Moderator: Andrew
Cassie May wrote:Always loved the song, but thought the video was nuts. Had nothing to do with the story of the song. Actually, I never understood how the song fit into the whole Kilroy thing, anyway, as it seemed more like a love song than anything else.
Baron Von Bielski wrote:I think it would have been a hit as well on the charts... definitely top 20. It's odd that TS pushed so hard for a song to get released then that he doesn't even play today. You'd think that since he thought so much of it then that it'd be in the Styx set nowadays.
Toph wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:I think it would have been a hit as well on the charts... definitely top 20. It's odd that TS pushed so hard for a song to get released then that he doesn't even play today. You'd think that since he thought so much of it then that it'd be in the Styx set nowadays.
Tommy DIDN'T push for this song to be released. He decided after hundreds of thousands had been spent on the video (and probably after a few shots and lines) that the band should NOT release HWBHB as a single and instead release some live version of "Cold War". The record company balked at that and so they ended up releasing "High Time" which DDY said, "was probably the worst song of the entire album." Just through the momentum that the album had, HT went to #48, but there was little promotion from the record company, no video, and it was a substandard song. Imagine if HWBHB HAD been released with a video promoting it. A much more radio friendly song - would have scored well at both Pop and AC and given Kilroy 3 more months of action and maybe the impetus for a 4th single (JGTTN edited or Double Life?). Alas, yet another boneheaded moved cost them there.
You know, for all the flack DDY gets about being "controlling". It sure seems to me that TS had the band by the balls when it came for decisions about what singles to release. First Time - Tommy threatens to quit and they release substandard Why Me instead. No Boat on the River released in the US. The HWBHB debacle. Why they let Tommy get his way on these and inherently take the wind out of the sales of both Cornerstone and Kilroy, I have no idea.
Monker wrote:Toph wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:I think it would have been a hit as well on the charts... definitely top 20. It's odd that TS pushed so hard for a song to get released then that he doesn't even play today. You'd think that since he thought so much of it then that it'd be in the Styx set nowadays.
Tommy DIDN'T push for this song to be released. He decided after hundreds of thousands had been spent on the video (and probably after a few shots and lines) that the band should NOT release HWBHB as a single and instead release some live version of "Cold War". The record company balked at that and so they ended up releasing "High Time" which DDY said, "was probably the worst song of the entire album." Just through the momentum that the album had, HT went to #48, but there was little promotion from the record company, no video, and it was a substandard song. Imagine if HWBHB HAD been released with a video promoting it. A much more radio friendly song - would have scored well at both Pop and AC and given Kilroy 3 more months of action and maybe the impetus for a 4th single (JGTTN edited or Double Life?). Alas, yet another boneheaded moved cost them there.
What is boneheaded is people thinking they can write an alternate history and improve things, and not be doing anything but writing fiction.
Kilroy had run its course...Cornerstone had run its course....EOTC had more then run its course. Just because those albums were not as successful as some would have liked does not mean a fictional rewriting of history would change anything with any certainty.You know, for all the flack DDY gets about being "controlling". It sure seems to me that TS had the band by the balls when it came for decisions about what singles to release. First Time - Tommy threatens to quit and they release substandard Why Me instead. No Boat on the River released in the US. The HWBHB debacle. Why they let Tommy get his way on these and inherently take the wind out of the sales of both Cornerstone and Kilroy, I have no idea.
Both "Cold War", "Haven't We Been Here Before" and even "Kiss Me Hello" were all about Tommy being unhappy, controlled, wanting to leave, and actually leaving, Styx. Ironic how you pick such a song to pick on and then make the above statement.
"First time" is mediocre.
"Why Me" is mediocre.
"Boat ont he River" is laughable as a US single.
Maybe if Dennis treated Styx like a band Kilroy itself would not have been a debacle that tore the band apart. The third single was irrelevent...."Mr Roboto" had sealed the album as a shark jumping excercise.
And, the band doesn't release singles, the label does....unless they owned A&M , "Styx" did not release the singles.
ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Toph wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Its not on YouTube. Go ahead and put your copy out there. Cause it ain't there.
Toph wrote:Monker wrote:Toph wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:I think it would have been a hit as well on the charts... definitely top 20. It's odd that TS pushed so hard for a song to get released then that he doesn't even play today. You'd think that since he thought so much of it then that it'd be in the Styx set nowadays.
Tommy DIDN'T push for this song to be released. He decided after hundreds of thousands had been spent on the video (and probably after a few shots and lines) that the band should NOT release HWBHB as a single and instead release some live version of "Cold War". The record company balked at that and so they ended up releasing "High Time" which DDY said, "was probably the worst song of the entire album." Just through the momentum that the album had, HT went to #48, but there was little promotion from the record company, no video, and it was a substandard song. Imagine if HWBHB HAD been released with a video promoting it. A much more radio friendly song - would have scored well at both Pop and AC and given Kilroy 3 more months of action and maybe the impetus for a 4th single (JGTTN edited or Double Life?). Alas, yet another boneheaded moved cost them there.
What is boneheaded is people thinking they can write an alternate history and improve things, and not be doing anything but writing fiction.
Kilroy had run its course...Cornerstone had run its course....EOTC had more then run its course. Just because those albums were not as successful as some would have liked does not mean a fictional rewriting of history would change anything with any certainty.You know, for all the flack DDY gets about being "controlling". It sure seems to me that TS had the band by the balls when it came for decisions about what singles to release. First Time - Tommy threatens to quit and they release substandard Why Me instead. No Boat on the River released in the US. The HWBHB debacle. Why they let Tommy get his way on these and inherently take the wind out of the sales of both Cornerstone and Kilroy, I have no idea.
Both "Cold War", "Haven't We Been Here Before" and even "Kiss Me Hello" were all about Tommy being unhappy, controlled, wanting to leave, and actually leaving, Styx. Ironic how you pick such a song to pick on and then make the above statement.
"First time" is mediocre.
"Why Me" is mediocre.
"Boat ont he River" is laughable as a US single.
Maybe if Dennis treated Styx like a band Kilroy itself would not have been a debacle that tore the band apart. The third single was irrelevent...."Mr Roboto" had sealed the album as a shark jumping excercise.
And, the band doesn't release singles, the label does....unless they owned A&M , "Styx" did not release the singles.
You are so full of shit Monker. You need to actually read history. Everything I've said is backed up by numerous interviews. Styx was the top band on the A&M roster, don't tell me that they didn't have input. So, get your head out of your ass and stop pushing you agenda...
Cassie May wrote:Toph wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Its not on YouTube. Go ahead and put your copy out there. Cause it ain't there.
YouTube (or whomever) must have pulled it fairly recently, as I watched it on there maybe a few months ago. Also noticed "Rockin' The Paradise" is no longer there. Used to be, you could watch RTP on MTV or Vh1 sites, but it's not there anymore, either.
Not to ignite any wars, but doesn't the label decide what to release as a single? That was how I always thought it worked. I thought that the act may have input, but the label has the final decision. Or maybe the decisions are in each acts' contracts? I really don't know, I'm just asking.
Monker wrote:Cassie May wrote:Toph wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Its not on YouTube. Go ahead and put your copy out there. Cause it ain't there.
YouTube (or whomever) must have pulled it fairly recently, as I watched it on there maybe a few months ago. Also noticed "Rockin' The Paradise" is no longer there. Used to be, you could watch RTP on MTV or Vh1 sites, but it's not there anymore, either.
Not to ignite any wars, but doesn't the label decide what to release as a single? That was how I always thought it worked. I thought that the act may have input, but the label has the final decision. Or maybe the decisions are in each acts' contracts? I really don't know, I'm just asking.
Ultimately, the label decides. Some bands have more influence then others over what singles are released. They, band and label, probably work with some John Kalodner type AOR person to decide on singles.
For videos, if Tommy did not like the video and he was in it, I'm pretty sure he has rights to not have it released because it has him image in it. So, the label could spend a billion dollars on a 5 minute video and Tommy could have it axed because he didn't like how his hair was combed.
You're right about the video thing--when Tommy filmed his original video for "Girls With Guns," for example, he did not like the final product--it was very glossy, very 80s-production (what he was trying to get away from), and A&M let him scrap it and film the B&W version. Still, I scratch my head over HWBHB and Music Time. How could anyone have thought those were any good?
Monker wrote:Toph wrote:Monker wrote:Toph wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:I think it would have been a hit as well on the charts... definitely top 20. It's odd that TS pushed so hard for a song to get released then that he doesn't even play today. You'd think that since he thought so much of it then that it'd be in the Styx set nowadays.
Tommy DIDN'T push for this song to be released. He decided after hundreds of thousands had been spent on the video (and probably after a few shots and lines) that the band should NOT release HWBHB as a single and instead release some live version of "Cold War". The record company balked at that and so they ended up releasing "High Time" which DDY said, "was probably the worst song of the entire album." Just through the momentum that the album had, HT went to #48, but there was little promotion from the record company, no video, and it was a substandard song. Imagine if HWBHB HAD been released with a video promoting it. A much more radio friendly song - would have scored well at both Pop and AC and given Kilroy 3 more months of action and maybe the impetus for a 4th single (JGTTN edited or Double Life?). Alas, yet another boneheaded moved cost them there.
What is boneheaded is people thinking they can write an alternate history and improve things, and not be doing anything but writing fiction.
Kilroy had run its course...Cornerstone had run its course....EOTC had more then run its course. Just because those albums were not as successful as some would have liked does not mean a fictional rewriting of history would change anything with any certainty.You know, for all the flack DDY gets about being "controlling". It sure seems to me that TS had the band by the balls when it came for decisions about what singles to release. First Time - Tommy threatens to quit and they release substandard Why Me instead. No Boat on the River released in the US. The HWBHB debacle. Why they let Tommy get his way on these and inherently take the wind out of the sales of both Cornerstone and Kilroy, I have no idea.
Both "Cold War", "Haven't We Been Here Before" and even "Kiss Me Hello" were all about Tommy being unhappy, controlled, wanting to leave, and actually leaving, Styx. Ironic how you pick such a song to pick on and then make the above statement.
"First time" is mediocre.
"Why Me" is mediocre.
"Boat ont he River" is laughable as a US single.
Maybe if Dennis treated Styx like a band Kilroy itself would not have been a debacle that tore the band apart. The third single was irrelevent...."Mr Roboto" had sealed the album as a shark jumping excercise.
And, the band doesn't release singles, the label does....unless they owned A&M , "Styx" did not release the singles.
You are so full of shit Monker. You need to actually read history. Everything I've said is backed up by numerous interviews. Styx was the top band on the A&M roster, don't tell me that they didn't have input. So, get your head out of your ass and stop pushing you agenda...
You're an idiot who doesn't even understand what you yourself posted, and quoted.
YOU said, " It sure seems to me that TS had the band by the balls when it came for decisions about what singles to release."
I said NOTHING about influence...and neither did you. You were implying that Styx released the singles. The LABEL does the releasing...not the band. Well, at least not back then. Now you are going about in your usual trollish behavior and using misdirection to try change a clarification that I was making into an argument I am NOT making.
I know the history. What you are writing is a revision of history because you do not like the fact of how those albums sold.
Monker wrote:Cassie May wrote:Toph wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Its not on YouTube. Go ahead and put your copy out there. Cause it ain't there.
YouTube (or whomever) must have pulled it fairly recently, as I watched it on there maybe a few months ago. Also noticed "Rockin' The Paradise" is no longer there. Used to be, you could watch RTP on MTV or Vh1 sites, but it's not there anymore, either.
Not to ignite any wars, but doesn't the label decide what to release as a single? That was how I always thought it worked. I thought that the act may have input, but the label has the final decision. Or maybe the decisions are in each acts' contracts? I really don't know, I'm just asking.
Ultimately, the label decides. Some bands have more influence then others over what singles are released. They, band and label, probably work with some John Kalodner type AOR person to decide on singles.
For videos, if Tommy did not like the video and he was in it, I'm pretty sure he has rights to not have it released because it has him image in it. So, the label could spend a billion dollars on a 5 minute video and Tommy could have it axed because he didn't like how his hair was combed.
Cassie May wrote:Monker wrote:Cassie May wrote:Toph wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:How much trouble did you go through to find the video? It's commercially available, on the Caught in the Act DVD release...
Its not on YouTube. Go ahead and put your copy out there. Cause it ain't there.
YouTube (or whomever) must have pulled it fairly recently, as I watched it on there maybe a few months ago. Also noticed "Rockin' The Paradise" is no longer there. Used to be, you could watch RTP on MTV or Vh1 sites, but it's not there anymore, either.
Not to ignite any wars, but doesn't the label decide what to release as a single? That was how I always thought it worked. I thought that the act may have input, but the label has the final decision. Or maybe the decisions are in each acts' contracts? I really don't know, I'm just asking.
Ultimately, the label decides. Some bands have more influence then others over what singles are released. They, band and label, probably work with some John Kalodner type AOR person to decide on singles.
For videos, if Tommy did not like the video and he was in it, I'm pretty sure he has rights to not have it released because it has him image in it. So, the label could spend a billion dollars on a 5 minute video and Tommy could have it axed because he didn't like how his hair was combed.
You're right about the video thing--when Tommy filmed his original video for "Girls With Guns," for example, he did not like the final product--it was very glossy, very 80s-production (what he was trying to get away from), and A&M let him scrap it and film the B&W version. Still, I scratch my head over HWBHB and Music Time. How could anyone have thought those were any good?
Toph wrote:You don't know shit, asswipe. You are so full of shit it is unbelievable. You are a troll that gets on these forums to stream your ignorance. If the band had no fucking influence on singles, then how come Shaw was able to personally stop First Time from being released? How was he able to stop, yes, stop HWBHB from being released despite the fact that over 100,000 had been made on the making of a video?
Go fuck yourself Monker, you are a waste of time.
ManOfMiracles wrote:You're right about the video thing--when Tommy filmed his original video for "Girls With Guns," for example, he did not like the final product--it was very glossy, very 80s-production (what he was trying to get away from), and A&M let him scrap it and film the B&W version. Still, I scratch my head over HWBHB and Music Time. How could anyone have thought those were any good?
Well, that's easy to explain. People have opions. And if you can not like them, others can simply like them anyway. AND they may not be able to understand how anyone could NOT like them. Funny how that works.
Toph wrote:The fact that this video never saw the light of day and the single was never released goes down as one of Styx's top 5 boneheaded moves. The fact that they went through all that expense and made such a intriguing video would have eased them through a very painful time a bit better. As one member said, "There's no deodorant like success." This would have undoubtedly been the third top 10 off the album and given it much more life. But one member's haphazard decision making caused this never to be released to major video stations or as a single. Yet another missed opportunity. So, this gets ranked way up there because it was such a unique video and such a departure from Styx. Had a tough time finding this one.....
http://video.mail.ru/bk/vav1959/10921/10962.html
Monker wrote:ManOfMiracles wrote:You're right about the video thing--when Tommy filmed his original video for "Girls With Guns," for example, he did not like the final product--it was very glossy, very 80s-production (what he was trying to get away from), and A&M let him scrap it and film the B&W version. Still, I scratch my head over HWBHB and Music Time. How could anyone have thought those were any good?
Well, that's easy to explain. People have opions. And if you can not like them, others can simply like them anyway. AND they may not be able to understand how anyone could NOT like them. Funny how that works.
I think what she is saying "What's there to like?"
I think Music Time is all around pathetic. The original GWG video is cheesy....but so is the song itself, so it didn't really make much difference to me one way or another.
sniper16 wrote:are you sure this wasnt released, i remeber seeing it on friday night videos or night flight maybe, maybe it was released later
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests