Moderator: Andrew
mikemarrs wrote:i think it makes both dirk diggler and john holmes both look like mere mortals.

Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?

Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
Lady Luck wrote:Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
I missed it, but with that comment, I can just imagine what it was.

Rockindeano wrote:Lady Luck wrote:Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
I missed it, but with that comment, I can just imagine what it was.
Fear not my Florida sister, he grew it back overnight.

StoneCold wrote:stevek2007 wrote:piecesofeight wrote:Can't miss it now..I believe the whole sig is 'bigger'
Hope no one's kiddies are lookin' when you are..
I think it's funny....but as much as I like the dude's contributions to the place (unlike others, I've got nothin against the guy), I can't say it's appropriate for a site that's not filtered against kids surfin...
While I see your point, if a kid's got access to the net without active adult supervision, you can't stop them from stumbling across stuff anywhere. This has always been a NSFW site anyway (which equals NSFK).
The "adults only" warning on this thread would've been like an invitation for me when I was a kid.![]()
Strange, Odd, Rude, Sexy or Funny (Adults Only)
http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/vie ... hp?t=20328
Let me contribute to the festivities.![]()


Rockindeano wrote:Lady Luck wrote:Andrew wrote:Saint John wrote:What do you think of Dean's new signature?
Mmm....impressive obviously![]()
But not really appropriate. Deano - shall you castrate the wombat, or shall I?
I missed it, but with that comment, I can just imagine what it was.
Fear not my Florida sister, he grew it back overnight.
FishinMagician wrote:StoneCold wrote:stevek2007 wrote:piecesofeight wrote:Can't miss it now..I believe the whole sig is 'bigger'
Hope no one's kiddies are lookin' when you are..
I think it's funny....but as much as I like the dude's contributions to the place (unlike others, I've got nothin against the guy), I can't say it's appropriate for a site that's not filtered against kids surfin...
While I see your point, if a kid's got access to the net without active adult supervision, you can't stop them from stumbling across stuff anywhere. This has always been a NSFW site anyway (which equals NSFK).
The "adults only" warning on this thread would've been like an invitation for me when I was a kid.![]()
Strange, Odd, Rude, Sexy or Funny (Adults Only)
http://forums.melodicrock.com/phpBB/vie ... hp?t=20328
Let me contribute to the festivities.![]()
damn who is that???
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests