MR

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/03/20/294505/israel-driving-americas-welfare-cadillac/

To any American, the term “welfare Cadillac” refers to an undeserving “freeloader” living off the hard work of others. Today, America’s “welfare Cadillac” is Israel, a land of “milk and honey,” paid for by the taxes of America’s starving poor and defended by the blood of America’s “goyim” military, by toranic standards, bred to serve but not even considered “human.”

Yeah, this morning on my drive in to work I was listening to the news on the radio and they mentioned Obama's visit over there. They were interviewing someone and they were ranting about how Obama has to go after Syria with US Military might. A sound byte of the guy was played and he was ranting how Obama needs to do something now because only doing it after 5,000 plus people are gassed will be too late. I got to thinking this was exactly what Bush did with the WMD in Iraq. In that case no WMD were found so he got hammered for it. So what makes Obama different from Bush? It's now ok to go after Syria with only suspecting a gas attack is imminent and no real proof that this is going to happen, but wasn't ok to go after Iraq when Bush was in office? Bush went after the WMD issue for the safety of citizens on American soil. Obama's going to go after suspect imminent gas attack on citizens no on American soil?

What a garbage article. The writer was all over the place, contradicting himself every other paragraph.

The Sushi Hunter wrote:Yeah, this morning on my drive in to work I was listening to the news on the radio and they mentioned Obama's visit over there. They were interviewing someone and they were ranting about how Obama has to go after Syria with US Military might. A sound byte of the guy was played and he was ranting how Obama needs to do something now because only doing it after 5,000 plus people are gassed will be too late. I got to thinking this was exactly what Bush did with the WMD in Iraq. In that case no WMD were found so he got hammered for it. So what makes Obama different from Bush? It's now ok to go after Syria with only suspecting a gas attack is imminent and no real proof that this is going to happen, but wasn't ok to go after Iraq when Bush was in office? Bush went after the WMD issue for the safety of citizens on American soil. Obama's going to go after suspect imminent gas attack on citizens no on American soil?

I don't think that Obama is in any hurry to deal with Syria. They are already down playing the reports of chemical weapons being used. They state they have gotten reports but can't verify. Bullshit, with all of our "advanced" technology we can't determine this? In my opinion, the on;y action the U.S. should take on issues in the Middle East is to carpet bomb. No troops on the ground. But that surely is not going to happen.

The more I think about it, Israel is like a child who is now an adult and still living at home. At some point the parents need to force the child out on their own.