MysteryMountain wrote:I don't think watching Arnel for 14 years, and criticizing him is premature at all, I think it's more than fair.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Hold up. You said you preferred the JTT lineup. Therefore, I was talking about criticizing the new Journey official lineup - which, literally, just performed for the first time about a month ago and hasn't even done a full tour yet. If your real beef is with Arnel (diction, stage presence, whatever), then drop the pretense, and strictly say so.
Ummm, yes, I did say both of those things. I prefer JTT over current lineup. I also criticized Arnel in my opener, & the reply to you as well. No pretense here, it was pretty obvious.
MysteryMountain wrote:However, my main point here was simply that it's sad to think that this band is completely in tact, in terms of all original members, & both incarnations that mark the "height of Journey", are all still alive, and capable of performing (1978-80)(1981-97).
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I don't think is true at all. Outside of the Ringo shows, Rolie doesn't appear to want a rigorous touring schedule anymore. We all know Ross is lazy and gives zero fucks.
That's fair, but I was only making an observation. I don't know these guys personally. I said they all seem capable of performing. Maybe not night after night - which is why I proposed the idea of multiple lineups, per show, in my opener.
MysteryMountain wrote: Imho this current group falls short of what Journey should be, based on who's out there, probably crying in their own hands for one reason or another.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This is the most energized Journey lineup in years. No idea what you're talking about.
I worded this poorly. I was referring to the guys NOT in Journey probably crying in their hands due to their egos, or for one reason or another. That one was definitely on me. However, you keep referring to the infancy of this lineup which is nonsense. Neal, Arnel, Deen, Marco, Cain have all been there together. The only one who hasn't been is the Walden, who you clearly feel the need to protect based on other threads as well. To pretend they've played 4 shows & are above criticism is obviously nonsense when the bulk of this lineup have toured in the past, & together, &/or at least played together. My criticism goes beyond the last 4 shows. I was also no fan of Randy Jackson either. I was actually slightly happier to see Marco & Deen return. But my criticism is about the players who have been there who I've referenced: Arnel, Cain, & Walden just don't do it for me. Not sure why this offends you so much. "most energized" Umm, ok (?) My dog is full of energy too, doesn't mean I'm giving him the reigns to front Journey.
MysteryMountain wrote:I really have no issue with Marco playing for Ross, & I've noted that I prefer Deen (because I think he can pull off the songs better), & if we can't have Steve Smith, I"m good there. So, I don't think it's fair to say I'm judging anything prematurely.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:This lineup has performed a total of 4 full concerts so far together. You've already written them off, and don't think that's premature? Oookaay.
I never wrote them on! I've made that clear.
MysteryMountain wrote:...but, there are still a few of us out here who prefer Pre-Arnel Journey, and I think that's more than a fair opinion to have, especially knowing it's more than possible, except for the obvious.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:I don't know what "pre-Arnel Journey" refers to - Augeri stuff? Perry stuff? Rolie stuff?
I don't consider Augeri. I made it clear based on the years I used in my post, and cited the height of both Journey's Pre-Perry era, Perry/Rolllie, Perry/Cain.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:As for whether this new lineup will ever dive deeper into it's musical past (JTT style), it's pretty clear your mind was made up before they even stepped onto a stage.
I've heard all I need to hear from these 4 shows, & the multitude of shows they have done up to this point. Walden doesn't put them over the edge at all for me. It's the same ol' group, playing the same ol' songs.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Admit it - they could play "Next" or "Look Into The Future" front to back and you'd still find something to bitch about.
lol, that was actually funny. But since there is ZERO chance of that ever happening, I won't even consider the comment.
I think you take this way too serious. While my criticism may read/feel strong - its really not as strong as you seem to take it. I am a huge Journey fan, however, if I were to rank the incarnations in order, this current one would probably be last for me. Ok, yes, maybe they will BLOW me away with a new album, or play the entire Next album, lol, but I doubt it. Just feels like the same ol' same ol' to me. JTT was different. That was energy, they dug deep in the catalog, & that was great for this fan. I mean, seriously Good for Journey! Good for Neal! & Good for you & your love of this lineup. If 1978 Journey was a 10 for me, this is a 6. See what i'm saying here? If you love this lineup more than any previous, that's on you. Doesn't mean I hate Journey, doesn't mean I hate anyone, just not my bag historically & comparatively speaking.