i wrote:Not nearly as good as Iron Man, but
loads of fun!
I really didn't
want to go because of the last one, lol. I wonder how many people are staying away because of that "Abomination"

I don't know ... there seems to be some revisionist history with that Ang Lee movie. A lot of critics are "remembering it" as a bomb and flop.
It definitely had a mixed reaction with some being really disappointed, though I think the critics remember it like Cutthroat Island and not as the $137 million dollar movie that made $245 million worldwide and sold another $200+ million on DVD.
It had its fans and there seems to be a "hip to hate" mentality today that wasn't there to the same degree when it was in theaters.
I thoughts Lee's version was "ok" but agreed with many of the criticisms levied against it. The thing that held up least for me was the Hulk himself. I went back and watched the Hulk scenes today after watching the one last night and it was like "wow - Shrek hit the gym"! I remember liking those scenes better in 2003 when I didn't have this Hulk to compare against.
It happens sometimes. I have a friend who proclaims that "he always hated" Star Wars: The Phantom Menace. When I ask him, "if you thought it sucked so badly, why'd you pay to see it in theaters 8 times?"
He usually forgets that he was singing its praises until it became "hip to hate" that movie on the internet. I think Hulk 2003 suffers from a bit of the same.