MR

If this is true, Oprah will do no justice bringing attention to him. He deserves to rot where he is. Self defense my eye, he nearly severed her head. He killed them both in a jealous rage.

artist4perry wrote:If this is true, Oprah will do no justice bringing attention to him. He deserves to rot where he is. Self defense my eye, he nearly severed her head. He killed them both in a jealous rage.

Yeah, self defense in California with gloves and a ski mask.

RedWingFan wrote:

artist4perry wrote:If this is true, Oprah will do no justice bringing attention to him. He deserves to rot where he is. Self defense my eye, he nearly severed her head. He killed them both in a jealous rage.

Yeah, self defense in California with gloves and a ski mask.

He didn't want her to catch cold. He is so thoughtful!

ya know, i don't care what the lying sack of crack-whore shit says. he's still an asshole. also, wasn't there a dead man there too?

i don't believe the knife part either. self defense would have been fine in court, so bullshit and pretty pathetic after how many decades of thought?

also - as i understand it the couple had an akita who was there. this is why i fully believe OJ did it. akitas are VERY family protective. if you're not in their "pack" walk away. they're very unlikely to attack you unless you do something threatening. if you do something threatening to ANYONE in their pack, they will come at you with all they have.

if you're not familiar with akitas, they're bred in japan to hunt bear. not put one up a tree and wait for a gun to come along - take it out. kill it. ain't no more. the akita i have i gave to a friend on the farm proved how deadly they are by taking about a pack of dogs coming at his adopted mom. they were out running around and we could only piece the story together but he took out a few wild dogs, coyotes or the like and didn't get a scratch on him. so a very deadly dog but no other dog would i want by my side anymore either.

so if a "stranger" came at nicole, you'd need a cleanup crew to take care of that stranger and forget a body bag, won't be much of one left. if someone else in his pack did it, you just confused the shit out of the dog. i'm not 100% sure where the dog was but the akita was found w/blood on it, so he had to be close or there.

iceberg wrote:ya know, i don't care what the lying sack of crack-whore shit says. he's still an asshole. also, wasn't there a dead man there too?

i don't believe the knife part either. self defense would have been fine in court, so bullshit and pretty pathetic after how many decades of thought?

also - as i understand it the couple had an akita who was there. this is why i fully believe OJ did it. akitas are VERY family protective. if you're not in their "pack" walk away. they're very unlikely to attack you unless you do something threatening. if you do something threatening to ANYONE in their pack, they will come at you with all they have.

if you're not familiar with akitas, they're bred in japan to hunt bear. not put one up a tree and wait for a gun to come along - take it out. kill it. ain't no more. the akita i have i gave to a friend on the farm proved how deadly they are by taking about a pack of dogs coming at his adopted mom. they were out running around and we could only piece the story together but he took out a few wild dogs, coyotes or the like and didn't get a scratch on him. so a very deadly dog but no other dog would i want by my side anymore either.

so if a "stranger" came at nicole, you'd need a cleanup crew to take care of that stranger and forget a body bag, won't be much of one left. if someone else in his pack did it, you just confused the shit out of the dog. i'm not 100% sure where the dog was but the akita was found w/blood on it, so he had to be close or there.

Yes it was an akita beautiful dog.To bad it did not take OJ out.

Keep that gorilla in his fucking cage and pay him no mind. ANYONE that watches that is a piece of brainless asshole. What a joke. Regardless, Doprah has always been a coke whore who made the best of a chance she got, only because she was black, and she's finally gonna prove that. Good job.

looks like he admitted it already, according to the article... Ofer should pull... "psych!" on Orenthal and just say "I just wanted to get you to admit it".... and let his sorry ass ROT.

I call bullshit on that little story of his, I don't buy that self-defense crap.

RedWingFan wrote:

artist4perry wrote:If this is true, Oprah will do no justice bringing attention to him. He deserves to rot where he is. Self defense my eye, he nearly severed her head. He killed them both in a jealous rage.

Yeah, self defense in California with gloves and a ski mask.

Even if "it doesn't fit", OJ is full of shit.

Even *IF* she did have a kitchen knife in her hand, waving it around or not, it would have been because he had a long history of abusing her, with 911 tapes from times he showed up at her home in a rage to back that fact up.

But yeah... I'm sure it's totally common to run around Los Angeles wearing gloves in the middle of June. Nothing strange about that.

He (allegedly) admits taking the knife away from her... that is not self defense. Plus, he says he was mad at her, went home, got angrier and angrier before going over there to tell her off... then pounding on the door and yelling when no one answered... so her opening the door (for someone who has a history of this with her) with a knife in her had was self defense on her part.

If self defense was his intent, he'd have taken the knife from her and got rid of it somehow, threw it in the car, or whatever way to keep it away from her. Taking the knife from her and then using it to brutally murder TWO people is not self defense. I don't know how many of you have seen the crime scene photos... I have... and that was not a scene of someone defending themself from an attack. This lunatic is WAY the hell out of his tree if he actually believes that and even if he doesn't how the hell can he possibly think anyone else would.

This double jeopardy law is crap. Just like a person can be convicted and be released later based on further evidence that wasn't available at the time, it should work the other way around. If you're acquitted based on the evidence, or lack of, at the time, and then new information comes out later, you absolutely should be retried. The hell?