day 1 - no froy- what could he be up to???

Paradise Theater

Moderator: Andrew

Postby gr8dane » Sat Jun 19, 2010 4:46 am

Toph wrote:
brywool wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
brywool wrote:I think it would be fine actually.
I think that most would like to see the band back together. However, many realize that won't happen, so they've moved on and it's okay to like both camps. Gowan, Phillips, and Todd are decent (Todd is amazing). The guys playing in Dennis' band are decent too.

I tell ya, if both camps keep doing the same old thing, I'm getting to the point where I don't care anymore. Seriously, for Styx to have the talent they do and for them to be content rehashing old stuff... boggles the mind. I would bet that Dennis does nothing new either. Granted, he had the latest of the new stuff, but I bet after the dismal showing 100 Years made, that he's done with doing new stuff. Too bad on both accounts.

If they're going to get together, it's going to take a 3rd party to do it.


I believe that DDY made his last solo album because a person at the Canadian record label (that released OYFN) asked him to do it. If people keep doing that kind of thing I think we will see more. At this stage in the game I could see him doing one more album. Time will tell. Truthfully, I never expected to even see him put out another album in the first place.


I hope that someone whispers into both camp's ears- "People want new music from you".
I'm trying!

Yeah, it was nice to hear new Dennis music. There were a couple of crappy songs there, but there were also some great ones.


Can't ever really give the guy a full fledged compliment, can you Bry? You and monker are two of a kind.


Well well then,how about a full fledged compliment from you about JY or Tommy or Styx as it is.You and froy are two of a kind.
Jesus loves you ,but everybody else thinks you're a knob.
User avatar
gr8dane
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Zoltar 7

Postby froy » Sat Jun 19, 2010 5:03 am

gr8dane"


Well well then,how about a full fledged compliment from you about JY or Tommy or Styx as it is.You and froy are two of a kind.


What kind of compliment would you like me to give to the 2 guys who hijacked the classic STYX band.
Please tell me.. :(
froy
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7376
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:48 am

Postby Babyblue » Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:34 am

froy wrote:
"brywool"

I hope that someone whispers into both camp's ears- "People want new music from you".


I think it would be better to whisper into both camps ears that we only want 1 camp



No we don't either. :roll: :shock:
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby Classicrockr » Tue Jul 06, 2010 12:40 am

He's passionate about the situation because its a sad fact that there is no STYX without Dennis. For Roboto being such a thorn in TS & JY's side, why do they advertise the Roboto cover in the background during their shows?





The Froydian Army will prevail......
Classicrockr
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:50 am
Location: Richlands, NC

Postby Babyblue » Tue Jul 06, 2010 6:13 am

Classicrockr wrote:He's passionate about the situation because its a sad fact that there is no STYX without Dennis. For Roboto being such a thorn in TS & JY's side, why do they advertise the Roboto cover in the background during their shows?





The Froydian Army will prevail......



There is still a Styx without DDY & that is the way it is people.
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby Classicrockr » Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:23 am

Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!
Classicrockr
Ol' 78
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:50 am
Location: Richlands, NC

Postby Boomchild » Tue Jul 06, 2010 3:44 pm

Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


It is certainly called Styx but that is about as far as it goes. It's nowhere near the "Classic Line Up" and the diversity in music that they had. To me that is what made them great. With the current line up it's like only getting part of the picture. They have limited themselves by steering away from a lot of DDY's material. As far as OYFN, it does have parts to it that feel very much like "Classic Styx".
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby froy » Wed Jul 07, 2010 1:19 am

Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


I concur Captain..
froy
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7376
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:48 am

Postby gr8dane » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:15 am

froy wrote:
Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


I concur Captain..


Deck hands always concur with their captain.
Jesus loves you ,but everybody else thinks you're a knob.
User avatar
gr8dane
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 10:45 pm
Location: Zoltar 7

Postby DarrenUK » Wed Jul 07, 2010 5:49 am

Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


You say the setlist is dated but what songs would change if Dennis did return ?, Suite Madam Blue ?, Grand Illusion ?, Come Sail Away ?,

I would love one more tour with DDY but it wont happen ....
User avatar
DarrenUK
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 1:22 am
Location: Palm Bay, Florida

Postby froy » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:08 am

DarrenUK wrote:
Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


You say the setlist is dated but what songs would change if Dennis did return ?, Suite Madam Blue ?, Grand Illusion ?, Come Sail Away ?,

I would love one more tour with DDY but it wont happen ....


Rockin The Paradise
Show Me The Way
Im Ok
Queen of Spades
Best of Times
Babe
Lady the correct way
Sail The correct way
froy
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7376
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 1:48 am

Postby chickenbeef » Wed Jul 07, 2010 7:44 am

gr8dane wrote:
froy wrote:
Classicrockr wrote:Peter Criss said it best "There may be 4 guys in makeup on stage, but without Me & Ace, it ain't KISS".

Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Just listen to 100 years - it even sounds like Styx more than the current group who's trying to call themselves Styx. 100 years rocked so much better than Cyclorama did - there's just no comparison!


I concur Captain..


Deck hands always concur with their captain.


100 years from now was produced well but the songs were forgettable. KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace
chickenbeef
LP
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:59 am

Postby Boomchild » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:16 pm

chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby chickenbeef » Wed Jul 07, 2010 3:31 pm

Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun
chickenbeef
LP
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:59 am

Postby Boomchild » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:03 pm

chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby LtVanish » Wed Jul 07, 2010 4:05 pm

Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.


I agree, I really don't get why anyone, even 12 year olds would listen to Kiss. Their music sucks the big one.
User avatar
LtVanish
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:05 pm
Location: Chicago IL

Postby Babyblue » Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:24 pm

Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.



I have to agree here :wink: I just never got into that band at all.But i do like Genes show he is a hoot. :lol: :lol:
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby LtVanish » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:25 am

Babyblue wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.



I have to agree here :wink: I just never got into that band at all.But i do like Genes show he is a hoot. :lol: :lol:


You don't find Gene Yummy? :?
User avatar
LtVanish
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1244
Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 1:05 pm
Location: Chicago IL

Postby pinkfloyd1973 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:38 am

LtVanish wrote: You don't find Gene Yummy? :?



:lol:
"So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause."
User avatar
pinkfloyd1973
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Sweet Home Chicago

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:54 am

LtVanish wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.


I agree, I really don't get why anyone, even 12 year olds would listen to Kiss. Their music sucks the big one.

The music is certainly not forgettable, I actually hear it played more than Styx ...whom I also love!!
Play a Styx song for 100 people and a Kiss song for the same 100 people and see which one is recognized by the majority!!
You people are either insane or really, really old!! LV ...you look pretty good for a man of 85!!:wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Boomchild » Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:06 pm

Michigan Girl wrote:
LtVanish wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.


I agree, I really don't get why anyone, even 12 year olds would listen to Kiss. Their music sucks the big one.

The music is certainly not forgettable, I actually hear it played more than Styx ...whom I also love!!
Play a Styx song for 100 people and a Kiss song for the same 100 people and see which one is recognized by the majority!!
You people are either insane or really, really old!! LV ...you look pretty good for a man of 85!!:wink:


Just because one band or artist gets airplay more then the other does not mean it's not forgettable material. Look at the current music that is played on the air today, most of it is forgettable. In terms of forgettable, maybe I should have said lacking real substance. Most bands have some material that lacks substance but for the most part that is pretty much Kiss' entire catalog. I would not doubt that more people would be able to pick out a Kiss song over a Styx song. That's mainly due to the fact that Kiss had much better promotion back in their day then Styx did. Still doesn't mean it's good material or that those that would be able to pick it out thinks it's good. Take Babe for example. I'm sure by and large those same 100 people would know that one but may feel they don't care for it. As far as your comment about being "old", actually I think you would find that older people would like Kiss then younger people. The fact is that these older people you refer to were in their youth at the height of Kiss' popularity.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:44 am

I was around in Kiss' heyday so you can stop stooping!!

Yes, you should have said lacking in substance, that's entirely
different and I still don't entirely agree!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Boomchild » Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:44 pm

Michigan Girl wrote:I was around in Kiss' heyday so you can stop stooping!!

Yes, you should have said lacking in substance, that's entirely
different and I still don't entirely agree!! :wink:


That's cool. Nothing wrong with having a different opinion.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Babyblue » Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:24 pm

LtVanish wrote:
Babyblue wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:
Boomchild wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:KISS is a way better band without drug addict peter and drunk ace


Right, If you are still twelve years old or like songs with very simple structure and forgettable lyrics.


what's wrong with simple structure?

no place for hiding baby no place to run you pull the trigger on my love gun


I guess what I am trying to say is that the reasons that Kiss had the success they had was because of their stage gimmicks and Gene Simmons' relentless merchandising and franchising of the Kiss name. There music is just plain forgettable.



