conversationpc wrote:ohsherrie wrote:A perfect example: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=3625465
Dan Rather Sues CBS for $70 Million
The Former News Anchorman Claims CBS Made Him 'a Scapegoat'
The suit, filed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan, claims that CBS and its executives made Rather "a scapegoat" in an attempt "to pacify the White House."
Rather says in his suit that Redstone made it clear that a Bush victory would be good for Viacom and that it was "important to Vicacom to have good relations with the Oval Office."
He was talking about this on the View yesterday. He said that the huge corporations that own the networks are more interested in garnering favor, and therefore favors, from the administration than reporting the truth.
Rather has a long history of hatred against the Bush family. He was made the "scapegoat" because, in this case, he has four legs, hoofs, fur, and a billy goat beard.
You don't like to argue with me, remember? I told you I'd leave you alone but if you're going to respond to my posts you can hardly expect me to ignore it. Does this mean you've changed your mind? It's not as if Dan was the first or only person to look into this. He was just the most visible and well known person who worked for one of the big corporations who were more worried about special favors than news.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... 4Feb2.html
"In 2000, the Boston Globe examined a period from May 1972 to May 1973 and found no record that Bush performed any Guard duties, either in Alabama or Houston, although he was still enlisted.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/artic ... _at_guard/
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicsel ... vice_x.htm
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature ... d_records/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2004 ... 463&page=1
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/ ... 33717.html