Isn't It Ironic

by **swwskj** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:33 am

Wow!!! Now even the ladies are going at it. Certainly can't say this place is boring. And to think I was coming for the buffet all along.

Scott

by **Zan** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:39 am

bugsymalone wrote:Oohh. Did I hurt someone's feelings with the winky/smiley? I guess I ran so fast I just ended up right here, again.

So sorry. I think instead of the movie and the pills, I will just cry in my beer.

Note -- no emoti-faces here. No dancing banana either.

UM...ok. No, you didn't "hurt my feelings." I made a comment that I see a lot of victims here, period. YOU made it into being about wanting to jump off a cliff or something. You're not being singled out here, but you sure seem mighty defensive.

No matter. You continue doing what you do, and that'll be fine. But if it doesn't bother you how you come across at times, why should it bother you to hear about it? I'm not looking for an apology, so you can spare us the sarcastic woefullness. I just made an observation, and if that irritates you, well, maybe that's something worth exploring. If it isn't, then don't sweat it, babe. I'm sure an opportunity to rag on Gowan's voice will be just around the corner, and all will be right again.

I'll give the banana a rest for this one too, so we're speaking the same language. LOL (no really, it is funny!)

by **bugsymalone** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:39 am

You know what? I was leaning to the dark side there. Need to get OFF that!

I am headed out to see the "A New Hope for the Return of the Phantom Clone But Gotta Wade Through All This Sith First" movie with some good friends.

Then we are going to eat Mexican food and drink some margaritas.

Andrew?! Stick a fork in this one. It is DONE.

Bugsy

by **Zan** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:42 am

swwskj wrote:Wow!!! Now even the ladies are going at it. Certainly can't say this place is boring. And to think I was coming for the buffet all along.

You're just jealous that you weren't asked to hold the video camera.

by **Zan** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:44 am

sadie65 wrote:Semantics eh? Okay...I'm sure you've participated in watching American Idol. Surely you aren't alone there. And yet...how many awful singers do you all subject yourself to in watching it. Rather a large victim group...perhaps a little masochistic as well

masochistic, maybe. ;-)

But in my world, there's a difference between a victim and a volunteer. I don't know how many people here know the difference when they get caught in that "THEY always pick on US" mode.

I think it's easy to tell who the instigators are here, even when they aren't the "usual suspects."

by **Guest** » Sat May 28, 2005 3:46 am

Zan wrote:
I think it's easy to tell who the instigators are here, even when they aren't the "usual suspects."[/color][/b]

Now if that ain't the pot calling the kettle black...

by **classicstyxfan** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:14 am

Am I too late to offer to provide the Jello or the Mud for the Cyber-Chick fight ????

by **sadie65** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:17 am

classicstyxfan wrote:Am I too late to offer to provide the Jello or the Mud for the Cyber-Chick fight ????

What flavor for the jello ?

Mud...nah...there's too much of it being slung around here to have any left for the cyber match.

by **Adam** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:21 am

Not to beat this dead horse, butl, I'm compelled to point out that the ratio of Zan's antagonistic posts to those of ItsMyLife is about
Zan: 1 to IML: 20.

The insults flow awfully easy and often for some, while others hold back a while between lobbing their grenades.

by **Adam** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:22 am

Me? My record is sadly too often negative...I'm TRYING here people!

by **sadie65** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:36 am

Adam wrote:Not to beat this dead horse, butl, I'm compelled to point out that the ratio of Zan's antagonistic posts to those of ItsMyLife is about
Zan: 1 to IML: 20.

The insults flow awfully easy and often for some, while others hold back a while between lobbing their grenades.

While there are definitely insults and grenades being lobbied, I also think that perception of what's being said, versus what is actually being said plays a role. I don't limit it to the people you mention. I mean by everyone, myself included.

There are posts made to get a negative reaction. And then there are those that are sincere, and still they get attacked. I suppose it's because the written word doesn't necessarily convey the tone of emotion all the time.

by **swwskj** » Sat May 28, 2005 4:46 am

At least no one has been called a Cheekless pant wearing, Horsey sauce slathering, Reach around giving Urinal Cake in a while.

Scott

by **classicstyxfan** » Sat May 28, 2005 5:08 am

"At least no one has been called a Cheekless pant wearing, Horsey sauce slathering, Reach around giving Urinal Cake in a while."

- Scott

You are right about that Scott......but could it be possible that persons latest ego IS HERE AMONG US ??? as you recall, that persons entire reason for being here was to antagonize......there are those here today who seem to have similar motives...... :?:

Oh , and as a side note, and I may be wrong about this, but I dont think there are many here who could do justice to those cheekless pants or slathered in Horsey sauce ! :shock:

by **styxfanNH** » Sat May 28, 2005 5:14 am

Oh , and as a side note, and I may be wrong about this, but I dont think there are many here who could do justice to those cheekless pants or slathered in Horsey sauce !

I hope this is not a contest

MR

Isn't It Ironic

Who is online