I have to agree here :wink: I just never got into that band at all.But i do like Genes show he is a hoot. :lol: :lol:


You don't find Gene Yummy? :?


That was just to darn funny. :roll: :shock:
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby Monker » Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:40 pm

Classicrockr wrote:Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Funny, Dennis' set is ALL older Styx songs and is even MORE dated.

At least Styx performs "One With Everything" and Walrus.

Just listen to 100 years


Just don't expect to listen to it in concert. He would rather perform Tommy's Styx songs then his own solo work.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby Monker » Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:42 pm

Boomchild wrote:It is certainly called Styx but that is about as far as it goes. It's nowhere near the "Classic Line Up" and the diversity in music that they had. To me that is what made them great. With the current line up it's like only getting part of the picture. They have limited themselves by steering away from a lot of DDY's material. As far as OYFN, it does have parts to it that feel very much like "Classic Styx".


And, if they relied more on DDY's songs, his fans would complain that Gowan is singing Dennis' songs. So, I don't see any reason to try to please his fans. You'll whine no matter what they do.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby pinkfloyd1973 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:28 am

Monker wrote:
Boomchild wrote:It is certainly called Styx but that is about as far as it goes. It's nowhere near the "Classic Line Up" and the diversity in music that they had. To me that is what made them great. With the current line up it's like only getting part of the picture. They have limited themselves by steering away from a lot of DDY's material. As far as OYFN, it does have parts to it that feel very much like "Classic Styx".


And, if they relied more on DDY's songs, his fans would complain that Gowan is singing Dennis' songs. So, I don't see any reason to try to please his fans. You'll whine no matter what they do.



Monkey, your record's skipping :roll:
"So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause."
User avatar
pinkfloyd1973
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Sweet Home Chicago

Postby StyxCollector » Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:58 am

Monker wrote:
Classicrockr wrote:Same thing with STYX - there may be 2 guys on stage (JY & TS) but without Dennis, the show is so stale & the setlist so dated, that it ain't STYX.


Funny, Dennis' set is ALL older Styx songs and is even MORE dated.

At least Styx performs "One With Everything" and Walrus.

Just listen to 100 years


Just don't expect to listen to it in concert. He would rather perform Tommy's Styx songs then his own solo work.


Actually, you're wrong.

1. I saw the song 100 Years live this year (back in February in RI). He does his new stuff very occasionally (although mainly in Quebec), and Desert Moon is pretty much in every set (it was also a minor hit on radio and MTV). Read that new interview with DDY that Suite linked. It explains it all and what he said could also be applied to Styx. He also said it in my interview. It's not the die hards who make up the large percentage of a Styx or DDY audience - it's people who want to relive memories.
2. Styx hasn't done OWE in a long time. And Walrus they don't do anymore ... and it's a cover from the '60s. Nice try. Even songs like "Just Be" are gone, and as far as I know, they haven't done the new song from Regeneration yet.
User avatar
StyxCollector
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:14 am

Postby Monker » Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:00 am

pinkfloyd1973 wrote:
Monker wrote:
Boomchild wrote:It is certainly called Styx but that is about as far as it goes. It's nowhere near the "Classic Line Up" and the diversity in music that they had. To me that is what made them great. With the current line up it's like only getting part of the picture. They have limited themselves by steering away from a lot of DDY's material. As far as OYFN, it does have parts to it that feel very much like "Classic Styx".


And, if they relied more on DDY's songs, his fans would complain that Gowan is singing Dennis' songs. So, I don't see any reason to try to please his fans. You'll whine no matter what they do.



Monkey, your record's skipping :roll:


Along with everybody elses.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Postby pinkfloyd1973 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:41 am

Monker wrote:
pinkfloyd1973 wrote:
Monker wrote:
Boomchild wrote:It is certainly called Styx but that is about as far as it goes. It's nowhere near the "Classic Line Up" and the diversity in music that they had. To me that is what made them great. With the current line up it's like only getting part of the picture. They have limited themselves by steering away from a lot of DDY's material. As far as OYFN, it does have parts to it that feel very much like "Classic Styx".


And, if they relied more on DDY's songs, his fans would complain that Gowan is singing Dennis' songs. So, I don't see any reason to try to please his fans. You'll whine no matter what they do.



Monkey, your record's skipping :roll:


Along with everybody elses.



At least you're consistently wrong :lol:
"So this is how liberty dies, with thunderous applause."
User avatar
pinkfloyd1973
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1725
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:15 am
Location: Sweet Home Chicago

PreviousNext

Return to Styx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests