Moderator: Andrew
styxman wrote:I guess what I'm trying to say is, we can get the DDY material from his concerts and the Styx material not penned from DDY from their concerts but more of the new material because 70's and 80's material albeit good doesn't fit in with the new concert goer and that's what they need to attract, okay they can be like the Temptations/Four tops and tour every year doing the same old stuff but how long can that last, we're all getting older and they need new blood to make an impact......and guessing from the new Styx lineup thy don't want to be a memory activation band
Yep, Suite, you're right
but we can have our memories from CD and Styx or the new named band can drop a few in, but at the end of the day concert paying folk need new material and inovation, you and many alike in the US have probably had a good guess at the set list to each and every Styx concert, it's like a repeat on the TV.......how many times can you justify paying to hear the same old back catalogue with just a few new songs?
Now here's the punch line............I think Styx should ditch the band name..........
It's 1am over here, so I'm signing off for a good nights sleep, it's been great talking sensibly to you melodic heavy weights....
Suite please don't think I'm against DDY or trying to make any waves, it's just the longevity of the band that's in my thoughts, I'd like nothin' more for them to become the next U2.......
because unlike most of the crap pushed out by record companies, these guys know how to play an instrument and incredibly well at that, even when it's spinning around.....Goodnight Sadie and Suite and Classic
styxman wrote:Bugsy,
I know but wouldn't it be great to go to a new concert wondering who the hell are SZ2 and leaving afterwards saying that's a great new band...they kicked arse tonight, especially for their age....off to bed mate!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests