


http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Judge+ ... story.html
Moderator: Andrew
Enigma869 wrote:Seriously Canada...you must have more important things to do![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Judge+ ... story.html
"Since then Alan has been subjected to close supervision to prevent any further sexual activity on his part," said the judge.
Don wrote:I think if we knew the complete story, this would probably make sense. If the guy he is having sex with took advantage of him, this would be similar to a man having sex with a retarded girl who doesn't really have any concept of the act beyond the thought that "it feels good".
Dealing with the mentally handicapped has got to be a slippery slope in this regard.
If you go cruising the Special Olympics for a date and impregnate a mentally incapacitated girl, could it be construed as rape with inadequate consent?
Enigma869 wrote:Seriously Canada...you must have more important things to do![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Judge+ ... story.html
SherriBerry wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Seriously Canada...you must have more important things to do![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Judge+ ... story.html
Britain is not Canada! While this story was reprinted in The Vancouver Sun, it originated in The Daily Telegraph which is a newspaper from London, England. Right under the title of the story it says by Martin Beckford, The Daily Telegraph. In the ninth paragraph, the first line states "It is the latest controversial case to come before Britain's Court of Protection...", not British Columbia's, and up here it would be the B.C. Supreme Court. Sorry, wrong country!
SherriBerry wrote:Enigma869 wrote:Seriously Canada...you must have more important things to do![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.vancouversun.com/life/Judge+ ... story.html
Britain is not Canada! While this story was reprinted in The Vancouver Sun, it originated in The Daily Telegraph which is a newspaper from London, England. Right under the title of the story it says by Martin Beckford, The Daily Telegraph. In the ninth paragraph, the first line states "It is the latest controversial case to come before Britain's Court of Protection...", not British Columbia's, and up here it would be the B.C. Supreme Court. Sorry, wrong country!
SherriBerry wrote:
Britain is not Canada! While this story was reprinted in The Vancouver Sun, it originated in The Daily Telegraph which is a newspaper from London, England. Right under the title of the story it says by Martin Beckford, The Daily Telegraph. In the ninth paragraph, the first line states "It is the latest controversial case to come before Britain's Court of Protection...", not British Columbia's, and up here it would be the B.C. Supreme Court. Sorry, wrong country!
Don wrote:Canadians ARE British, they're just on extended holiday.
Arianddu wrote:Don wrote:Canadians ARE British, they're just on extended holiday.
You don know she's also the Queen of Canada, Australia and New Zealand as well, right?
SherriBerry wrote:Arianddu wrote:Don wrote:Canadians ARE British, they're just on extended holiday.
You don know she's also the Queen of Canada, Australia and New Zealand as well, right?
Canadians AREN'T British - we are Canadian! Canucks are a distinct and unique group, just like Aussies and Kiwis! We are members of the Commonwealth and Queen Elizabeth II is the head of our constitutional monarchy, but it is more symbolic than practical. I like that the historical ties remain, but our nation is no longer a British colony.
Enigma869 wrote:SherriBerry wrote:
Britain is not Canada! While this story was reprinted in The Vancouver Sun, it originated in The Daily Telegraph which is a newspaper from London, England. Right under the title of the story it says by Martin Beckford, The Daily Telegraph. In the ninth paragraph, the first line states "It is the latest controversial case to come before Britain's Court of Protection...", not British Columbia's, and up here it would be the B.C. Supreme Court. Sorry, wrong country!
My mistake. It was originally reported as happening in Candada when I watched the news, and is all over every Canadian website. Not to mention, the Canadian government just purchased a home in Wellesley, MA for the Canadian Consulate and the purchaser of the home listed in the paper was Queen Elizabeth II, so I didn't think it was a huge leap of faith that a county with a province named "British" Columbia may also have a court with the name "Britain's" Court of Protection!
StevePerryHair wrote:SherriBerry wrote:Arianddu wrote:Don wrote:Canadians ARE British, they're just on extended holiday.
You don know she's also the Queen of Canada, Australia and New Zealand as well, right?
Canadians AREN'T British - we are Canadian! Canucks are a distinct and unique group, just like Aussies and Kiwis! We are members of the Commonwealth and Queen Elizabeth II is the head of our constitutional monarchy, but it is more symbolic than practical. I like that the historical ties remain, but our nation is no longer a British colony.
I have a feeling that was his humor. It's kind of eeyore dry, but funny!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests