Page 1 of 2
Worst Replacement Singers

Posted:
Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:00 pm
by Ash
Who is the worst "replacement" singer in rock history? Forget their talent playing an instrument, I'm thinking just about singing ability in comparison to the guy they replaced. Vote. I tried to include as many as I could think of.

Posted:
Mon Dec 08, 2008 8:50 pm
by Hollywood
In my mind Paul Rodgers does not fit Queen.

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:02 am
by Zan
That was as many as you could think of? lol
I think you should have a "best of" poll as well.
For example, as much as love Peter Gabriel (and I really do), I think Phil Collins was a fantastic replacement.

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:31 am
by Ash
Zan wrote:That was as many as you could think of? lol
I think you should have a "best of" poll as well.
For example, as much as love Peter Gabriel (and I really do), I think Phil Collins was a fantastic replacement.
What can I say - it was 3:30am when I made the poll. I did the best I could


Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:30 am
by stmonkeys
you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 4:46 am
by yogi
No one in that entire band can sing.
I hate the Replacements.
Why would you even start an Assembly Line about them??
How about worst Boomtown Rat singers, no..... worst Dead Kennedy singers.

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:46 am
by Ehwmatt
Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
Re: Worst Replacement Singers

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:15 am
by froy
Ash wrote:Who is the worst "replacement" singer in rock history? Forget their talent playing an instrument, I'm thinking just about singing ability in comparison to the guy they replaced. Vote. I tried to include as many as I could think of.
Easy answer
Garry Lowan

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:17 am
by froy
Zan wrote:That was as many as you could think of? lol
I think you should have a "best of" poll as well.
For example, as much as love Peter Gabriel (and I really do), I think Phil Collins was a fantastic replacement.
Just answer the damn question

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 7:17 am
by froy
yogi wrote:No one in that entire band can sing.
I hate the Replacements.
Why would you even start an Assembly Line about them??
How about worst Boomtown Rat singers, no..... worst Dead Kennedy singers.
So Yogi says Gowan also..

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:31 pm
by Ash
stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:10 pm
by froy
Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
Can I vote 2wice?

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 1:11 pm
by froy
Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
Paul Rogers was great with Queen
Awesome concert

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:59 pm
by Zan
Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
You didn't specify "replacement of original singer" in the poll. I think Cherone would get my vote too, but I voted for Boston.

Posted:
Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:08 pm
by Ehwmatt
froy wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
Paul Rogers was great with Queen
Awesome concert
It'd probably be a decent live show, but the material they produced SUCKED. I've got a couple of local favorites and even some people here on MR.com that write far better material.

Posted:
Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:18 am
by froy
Zan wrote:Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
You didn't specify "replacement of original singer" in the poll. I think Cherone would get my vote too, but I voted for Boston.
Even though you know deep down Gowan is the worst of all time..

Posted:
Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:06 pm
by MCM
Zan wrote:Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
You didn't specify "replacement of original singer" in the poll. I think Cherone would get my vote too, but I voted for Boston.
Poor Tommy DeCarlo.. I think he suffered from "lack of frontman ability" more than inablility to sing. I saw them towards the end of the summer tour and he did improve from the beginning of the tour (I only saw YouTube's from the beginning of the tour) it didn't appear to me that he was comfortable on stage. Poor guy also had to compete with Michael Sweet. As much as I enjoyed the show I still felt bad for him at points.
The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name. That tour was so bad that here in Pgh they curtained off half of the Civic Arena because ticket sales were so bad.

Posted:
Wed Dec 10, 2008 1:24 pm
by Rick
Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
I agree totally with this post. My vote went to PR as well. Not a good fit for Queen. I would have loved to have seen JSS front that band.

Posted:
Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:13 pm
by stmonkeys
george michael SHOULD have fronted queen instead of paul rogers.

Posted:
Wed Dec 10, 2008 5:49 pm
by Hollywood
stmonkeys wrote:george michael SHOULD have fronted queen instead of paul rogers.
Totally! When he did 'Year Of '39' at the tribute I thought I was going to lose it. He's a total trainwreck of a person and I have never liked any of his own work, but he would have been perfect.
Paul Rodgers is such an egomaniac, and it works brilliantly in his work, but it does not translate to Queen very well.

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:13 am
by froy
stmonkeys wrote:george michael SHOULD have fronted queen instead of paul rogers.
Thank God that did not happen
Instead of tie your mother down it would have been tie your brother down
Re: Worst Replacement Singers

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 12:55 am
by froy
Ash wrote:Who is the worst "replacement" singer in rock history? Forget their talent playing an instrument, I'm thinking just about singing ability in comparison to the guy they replaced. Vote. I tried to include as many as I could think of.
The Boston singer is not part of this poll
He did not replace Brad he took over for him
Same with Paul Rogers
You can't replace a dead person .
So take all those votes and give them to Gowan.

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:37 am
by yogi
' You cant replace a dead person'
What does that mean???????
Death counts!!!!!
P.S. The George Michael 'Tie Your Brother Down' was pretty funny
Still..... Death Counts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:21 am
by Zan
MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:18 am
by froy
yogi wrote:' You cant replace a dead person'
What does that mean???????
Death counts!!!!!
P.S. The George Michael 'Tie Your Brother Down' was pretty funny
Still..... Death Counts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do not replace a dead person
You take over for him..
Dead does not count..
Gowan wins even bigger now..

Posted:
Thu Dec 11, 2008 7:19 am
by Ash
Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
Yep... forgot about that one.

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 1:45 am
by LordofDaRing
I remember Fleetwood Mac tried several people to fill in for Lyndsey Buckingham and Christine McVie on different tours. Billy Burnett, and Dave Mason come to mind. I like Dave Mason, we just disagree is a great song. But nobody in my mind can replace LB, especially his unique guitar playing.
Ugh, how bout McKenzie Philips on that ill fated Mamma's and Poppa's tour several years ago.
Cherone gets my vote too, wrong voice for that band.

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:11 am
by MCM
Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
That's him, so memorable I couldn't even remember his name.

Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:47 am
by Zan
MCM wrote:Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
That's him, so memorable I couldn't even remember his name.
LOL...I only know who he is because he did a double-bill with Glen Burtnik in Atlanta this past October. He was actually VERY good. And the guitarist he had with him was sensational. They were a bit like Shaw-Blades, only edgier and with more tats & eyeliner. lol
See?
|
|
v


Posted:
Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:44 am
by MCM
Zan wrote:MCM wrote:Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
That's him, so memorable I couldn't even remember his name.
LOL...I only know who he is because he did a double-bill with Glen Burtnik in Atlanta this past October. He was actually VERY good. And the guitarist he had with him was sensational. They were a bit like Shaw-Blades, only edgier and with more tats & eyeliner. lol
See?
|
|
v
Hah, that's funny, more tats and eyeliner. Maybe I'll have to look into his music a little. I only remember that tour. See how one show can give you a bad impression.
Do you live in Atlanta? I used to go down there visiting friends as lot, a fun city!