Moderator: Andrew
If and I mean If Suite knew about the name of the venue and chose not to post it, so what.
And, I did not imply or state that Suite and Froy are in some weird union. If they wish to exchange vows of partnership, it's irrelevant to me and I wasn't even considering the thought.
Why do you worry about why I am here? I was here first ya know, nya, nya.
sadie65 wrote:Now that was comical. We both know there were some really nasty things said back in 1999 and 2000. And yes, Monker's words, on this board, were not necessary and a form of blasting.
I don't necessarily view it as hypocritical per se, but only because of the name recognition issue. I do however, think that if you/they/anyone can get a gig they want to play, by all means, I think they should go for it. Life is just too short not to.
Oh and I'm a fan of Fogelberg too. Seriously hope he is soing well with his illness.

bugsymalone wrote:JUST when you think that the worst of all posts come from Froy, along comes Monker to make us all see that, indeed, there is MUCH worse out there.
I find it nearly impossible to believe that someone with no sense of humor at all can actually exist, but darned if you don't prove me wrong every time, Monker.
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:LOL...I guess if that's blasting, then it's no wonder you feel there was serious bashing going on on both sides back in the day. Or you must have been reading different boards that I was. lol
No, it's not you Zan. There are 2 people on here that I don't really care for their posts. One of them I know personally and came on as a different name and posts to bash me once in a blue moon.
I was trying to be a little funny with the "threat" and having a field day with the different venues.

And just where did I say in my post you bashed Dennis? I said you bashed Suite. Hardly the same thing.
No you said that if it were an articcle about Styx she wouldn't have hesitated and Froy would have jumped on it. Guess what, Froy jumps on nearly everything. And Suite has posted several nice things about the band as well.
For you to sugges that she withheld this simply because it of some double standard, well that's conjecture, like I said before.
You said, "Now that was comical. We both know there were some really nasty things said back in 1999 and 2000. And yes, Monker's words, on this board, were not necessary and a form of blasting. " Which I took to mean what I said here in the PAST was bashing...But, it looks like you changed thoughts in the middle of a paragraph and I misunderstood.
YOU JUST AGREED WITH ME and you don't even want to see it. I know froy jumps on everything. I've dealt with him for over ten years. I know Suite sometimes posts 'good' things from Styx.
But, the bottom line is she said "I knew it ws just a matter of time before this was posted here..." meaning that she KNEW about it and did NOT post it herself. If it had been about Styx I have no doubt that she would have posted...and just as YOU said, froy would have jumped all over it Then somebody would have argued back, then somebody would have said something else. Whatever.
What I am trying to point out is that it is hypocritical to try nip the sarcasm aimed at Dennis when those same people have NO PROBLEM aiming that sarcasm at Styx.
I did NOT suggest a motive. But, since you are suggesting one for me, I'll say what *I* think. I would think there was a bit of an embaresment factor going on because of supporting Dennis, and the fact that she has gone on about this 'corn festival' thing for what seems like years. So, I think there are some hefty reasons for her to NOT post it, and not very many for why she should...and besides, she knew somebody else would post it eventauly.
The way I remember it, nobody who supported the new line up of Styx said anything nasty about Dennis until Dennis (and his fans) starting saying (and doing) nasty things about and to them. I know, even if you didn't start it, you're just as guilty. I guess. LOL
I agree with the last bit. Although, I distinctly remember some DeYoungians back in the day saying, and I quote, "Dennis could fill Madison Square Garden by himself."
But, the bottom line is she said "I knew it ws just a matter of time before this was posted here..." meaning that she KNEW about it and did NOT post it herself.
Oh, I know you! You always post the informative stuff! I just thought maybe there were some other boards you frequented that I did not, as I have no memory of Styx 5.0 fans initiating any flame wars about Dennis (or very few- there were a couple of anonymous troll-likes that popped up every now & then).
Wonder why you have no doubt. I do. There have been several articles over the past years that were not necessarily flattering to the band, and I know she didn't post them on the boards. Her reasons for posting/not posting something are hers.
ADAM: Perhaps we're all TIME KILLING IDIOTS here, but I'm not convinced both 'sides' are being equally hypocritical...
When JY starts wearing an obvious wig, I'll jump in right alongside the 'DeYoungians', however, it still seems blatantly obvious that moves made by Styx which were deemed UNACCEPTABLE, UNPROFESIONAL, UNDIGNIFIED and SOMETHING DENNIS WOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED THE BAND STOOP TO are now suddenly acceptable. Cute even. For DeYoung.
Dennis long ago released an album of covers and now plays casinos and hogfests. And you know what? I don't believe THERE'S EVER BEEN ANYTHING WRONG WITH DOING SO! But boy, did the DeYoungians once.
(And again, I maintain it's the elitist nature of the DDY camp - which I suggest comes from trickle down - that invites this current finger pointing & shouts of "LOOK AT YOU NOW!" from the Styx supporters)
sadie65 wrote:With Dennis in the band, as Styx, it's doubtful they would play these venues. It's also doubtful they would have toured again.


Perhaps we're all TIME KILLING IDIOTS here, but I'm not convinced both 'sides' are being equally hypocritical...
When JY starts wearing an obvious wig, I'll jump in right alongside the 'DeYoungians', however, it still seems blatantly obvious that moves made by Styx which were deemed UNACCEPTABLE, UNPROFESIONAL, UNDIGNIFIED and SOMETHING DENNIS WOULD NEVER HAVE ALLOWED THE BAND STOOP TO are now suddenly acceptable. Cute even. For DeYoung.
Okay, now I think we're losing perspective here. One more time I'll say it. With Dennis in the band, as Styx, it's doubtful they would play these venues. It's also doubtful they would have toured again. As a solo artist rebuilding his career, Dennis is playing the same venues as Styx. Nothing hypocritical in what was said. They are two seperate animals. Why is that so hard to grasp? However, I can see where, if you don't look at those points, you would find the comments hypocritical. I honestly can.
Dennis long ago released an album of covers and now plays casinos and hogfests. And you know what? I don't believe THERE'S EVER BEEN ANYTHING WRONG WITH DOING SO! But boy, did the DeYoungians once.
The DeYoungians, as well as the bathwater Drinkers have all made comments and assumptions that were out of line, way out of line. The key word in your phrase is once. On this board, I've seen tremendous strides made by just about everyone to be a lot more tolerant and accepting. I believe I have said on numerous occasions, by rehashing the past, it never resolves it, changes peoples' opinions, and basically just frustrates those involved.
And I find that remark ridiculous. There are several so called DeYoungians on this board who do not fall anywhere near what an elitist is. You continue to spout that word, and voice your opinion about how "we"call him a hero, or at least you have on other posts. Trust me, "we" have all acknowledged that he isn't our hero, and lord knows I've said often enough the man screwed up. Funny how you don't acknowledge that.
Zan wrote:sadie65 wrote:With Dennis in the band, as Styx, it's doubtful they would play these venues. It's also doubtful they would have toured again.
THANK YOU. Also, THANK YOU FOR ACKNOWLEDGING that people *did* say that Dennis, with or without Styx, would have never stooped to the level of playing the types of shows Styx was playing and could have filled places like Madison Square Garden on his own - seeming to forget how Styx's popularity as a whole had dwindled substantially after 1983 and it's easier to fill large venues when you're playing 20-25 shows a year. I understand emotions were high, etc., but some of us are curious what those highly emotional folks think now.
classicstyxfan wrote:Are the " DeYoungians" some kind of cult ????? kinda sounds like a good name for a cult to me.
Would I recognize a group of them if I were in an airport![]()
I don't think we should let any "DeYoungians" have any Kool-aid at their gatherings, that seems like a really bad idea![]()
![]()

quote="Adam"]A good portion of what I post is knee jerk reaction to Froy.
Either you're part of the solution or you're part of the problem. I just can't help but think Froy only getting busted by a few of us Pro-Styx 5.2 types and NOT by the Pro-Dennis caucus suggests being part of the problem, or worse.
Now, I admit, things HAVE become better, slightly more tolerant with some. But as long as there's a Froy insurgency, the new kinder, gentler regime will appear a failure.
To be fair, my practice of busting Froy whenever inspired is feeding the fire - hence I guess this makes me part of the problem, which some of you cooler heads will point out from time to time. But as long as there's a guy posting on a Styx board how awful Styx is, why SHOULDN'T there be a personality or two like me to counter them?
(I know I know. Because it's a futile exercise)
As far as the excuse that the entire 'class of venue' issue is apples & oranges because Dennis is sort of embarking on a 'new' solo career versus Styx being an established brand name, I get the point, but I still don't give a flying you know what. Blaming an act for THE VENUE THEY PLAY seems to me like blaming VanGough for dying a pauper - WHAT THE HELL DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH THEIR ART?
Maybe I'm older than you guys. Maybe by the time you started going to rock concerts they were nice neat little exercises in capitalism. But Jimi Hendrix played $hitholes and the Beatles didn't have decent sound systems and it rained cats and dogs on Woodstock. SO WHAT? It's the music and the performance that matter - the LIVING BREATHING MOMENT, not some status oriented measurement of upper class values.
I say it's FINE for ANY Goddam artist to play wherever the hell there's an audience who wants to hear them and that's that. I refuse to judge an act by the bathrooms of the venue - it's not their responsibility!
If you ask me there is absolutely nothing inherently cool about a "shed". Call me anti-elitism, I just have always been irked by that perspective.
I hope Dennis kicks the audience's ass. Nothing wrong with it, even though Froy (and possibly Dennis) may be privately hanging their heads in some silly "shame" over it.
I just can't help but think Froy only getting busted by a few of us Pro-Styx 5.2 types and NOT by the Pro-Dennis caucus suggests being part of the problem, or worse.
I do believe several here have challenged him, called it as we see it, and still it doesn't change. That we recognize the futility of this does not by any stretch mean we condone it. Surely you can recognize that you are lumping people together because they don't react the same way you do.

Adam wrote:I'm enjoying the volley, sadie, but it sounds like you blame artists for not being popular. Oooch. I got a big old major problem with that (if that's what you mean).
Nope not what I mean at all. I mean, that in the final analysis, it is society that dictates what is popular. I cannot stand reality tv, hoever, it is the popular choice for today. Doesn't make it right, but it is "reality".I think greatness usually has very little to do with popularity.
And if popularity is a measurement of quality, than break out the Ashlee Simpson CDs and let's watch that pinnacle of artistic television, "The Apprentice"!
I fully agree. I stand by my statement thought, that artists are responsible for where they choose to perform. Nothing more, nothing less.(It was popular once to be racist too once.)
Sadly, in many parts of the world, it still is.Yes, you might get judged on where you live, who you associate with, what you do for a living, etc., but A) That don't make it right and B) I feel absolutely compelled to point out that it's wrong and stupid to do so.
I agree. I'm merely trying to point out that reality is often the negator to moral rightiousness. People will almost always do that which they somehow makes them better. The whole idea of "celebrity" is absurd. Yet people glom on to the idea that because someone is in the public eye their words and actions are somehow so much more than what they really are. And so, people judge their lives by ridiculous benchmarks.I hope Dennis is laughing (I can't help but doubt it) but I sure know Froy aint.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests