Moderator: Andrew
I know Tommy's a touraholic and all that, but wow, to just jump in with DY after all this touring with Styx---that would just blow my mind. The guy has more energy than me, that's for sure!
JY did not want anyone hearing Gowan in 5.1 that would have clinched it
for sure. AX that idea
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:froy says:JY did not want anyone hearing Gowan in 5.1 that would have clinched it
for sure. AX that idea
LOL![]()
What does the 5.1 mean? I never got that.
Zan wrote:SuiteMadameBlue wrote:froy says:JY did not want anyone hearing Gowan in 5.1 that would have clinched it
for sure. AX that idea
LOL![]()
What does the 5.1 mean? I never got that.
5.0 was used to refer to Styx without DDY. Gowan, Shaw, JY, Sucherman, Burtnik. 5.1 was any 5.0 show with Chuck.
AX is "AXE."
.5.0 was used to refer to Styx without DDY. Gowan, Shaw, JY, Sucherman, Burtnik
AX is "AXE."
5.1 is the setting on a DVD 5.1 Dolby Digital
I don't know what Zan is blabbin about ,
5 speakers plus the 1 sub woofer
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:Zan says:.5.0 was used to refer to Styx without DDY. Gowan, Shaw, JY, Sucherman, Burtnik
Why? Who "coined" this phrase, someone from a message board or the band. I really never paid attention to this until I went back and read posts and saw it again.
AX is "AXE."
Sorry, but I can't stop laughing. If anyone has anytime, go back and read the old posts like on page 18 and 17. Those are funny posts. And how everyone used to fight on here and the funny comments. It's almost like the Journey board now, but just a little tamer.
I'm not actually sure where it originally came from. All I know is that there came a point when I had to ask too because I was reading it so much. You had 1.0, which was pre-Tommy, 2.0 = glory Styx, 3.0 = with Burtnik on lead, 4.0 = with Todd on drums, then 5.0 with Gowan.
I don't know what Froy's babbling about.
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:Okay, I thought there were all these goofy versions. Is 6.0 with Ricky now - LOL And then the 2006 version will be 7.0? LOL
I don't know what Froy's babbling about.
That's why I was laughing about going back to the old pages. FUNNY stuff!!! You won't get a migrane, just a stomach ache from laughing.
Zan wrote:OK. I went back and read spme old posts frpm page 17, and I found one funny POST (singular) by Yogi about JY's finances. Everything else was more of the same tired crap we still bicker about today (from the same people); only you, Suite, seem much less bitter now.
One person's bicker...another person's stomach ache.
bugsymalone wrote:One person's bicker...another person's stomach ache.
Another person's "I just cannot go back there again!"![]()
Bugsy
OK. I went back and read spme old posts frpm page 17, and I found one funny POST (singular) by Yogi about JY's finances. Everything else was more of the same tired crap we still bicker about today (from the same people); only you, Suite, seem much less bitter now.
I know that. I was talking about Styx 5.0, 5.1 and also it's mentioned 6.0, I just don't get these little codes they started to use - LOL
See, it'd just be easier if we called them Styx
Of course, that would just kill some people to do, for fear of being misinterpreted as suddenly being ok with the new lineup.
ek88 wrote:I know that. I was talking about Styx 5.0, 5.1 and also it's mentioned 6.0, I just don't get these little codes they started to use - LOL
See, it'd just be easier if we called them Styx![]()
Of course, that would just kill some people to do, for fear of being misinterpreted as suddenly being ok with the new lineup.
jrnyman28 wrote:As others have mentioned, A Shaw/Blades, Damn Yankess, Styx, Night Ranger tour would be really cool. Sadly, I purposely put NR as the headliner over Styx. I think they would now be the bigger draw...
Monker wrote:
If it did, DY should close - BECAUSE THEY ARE THE SUPERGROUP!
Rock'ndeano wrote:Monker wrote:
If it did, DY should close - BECAUSE THEY ARE THE SUPERGROUP!
I just got done calling you smart on the bigger board, and you make this lame comment. DY a supergroup? Come on Monker.
Monker wrote:Rock'ndeano wrote:Monker wrote:
If it did, DY should close - BECAUSE THEY ARE THE SUPERGROUP!
I just got done calling you smart on the bigger board, and you make this lame comment. DY a supergroup? Come on Monker.
What I mean by that is THEY are the band that borrows members from all of the others. It's a 'supergroup' in the same way that Bad English is.
Besides, if DY reunited, they would instantly be bigger then either Styx or NR...simply because of Ted Nugent. I mean, Ted's ego is big enough for both of those bands combined. I can't imagine a tour like this happening without DY closing.
I don't think there is any question that Damn Yankees owes 100% (ok, 98%) of its popularity to Ted Nugent. Had he not been in the group, I do not see that group doing anything in CD sales or concert tickets.
It's Jack and Tommy that made the group.
My understanding is that the last time thy proposed a triple bill -NUGENT, STYX, NIGHT RANGER that would have a DY reunion during Nugents set fell through because STYX"s and NUGENT's lawyers could not come to terms with the money split and Nugent wanted STYX and His band to trade off the headlineing spots each night and JY was insisting that STYX should be the headliner. If I'm not remembering this correctly I'm sure some of you will correct me.
As far as Damn Yankees headlining a bill with Nugent Solo and STYX on the bill - Never happen, too many egos involved in the STYX and Nugent camp. Just my opinion (But I Think I'm Right!)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests