Here's the link.

http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/ ... 50310/1002
Moderator: Andrew
SierraMyst wrote:Suite Madame Blue,
Let me just say I love your AVI...Love it.
Thanks for the welcome. I was scared to post for no reason I guess. I happened to stumble on an argument with a new poster the first time I looked at old posts here, so I guess I had that misnomer set in my mind.
Why would I talk about Arbys? YUCK! LOL...
Thanks for the welcome...
"We need to be more of a rock band," he said. "We recognize that now to get airplay on a new track is more difficult, as we're typecast as dinosaurs.
"We made some amazing records together, but based on Dennis' behavior from 1982 onwards, we have no desire to work with him ever again," Young said. "Dennis seemed unwilling to be a team member."
This is what will help to fan the fires forever. I'm sorry, but it dates back to 1979, not 1982, and they happily took him back for 20 years.
JY certainly was not complaining when the money was rolling in from multiple platinum albums like Cornerstone and PT which had ballads as hits
or Kilroy led by "Roboto" which didn't rock as hard as, say, "Miss America".
Had this been 1979 again and they were at the height of their popularity, I bet the same thing that happened in 1979 would have happened in 1999.
I don't mind if you know my take on the band right from the get go...and I'm not really worried about proving my Styx history knowledge to anyone. I'm not someone who is anything more than a fan. I don't have enough time to study the history of the band. I'm sure there are lots of people here I can talk to that can fill in the gaps and such. I don't want to get into choosing sides. I like all of them, but I want Dennis with them. That's all. If it's not gonna happen, that's fine. I will support them all whatever they decide.
I'm certain there's a lot that went on behind the scenes over the years that led to the straw that broke the camels back. We are just fans so we can't know the whole deal.
styxfanNH wrote:Although Yes I Can was never played live, many of the full length songs from Cyclorama played prior to the show in the pre-show music. The same is true for a few songs from BBT.
I am guessing it was/is supposed to make the audience go, hmmm I wonder who that is.
Someone close to the band needs to get to JY and tell him how he is coming across. But I am betting it's tactical.
I am also guessing that they feel some additional need to prove thwmselves now that Glen is with DDY. This is why we are seeing shots again from Tommy as well as JY.
Liz22562 wrote:The last time I saw Styx in concert, it most definitely wasn't about JY. They put on an amazing performance and I was happy to see the teenagers in the crowd singing along. Great music, great concert.
Zan wrote:Liz22562 wrote:The last time I saw Styx in concert, it most definitely wasn't about JY. They put on an amazing performance and I was happy to see the teenagers in the crowd singing along. Great music, great concert.
I don't think that's the issue most people have, Liz. MOST of us here know they put on a good show (sans one or three), but they're upset how JY always likes to mention Dennis amd how much harder and edgier they are without him, etc.
To give props to the recent DDY article, he was quoted saying something to the effect of "You have two guys there and two guys here. Enjoy it..." paraphrasing here, but you get the point (Although, Glen, who is now miraculously reached status of "Styx member" was only one of "JY, Tommy, and a couple other guys" when DDY was doing his interview circuits in '99 and 2000, but I guess that's all changed since Glen is now playing with Dennis). *g* My attitude has always been, the more the merrier. You don't have to agree with how things are handled to be able to appreciate that we now have 2 "forms" of Styx touring around. If you don't like the interviews, stop reading them - support the music you enjoy because you love the music.
Ash wrote:I wouldn't read the interviews if they weren't posted here. And to be honest, whether or not I like them or not isn't the issue. The issue to me is more the revisionist history and how it tends to be adapted given what is currently going on around him (speaking in terms of JY). You can have two sides of an argument - two people who see the same set of circulstances in completely different lights and still have an intellectually honest debate. When you degrade that into denegrating the other person's work and say how it makes you sick when for years you went along with it - then intellectual honesty goes out the window.
To me - it's been more about intellectual honesty and the highly personal tone that JY takes when approaching the subject.
Besides - I've met Dennis enough times now to consider him a friend... and when someone attacks a friend - they've attacked me. And with Suite knowing Dennis and Suzanne a lot more closely than I do I can only imagine how some of the mischaricturizations(froy spelling) make her feel as well.
I have a group of programmers I worked with 5 years ago and after 2 years of work we hated eachother. We flamed and fought on forums for about a year. Now while some of them are content to pick the burning ashes and embers for more conflict, the only thing I say to people is "They had their way of doing things - and I have mine... and here's what I'm doing now please don't ask me about them."
Monker wrote:Happily? History doesn't support that description. Reluctantly is a better word here.
Wait a sec...you just brought up about Dennis being FIRED. That's not complaining enough for you? That seems like a huge contradiction to me.
Oh, no, they didn't complain. They just broke up for a number of years.
Of course...but, 1999 is in a different place then in 1979. They had a choice...They could either continue Styx with Dennis controling and limiting how much and how often they toured...Or, they could let him go and do what THEY (everybody else in the band) wanted. It's actually the same question Journey had to answer after TBF was released. They had nothing to lose by letting Dennis go, at that point.
In 1979, they had a lot to lose...The stakes were a lot greater...the risk was a lot higher...so they played it safe.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests