Moderator: Andrew

Rockn'deano wrote:Care to wager?
Rockn'deano wrote:Dude, Hillary is a helluva lit tougher, smarter and more saavy then Kerry, Edwards or Obama.
Rockn'deano wrote:She will have a shitty economy to run on, an embarrassing war to run on, a terrible American reputation to run on.

Rockn'deano wrote:It's one thing to vote for the war, but voting for the war, doesn't mean condoning a buffoon attempt at managing the war. how the Hell was she to know, that W would fuck it up so bad?

Monker wrote:
Oh, gee, I don't know...
Maybe because W. is an idiot.
Anybody with a brain the size of froy's would know Iraq was going to be screwed up from the beginning. All the patriotic, political, BS that was being thrown about at that time was ridiculous. Anybody against taking out Sadam was a traitor. He was supposed to be some kinda modern day Hitler with a 'nucular' bomb...not some bum in a spider hole who couldn't hold an army together for five minutes.
She only voted for attacking Iraq because, at the time, it was the PC thing to do...EVERYBODY, Republican and Democrat, did the same. Hardly ANYBODY had the balls to stand up and say it was the wrong thing to do.
That should tell you how fucked up government is - The most powerful nation in the world can't tell the difference between a peon and a Hitler. Give me a break.
Monker wrote:
She only voted for attacking Iraq because, at the time, it was the PC thing to do...EVERYBODY, Republican and Democrat, did the same.
Monker wrote:
She only voted for attacking Iraq because, at the time, it was the PC thing to do...

DarrenUK wrote:Migraine for me at least you can go and lie down when you get one of them....stomoch virus your running to the John every 5 minutes...

Zan wrote:This is the most idiotic debate I've ever seen. It's like comparing a stomach virus to a migraine and justifying why each one is better to have.

Rockn'deano wrote:Zan wrote:This is the most idiotic debate I've ever seen. It's like comparing a stomach virus to a migraine and justifying why each one is better to have.
I am surprised at this comment. I always thought highly of your posts Zan, and to me, what can possibly be wrong with a debate?
Oh, and if it's so inaccurate, why don't you jump in and tell us all what is right. Nothing like a person criticizing the trying members, yet won't add to the discussion.

gr8dane wrote:Maybe this ehh debate needs a little input from the brainchild behind this fine topic .

Zan wrote:
2. This is a STYX board. It was never meant to BE a political debate board.[/color][/b]

Rockn'deano wrote:Zan wrote:
2. This is a STYX board. It was never meant to BE a political debate board.[/color][/b]
Ah. I was waiting for this one to come out.
I was afraid at first to respond to this at first, however, a REGULAR STYX POSTER started it, and what's the difference if there is 1 reply, or 382? A thread is a thread is a thread.
For the record Zan, I think you might be one of the few people on here who I would never flame...and also, I am very passionate in arguing, however, I always learn something from the other side in the heat of battle....so debate is healthy in my humble opinion.


Rockn'deano wrote:In your opinion. I have seen some people make some good points.
I don't understand why some people don't like these threads, but can't skip over them.
Again, not flaming you, Zanster.




sadie65 wrote:Zan wrote:When did this happen?
I'm so glad you were elected Zan

Much like I am associated with the Journey board, froy is linked to the Styx Board.
DarrenUK wrote:Migraine for me at least you can go and lie down when you get one of them....stomoch virus your running to the John every 5 minutes...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests