to say that if they believe that only their core fans are going to buy the album, then they might as well write and record a ton of stuff and release it through their website and iTunes. Their core fans already go there and they will be able to cut out the record companies and major advertising. They could actually sell a cd for $10 and make tons of profit - proportional to a label.
Agreed. Not only is this the path they ought to take now, but IMO it's one they should have started upon years ago. Might be a bit late to capitalize on it as fully at this point, but it's still better than a) waiting in vain for the mainstream music business to sort itself out, or b) giving up making new music altogether.
shaka wrote:Recording at home now is a viable alternative to recording in a commercial studio. With all the experience of Styx I doubt they will have much trouble coming up with a good sounding do-it-yourself record.
Damn straight. The bulk of 7DZ was recorded at the S.H.O.P. (a decade ago, no less) and it's one of the best-sounding albums TS has ever made.
sadie65 wrote:I agree Styx should sell via their website. I guess I just wonder how this double standard works. Previously, when Dennis was doing that it was deemed unacceptable by some here. Now don't get me wrong, I think any artist who wants to make and promote new music should investigate their options and use whatever means they feel will work best for them. BUt why is it a valid option for one and not the other? Serious question there, not meant as a flame. Am I missing something?

sadie65 wrote:BUt why is it a valid option for one and not the other? Serious question there, not meant as a flame. Am I missing something?

stabbim wrote:sadie65 wrote:BUt why is it a valid option for one and not the other? Serious question there, not meant as a flame. Am I missing something?
Because there are folks who, in course of waging this silly little war of theirs, will take any opportunity to criticize the "other side" for any reason, whether it makes any sort of logical sense or not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests