just fulfilling their contract with wooden nickel or did it just happen that way?
Sorry to bug you guys just a little bored here

Moderator: Andrew
gr8dane wrote:In those days it wasn't unusual for bands to record 2 albums a year.
An album would be about 30-40 minutes long.
They would make an album in a week to a month.
Tour that album for maybe 4 to six months and then back in the studio to record,
and then tour that album.
I think that was pretty much the norm then.
gr8dane wrote:In those days it wasn't unusual for bands to record 2 albums a year.
An album would be about 30-40 minutes long.
They would make an album in a week to a month.
Tour that album for maybe 4 to six months and then back in the studio to record,
and then tour that album.
I think that was pretty much the norm then.
masque wrote:gr8dane wrote:In those days it wasn't unusual for bands to record 2 albums a year.
An album would be about 30-40 minutes long.
They would make an album in a week to a month.
Tour that album for maybe 4 to six months and then back in the studio to record,
and then tour that album.
I think that was pretty much the norm then.
perfectly said.......when you check release dates for several bands in those days you will see similar frequency of releases.....bands like styx, kansas, kiss to name but a few.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests