Moderator: Andrew
blt man wrote:Would it be accurate to claim that 80% of the audience at a Styx headlined concert could be considered "new generation" Styx fans while 20% of the audience "old loyalists"?
So says Gowan in this new article:
http://www.simcoe.com/article/38045
Seems kind of high to me.
blt man wrote:Would it be accurate to claim that 80% of the audience at a Styx headlined concert could be considered "new generation" Styx fans while 20% of the audience "old loyalists"?
So says Gowan in this new article:
http://www.simcoe.com/article/38045
Seems kind of high to me.
Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.

Zan wrote:Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.
That and 25 years happpened.
NealIsGod wrote:Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.

Zan wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.
Gosh, I'd love to help, but I kind of have my hands full here, thanks.
NealIsGod wrote:Zan wrote:Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.
That and 25 years happpened.
Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.
[/quote]
Are the DeYoung "freaks" and the Perry "freaks" consistent in their arguements. For example if one thinks Styx should not tour without DDY, I would think they would think Journey should not tour without SP and vice versa. That is the camp I am in - and I am just wondering if most people are consistent in their viewpoints.
blt man wrote:Would it be accurate to claim that 80% of the audience at a Styx headlined concert could be considered "new generation" Styx fans while 20% of the audience "old loyalists"?
So says Gowan in this new article:
http://www.simcoe.com/article/38045
Seems kind of high to me.
rajah2165 wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Zan wrote:Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.
That and 25 years happpened.
Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.
Are the DeYoung "freaks" and the Perry "freaks" consistent in their arguements. For example if one thinks Styx should not tour without DDY, I would think they would think Journey should not tour without SP and vice versa. That is the camp I am in - and I am just wondering if most people are consistent in their viewpoints.
Rockwriter wrote:blt man wrote:Would it be accurate to claim that 80% of the audience at a Styx headlined concert could be considered "new generation" Styx fans while 20% of the audience "old loyalists"?
So says Gowan in this new article:
http://www.simcoe.com/article/38045
Seems kind of high to me.
I don't believe that for a second, frankly. I wonder what kind of research there might be to back that up? The concert I attended was predominately older people with perhaps 15-20 percent of a younger generation sprinkled in. Same with Dennis, about the same demographic mix.
Now, it may well be that of the older people there, a high percentage of them are older people who were turned on to the music in the old days but are just now seeing the band for the first time. And it may also well be that only twenty percent of those in attendance are the hardcore Dennis era Styx fans, because so many of them simply won't go anymore.
But that fails to account that even for the newbies that are older, and even for the younger ones, the fact is that almost all of them that are seeing the band for the first time were turned on to the band by the continuing exposure the old music receives, not by new albums like CYCLO or BBT. So if this article means to imply that, that's absurd - the article isn't really clear on that point - but if all he's saying is that a high percentage of people at Styx shows are going for the first time, well, that's true of basically every classic rock band. But the people that are there are still there because of the past for the most part. There are not anywhere near enough people that are even aware of the new albums to make up 80 % of the Styx audiences every night. I think sometimes the band members find it an easier pill to swallow if they can find a way to believe otherwise. I'm not disparaging Styx, because it's a very good live band in any incarnation, but I DO think there's a little bit of looking on the brightest possible side of the numbers and making them say things that they really don't.
I hope all is well.
Sterling
blt man wrote:rajah2165 wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Zan wrote:Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.
That and 25 years happpened.
Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.
Are the DeYoung "freaks" and the Perry "freaks" consistent in their arguements. For example if one thinks Styx should not tour without DDY, I would think they would think Journey should not tour without SP and vice versa. That is the camp I am in - and I am just wondering if most people are consistent in their viewpoints.
Neither the current Styx nor Journey come close to the group dubbed the Kale's Clones. For those who don't know, the original bassist of the Guess Who (Jim Kale) owns the Guess Who name and tours occassionally under the Guess Who name with the original drummer and a some other hacks who play guitar and sing lead vocals. Over the last few years, Burton Cummings and Randy Bachman the lead singer and guitarist of the Guess Who have not been able to use the name and when the 2 of them play together they tour as Bachman/Cummings. This would be the equivalent of DDY and TS touring as DeYoung/Shaw with the Panozzo Brothers hiring a guitarist and a keyboardist and touring as Styx.
Rockwriter wrote:blt man wrote:rajah2165 wrote:NealIsGod wrote:Zan wrote:Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened.
That and 25 years happpened.
Nice, Zan. I need you in the Journey forum to smack some sense into the Perry freaks.
Are the DeYoung "freaks" and the Perry "freaks" consistent in their arguements. For example if one thinks Styx should not tour without DDY, I would think they would think Journey should not tour without SP and vice versa. That is the camp I am in - and I am just wondering if most people are consistent in their viewpoints.
Neither the current Styx nor Journey come close to the group dubbed the Kale's Clones. For those who don't know, the original bassist of the Guess Who (Jim Kale) owns the Guess Who name and tours occassionally under the Guess Who name with the original drummer and a some other hacks who play guitar and sing lead vocals. Over the last few years, Burton Cummings and Randy Bachman the lead singer and guitarist of the Guess Who have not been able to use the name and when the 2 of them play together they tour as Bachman/Cummings. This would be the equivalent of DDY and TS touring as DeYoung/Shaw with the Panozzo Brothers hiring a guitarist and a keyboardist and touring as Styx.
That's pretty funny. A long time ago, maybe fifteen years or more, I played on the bill with "The Byrds". I have no recollection of who was in the group at the time, but I do remember that none of them were original members, and none of them was anybody I had ever heard of. It was no different than simply seeing a Byrds cover band, and not a particularly good one at that. Very funny and sad at the same time.
Sterling

Over the last few years, Burton Cummings and Randy Bachman the lead singer and guitarist of the Guess Who have not been able to use the name and when the 2 of them play together they tour as Bachman/Cummings.

stmonkeys wrote:i think that's also why the doobie brothers broke up. they got to a point where none of the member of the band were original, or "classic" members. then again, that band always was a revolving door...

Blue Falcon wrote:Wow, just 300 loyalists attend each show these days? What happened to the days of yore when they would play to 15,000 a night in the 70s and 80s???
Oh yeah, that's right: JY happened. Wish these guys would pull their heads from their collective arses and get together just to play their music...they don't have to LIKE each other.
Zan wrote:stmonkeys wrote:i think that's also why the doobie brothers broke up. they got to a point where none of the member of the band were original, or "classic" members. then again, that band always was a revolving door...
The new Main Street Singers?

bugsymalone wrote:Over the last few years, Burton Cummings and Randy Bachman the lead singer and guitarist of the Guess Who have not been able to use the name and when the 2 of them play together they tour as Bachman/Cummings.
That is interesting. I always enjoyed the Guess Who, especially Burton Cummings. How do those two guys sound? Especially Cummings. Anyone seen one of their concerts?
Bugsy
Rockwriter wrote:
That's pretty funny. A long time ago, maybe fifteen years or more, I played on the bill with "The Byrds". I have no recollection of who was in the group at the time, but I do remember that none of them were original members, and none of them was anybody I had ever heard of. It was no different than simply seeing a Byrds cover band, and not a particularly good one at that. Very funny and sad at the same time.
Sterling
bugsymalone wrote:Over the last few years, Burton Cummings and Randy Bachman the lead singer and guitarist of the Guess Who have not been able to use the name and when the 2 of them play together they tour as Bachman/Cummings.
That is interesting. I always enjoyed the Guess Who, especially Burton Cummings. How do those two guys sound? Especially Cummings. Anyone seen one of their concerts?
Bugsy

DDYStyxFan wrote:With the band's personal relationships aside I think we can all agree that its not Styx without Dennis.

stabbim wrote:DDYStyxFan wrote:With the band's personal relationships aside I think we can all agree that its not Styx without Dennis.
Oh my stars, yes. Without a doubt we can all agree on that. Absolutely. In fact, this forum is chock-full with nothing but that kind of agreement, post after post, stretching as far as the eye can see. It's like a beautiful dream, really.
Welcome to the Internet.


bugsymalone wrote:Welcome, DDYStyxFan. A bit of advice. Read some of the threads and posts here, maybe, first, before, you know, posting.
Bugsy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest