Moderator: Andrew
"We don't want to be the band that plays the same 30 songs over and over," Young said. "With all the writing prowess in the band, we are making strides each day. We don't want to limit ourselves. We're once again a progressive rock band, not a gimmicky pop band. We want to make music that is powerful and sincere."
styxfanNH wrote:http://www.mlive.com/entertainment/grpress/index.ssf?/base/entertainment-2/1152283677230460.xml&coll=6
Styx welcomes third generation of fans
Friday, July 07, 2006
whocares wrote:hmmmm, I seem to remember Progressive Rock once being used to label bands like Kansas and Journey in the early days, along with the Dixie Dregs and much later and thankfully, Dream Theater. Styx Progessive Rock? That almost made me choke on my lunch.
Zan wrote:Kansas and Journey were progressive rock??? Well, if it's good enough for them, I guess it's good enough for Styx, but I always pictured bands like REM and the Police to be more progressive rock. I guess a label is whatever you decide it means.
DerriD wrote:Zan wrote:Kansas and Journey were progressive rock??? Well, if it's good enough for them, I guess it's good enough for Styx, but I always pictured bands like REM and the Police to be more progressive rock. I guess a label is whatever you decide it means.
I always thought that progressive rock started and ended with Yes. Asia had been considered prog rock as well. I do remember reading a long time ago that 'Styx was started as an American answer to Yes.' Personally I never thought of them as that, but Prog rock tends to be defined as keyboard driven rock. Listen to an album like Pieces of Eight and you could maybe see where people thought that.
whocares wrote:The Stray Cats was one I only ever heard as Rockabilly too. Later on his own they Setzer called the newer band Swing.
whocares wrote:The "problem" for Setzer, he said he made more money doing the swing fad that came back for a short time, than he did with the Cats. That's really sad.
Rock -n- Roll is hear to stay, no matter what kind of rock. The other's just come and go every decade or so.
whocares wrote:hmmmm, I seem to remember Progressive Rock once being used to label bands like Kansas and Journey in the early days
Zan wrote:I guess. lol
But if we're putting Yes, Kansas, and Journey in this pile, Styx should definitely be in there as well. I guess I associate "progressive rock" with the late-late 70s thru the 80s sound (Flock of Seagulls, Kim Wild, Blondie, REM, and so on) more than the psychedelic or synthy sounds of the mid to late 70s like yes and Kansas. *shrug*
But then, I always thought of Brian Setzer's group as "swing" and I was told in no uncertain terms that they were indeed "rockabilly," and NOT swing. Whatever. If it's good, it's good, and if it sucks, it sucks. lol[/color][/b]
Zan wrote:whocares wrote:The "problem" for Setzer, he said he made more money doing the swing fad that came back for a short time, than he did with the Cats. That's really sad.
Rock -n- Roll is hear to stay, no matter what kind of rock. The other's just come and go every decade or so.
Brian Setzer rocks my face, no matter if he's in playing rockabilly or swing. He does a great job with all of it.
LordofDaRing wrote:"All the writing prowess in this band"????? Lets see you do have Tommy and uhhhh
oh yeah a cover album, but I think Hendrix and the Beatles and people like that get writing credit. But you know JY could claim that he and TS wrote I am the Walrus. That coo cco c'joob line was stolen from that TS song he use to sing in the bowling alley, ain't gonna get down no more.
Aside from that you have one album they have done together, with mixed reivews and a ton of live stuff with the "same old 30 songs being played over and over" on them. That is hardly "creating new music regularly", one new CD in seven years together? Of course they could be going for Boston's time table on new recordings, about one a decade. "Once again a progressive rock band", yep still playing a lot of songs written and sung by the "gimmicky POP band" former lead singer/keyboardist...that Gowan can "run circles around". He must mean literally running in circles around that keyboard that he does live, other than that...nah!
Dear Charlie Brusco (sp?) current manger of Styx and former manager of Tommy shaw solo artist:
Please make JY shut up.
Sincerely:
LOTR
Derri sez: I do remember reading a long time ago that 'Styx was started as an American answer to Yes.'
pinkfloyd1973 wrote:Derri sez: I do remember reading a long time ago that 'Styx was started as an American answer to Yes.'
Yes, I do remember hearing Styx was "America's answer to English Progressive Rock"![]()
Robin![]()
yogi wrote:I always heard that Styx was Americas answer to Queen. I always thought that Styx was twice the band that Queen ever dreamed of being. I still do.
Death at a young age seems to change alot of perceptions. It turns many people into instant legends. In my opinion this is what happened with Freddy( rest in peace) and to Queen.
I also believe Styx, Journey, Kansas, etc were considered progressive bands up until their HUGE success. After they started selling millions of albums and selling out huge arenas they lost their 'progressive' lable and started being called 'areana' rock. Progressive was deemed 'more cool' by the critics. The Areana bands were considered faceless,sellouts, that lacked any real talent and substance.
What a crock!!!!
styxfanNH wrote:I tend to remember hearing a long time ago somewhere that Freddie did all the vocals on the albums. Does anyone else remember hearing that?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests