Moderator: Andrew
DarrenUK wrote:The Republicans in congress insisted on an extra $100m in tax breaks for the companies for the bill to pass ....... Pork for Paulson
yogi wrote: By the way Zan we republicans need more supporters like you.
NOT!!

Zan wrote:yogi wrote: By the way Zan we republicans need more supporters like you.
NOT!!
Funny, I think the same about you.
Zan wrote:Rockwriter wrote:Palin actually did better than I thought she would, but that's not saying much. She DID, however, continue in her tradition of trying to disguise the fact that she can't or won't answer certain questions by simply giving canned boilerplate about McCain being a maverick, no matter what the actual question was. As a journalist myself, that grates on my nerves something fierce. The question was, here are your perceived Achilles heels; do you think that's right or wrong, and what is your REAL Achilles heel? Biden gave a tame answer but at least answered, but Palin . . . she didn't even attempt to answer the question, and instead gave a long scripted commercial as an answer. The whole time she was talking I was thinking, "Did you even listen to the question?" There were points in there where it seemed like you could have asked, "What's two plus two?" and she would have said, "John McCain is a maverick, always taking shots from his own party, as well as obviously the other party, but always willing to get in there and roll up his sleeves and get the work done no metter who gets the credit." That drives me nuts. It's just a smokescreen, and if she were Vice President it would not serve her well at all. She is simply unprepared for this. And her false folksiness is not suitable for the job either. All that "heck" and "gosh" and "darn right" stuff is reminiscent of Naomi Judd. In order to succeed as VP you have to be a serious person capable of sitting across a negotiating table from world leaders. I keep picturing Sarah Palin across from Vladimir Putin saying, "You're darn tootin', Mr. Putin". LOL. That's not exactly what we need. We've already had a woefully inarticulate president for the past eight years.
Sterling, I can honestly say that of all the things I've ever read that you've written, this is my absolute favorite.
She did the same thing when the topic moved to gay rights - tho thankfully didn't go into a Maverick speech again. She just completely ignored the question at hand and started ranting about the sanctity of marriage again. Not the sharpest crayon in the box.
I am also disappointed that her barbaric wolf track record wasn't brought to question.
P.S. I'm not a journalist, and she annoyed the snot out of me.
Of course, I also think she's the anti-christ, but I can still separate the two!
elmotano wrote:yogi wrote:Here are the choices:
Choice A: We elect a guy who may hate white people, and wants everyone to earn $44,250 per year.
Choice B: One step away from becoming the most powerful person in the free world sits a iamraisingaknockedup teenagermom go to www.iamraisingaknockupteenagermom.com for more details.
Sorry, I meant, one step away from becoming the most powerful person in the free world sits: Hockey Mom. Does she even know what the duties of the President are???
As for Biden and facts??? he wouldnt know a fact if it shot him in the ass. Biden sounds great. The problem is half the shit he spews is 100% fiction. He has ALWAYS done this.
For me the only real choice is McCain, butt..... he is older than Keith Richards & Mick Jager combined, which easily could bring us back to iamraisingaknockedupteenagermom.
We are better than this!!
Then again, we are replacing the worst president in the history of the US.
Just curious, do you have any real facts that show Obama hates white people? I haven't seen it. And I do know for fact that he is not Muslim, not that this should matter. We are not at war with Muslims, we are at war with extremists. And, maybe to add some fuel to this, Barak is actually a Hebrew word, that means blessing.
classicstyxfan wrote:Much like Putin over the skies of Russia, ignorance rears its ugly head here.....
a small percentage of people who claim to be islamic use terrorism to advance their agenda, and this makes everyone in a religon of near 1 billion people non-peaceful.
Ever hear about the "Christians" and a liitle thing called the Crusades ???? I'm sure Jesus was all for that !
Mankind has a long history of a select group of people doing horrendous things in the name of their religon.........
kci2509 wrote:
Just out of curiousity....isn't barack obama half white??? I do believe he is of mixed ethnicity, so to say he hates white people, well, I think that's a little far out there. Wouldn't that mean he hates his own mother?

kci2509 wrote:
Just out of curiousity....isn't barack obama half white??? I do believe he is of mixed ethnicity, so to say he hates white people, well, I think that's a little far out there. Wouldn't that mean he hates his own mother?


Rockwriter wrote: What frightens me is how America is currently being run by a lunatic fringe element of Christianity that is every bit as deranged as the people they purport to oppose.
Sterling
stmonkeys wrote:yeah, he was raised by his mom and maternal grandparents who most definitely were white. stop trying to interject some SENSE into this conversation!!!!
oh... and add to the crusades the spanish inquisition and holocaust. (if we're going to keep score)
chowhall wrote:stmonkeys wrote:oh... and add to the crusades the spanish inquisition and holocaust. (if we're going to keep score)
You were doing fine until you brought up the holocaust. Adolf Hitler was not espousing Christianity in the Holocaust. Adolf Hitler was espousing Adolf Hitler. Christianity was guilty of neglect in the Holocaust and maybe even enabling, but not the root cause.

Zan wrote:I'm with ya on the rest, tho. I find it strangely amusing how Christianity (which I don't oppose) has become the poster child for purity and goodness, when in fact, it is responsible for some of the most barbaric behavior our history has ever seen. [/color][/b]
chowhall wrote:Religion has been and will continue to be the Number one cause of wars. (Not just Christianity though)

chowhall wrote:Rockwriter wrote: What frightens me is how America is currently being run by a lunatic fringe element of Christianity that is every bit as deranged as the people they purport to oppose.
Sterling
Run America? Just what is your point? I expected better from you.
chowhall wrote:Zan wrote:I'm with ya on the rest, tho. I find it strangely amusing how Christianity (which I don't oppose) has become the poster child for purity and goodness, when in fact, it is responsible for some of the most barbaric behavior our history has ever seen. [/color][/b]
Religion has been and will continue to be the Number one cause of wars. (Not just Christianity though)
Rockwriter wrote:chowhall wrote:Rockwriter wrote: What frightens me is how America is currently being run by a lunatic fringe element of Christianity that is every bit as deranged as the people they purport to oppose.
Sterling
Run America? Just what is your point? I expected better from you.
My point is that for the last eight years America has been saddled with a President and administration founded on some very extreme quasi-Christian principles that are actually a gross distortion of the true teachings of Jesus Christ. Bush has said privately that he believes that God ordained him to preside over America - which in large part explains his arrogance, as well as his lack of intellectual curiosity. He has taken the position that he does not need to consult or engage in any kind of informed debate or discovery process, much to his own detriment and the detriment of the country as a collective. And why not? Because his fundamental belief is that since God guides him, he cannot be wrong and therefore needs no information. That isn't faith. That is delusion.
Speaking of expecting better, about 75% of Americans expected better from this administration. Since in America the majority rules, is it your position that in this instance the majoroty is wrong about Bush having been a disaster? I don't mean that as an attack, just asking for a clarification of your position.
I hope all is well.
Sterling

LordofDaRing wrote:Sounds like some of you are beefing up your resume to join MSNBC or at least the View. Rather than joining the media/hollywood bashing of Sarah Palin and questioning her qualifications as a Vice President, I wish someone could point out Obama's positive traits as a leader, commander in chief, manager of any budget whatsoever. A perfect question to put to him during a debate would be, "Mr. Obama please tell use why you are more qulified than your opponent....without using the words "Change" or mentioning the Bush Administration oh, and please be specific". It might be helpful to question some of Joe Biden's points from a factual point too. By the way, don't go to Joebiden.com to validate that, try checking the true voting records, which are on some website, not controlled by either party.
Despite whoever comes on top, I think if any congressional investigations come out of this economic bail out, some of you might be a little suprised as to what names get tied into the wrong doings.
I have to admit, Tina Fey has found a new career. SNL has always been pretty good with their political humor.

LordofDaRing wrote:Sounds like some of you are beefing up your resume to join MSNBC or at least the View. Rather than joining the media/hollywood bashing of Sarah Palin and questioning her qualifications as a Vice President, I wish someone could point out Obama's positive traits as a leader, commander in chief, manager of any budget whatsoever.

yogi wrote:Like I stated in my first post here, Barack wants everyone making $ 44,254 dollars per year. Later on, Barack will allows us to drive our subcompact car to the government run health facility, or we gather to listen to his spiritual advisor Dr. Jeremiah Wright.
It's scary to think who may be leading us.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests