Moderator: Andrew
Skates wrote:I don't think he's afraid of Dennis, I think he's just trying to avoid the stress involved with Dennis.
Zan wrote:Skates wrote:I don't think he's afraid of Dennis, I think he's just trying to avoid the stress involved with Dennis.
LOL! I think he was making a joke.
Unless he meant to protect him from Tammy Faye.
As for this part:
" I would like to think a mature adult would have at least heard him out...
I think he already went that route and got nothing but grief. You know what they say: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice....well, you can't fool me twice!
ManOfMiracles wrote:Zan wrote:Skates wrote:I don't think he's afraid of Dennis, I think he's just trying to avoid the stress involved with Dennis.
LOL! I think he was making a joke.
Unless he meant to protect him from Tammy Faye.
As for this part:
" I would like to think a mature adult would have at least heard him out...
I think he already went that route and got nothing but grief. You know what they say: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice....well, you can't fool me twice!
Part joke, part serious. LOL I won't pretend to know the stress behind all of this. But I know I'm a glutton for punishment myself, and will keep sticking my hand in the fire... especially when it comes to long-time acquaintances. Dunno... I can only speak from my pijnt of biew, obviouisly. But if someone I've known for 40 years tried contacting me... I may regret it later but I'd probably try to find out what its about.
*Hypethetically...* (and in no way an I suggesting that this is the case) lets say person #1 has fallen ill or something or some truly terribly, persoanly newa has occurred. Person 2 is angry and ignores him. Then something bad happens, and person 2 spend X number of years kicking himself in the ass for not picking up the phone. Seen it happen a dozen times, and did it myself. Granted, it's likely nothing liek that... but only takes that happening once to feel bad for a long, long time... Even if it was just a peace-attempt... life's short, ya know?
Zan wrote:
If person 1 wants to make a peace attempt with person 2, I would hope they'd be big enough not to involve person 3 (like in Denny's case...manager) to act as a mediator of the "peace talk."
ManOfMiracles wrote:Ya'll make some very good points. (Although my head started to spin reading all that for a second there... oy, you're as bad as I am... only you make less typos. I just re-read my own post. Note to self: no typing before the morning coffee!) I'm sure he has his reasons. Just because I think it's too bad, doesn't mean he's not justified.
Chuck wrote:I had a little time making JY [James Young] understand that it wasn't about him. He said, 'Charles, this is the first definitive book about Styx.' I said, 'JY, this is the first definitive book about Chuck.
Zan wrote:
Heh...I know the feeling (about the coffee, that is). No sweat. I know some of us fans consider this band to be somewhat of a personal thing too. It's only natural (notice I didn't say "normal") that reading about any strife or bad feelings amongst the members would strike a chord with some. But alas, just like us, these guys are human beings that make mistakes, have blemishes, and have sabotaged relationships & burned bridges. Too bad they can't always be as magnificant as most of their music has been. Such is life. Bummer and stuff, eh?
![]()
styxfanNH wrote:Trust is a hard thing to regain, once it is lost. I think that is what this quote shows.
StyxCollector wrote:We'll never know what might have been had Chuck accepted. I've genuinely gotten the impression (And I hope I get to verify it in an interview) that DDY wants to bury the hatchet. I am not saying return to Styx, but I get the sense he thinks everyone needs to move on.
StyxCollector wrote:I did like this quote:Chuck wrote:I had a little time making JY [James Young] understand that it wasn't about him. He said, 'Charles, this is the first definitive book about Styx.' I said, 'JY, this is the first definitive book about Chuck.
And you say DDY is egocentric? ha!
Chuck wrote:For me to take people to task -- which I could have -- what would it have served? Nothing.
yogi wrote:As for me the most close minded people I have ever come across are those who are on a mission. Those who have found THEIR cause. Nothing else seems to matter anymore to most of them.
yogi wrote:What I find soo damn funny is that all through Chucks book( yea I read it, in the closet) he talks about not letting people in. How he tried to tackle everything by himself so not to burden others. Scared as hell how they would react to his situation. He states over and over how he regrets doing this. How he should of let those clse to him in.
How will he ever know what Dennis wanted. It could be that Dennis has read Chucks book, admires the shit out of his courage,apologize, or maybe he just wants to shake the hand of a once old friend.
It makes me really wonder who the close minded one is now??
As for me the most close minded people I have ever come across are those who are on a mission. Those who have found THEIR cause. Nothing else seems to matter anymore to most of them.
Stabbim says: Sometimes the jokes write themselves.
stabbim wrote:StyxCollector wrote:We'll never know what might have been had Chuck accepted. I've genuinely gotten the impression (And I hope I get to verify it in an interview) that DDY wants to bury the hatchet. I am not saying return to Styx, but I get the sense he thinks everyone needs to move on.
Seems to me that CP has done that, and done it quite well. Don't know how having to sit through the guy stating his case one more time would go any further to accomplishing it.StyxCollector wrote:I did like this quote:Chuck wrote:I had a little time making JY [James Young] understand that it wasn't about him. He said, 'Charles, this is the first definitive book about Styx.' I said, 'JY, this is the first definitive book about Chuck.
And you say DDY is egocentric? ha!
It ain't a binary proposition, you know. You think when he said this...Chuck wrote:For me to take people to task -- which I could have -- what would it have served? Nothing.
...that he was only talking about DDY?
Rockwriter wrote: LOL, exactly. In fact my one problem with Chuck's book is that he kinda gave some guys a pass; basically, the guys he currently works with. It's written in an interesting way, in that when Dennis, whom Chuck no longer has to deal with, did something he did not like, he is named, but when someone else did it, they are referred to only as "a band member". I can understand why it has to be that way, but it's also a bit on the comical side for me because I know some of the other stories as well. There is one funny thing where Chuck says that his reaction to watching Behind The Music for the first time was, "These idiots!" LOL, he was talking about all of them. I know that privately Chuck has said that all three of the front men of Styx have big egos and their ego battles destroyed the band, but he could not really say that in his book, for obvious reasons.
Chuck wrote:It's difficult to single out any one person to place all the blame on. It takes two (or more) to have an argument. However, most of the conflicts involved a common figure.
stabbim wrote:Seems to me that CP has done that, and done it quite well. Don't know how having to sit through the guy stating his case one more time would go any further to accomplishing it.
stabbim wrote:It ain't a binary proposition, you know. You think when he said this...Chuck wrote:For me to take people to task -- which I could have -- what would it have served? Nothing.
...that he was only talking about DDY?
3) Although the person was not directly named, there was that incident around EOTC (starting the bottom of p. 135 "I don't mind Chuck being gay. But he isn't going to be one of those Act Up guys, is he?" If that was DDY - again we don't know - I can see where that comment would really put him off. So in 1999 when the band decided to move on - if it was Dennis - he could get on with things. That next paragraph or two after that talks about how he buried it since he wanted to work.
styxfansite wrote:I was curious about who said this to. I was thinking if it was Dennis, he would have said his name, but since he didn't say a name it made me think it might be someone else in the band or someone that has left the band recently that he didn't want to say anything bad about. We know it probably was Tommy or John, because Tommy wasnt there and John is his brother.
That is my take on that.
StyxCollector wrote:stabbim wrote:Seems to me that CP has done that, and done it quite well. Don't know how having to sit through the guy stating his case one more time would go any further to accomplishing it.
I don't disagree Chuck has moved beyond it. Maybe DDY just wants closure and he thought that he could at least make peace with Chuck. Again, we don't know the motivation as to why Chuck was contacted.stabbim wrote:It ain't a binary proposition, you know. You think when he said this...Chuck wrote:For me to take people to task -- which I could have -- what would it have served? Nothing.
...that he was only talking about DDY?
Well, that I agree with. But I do also agree with Sterling here - although I liked the book, he tends to call out DDY more than JY, and largely gives the current band a big pass. In reading the book:
1) He doesn't seem to ever have a bad thing to say about Tommy, even back in the day. In fact, I would argue that Chuck and Tommy get along very well to this day. Evidence proves this.
2) His feelings towards DDY only changed truly around Cornerstone. In his early recounts, he seems much more "affectionate" (for lack of a better term) towards DDY. It's only when he brings Styx into the story around 1979 where you feel like something had changed in how he thought.
3) Although the person was not directly named, there was that incident around EOTC (starting the bottom of p. 135 "I don't mind Chuck being gay. But he isn't going to be one of those Act Up guys, is he?" If that was DDY - again we don't know - I can see where that comment would really put him off. So in 1999 when the band decided to move on - if it was Dennis - he could get on with things. That next paragraph or two after that talks about how he buried it since he wanted to work.
yogi wrote:What I find soo damn funny is that all through Chucks book( yea I read it, in the closet) he talks about not letting people in. How he tried to tackle everything by himself so not to burden others. Scared as hell how they would react to his situation. He states over and over how he regrets doing this. How he should of let those clse to him in.
How will he ever know what Dennis wanted. It could be that Dennis has read Chucks book, admires the shit out of his courage,apologize, or maybe he just wants to shake the hand of a once old friend.
It makes me really wonder who the close minded one is now??
As for me the most close minded people I have ever come across are those who are on a mission. Those who have found THEIR cause. Nothing else seems to matter anymore to most of them.
CDC fact: More women will die this year from Lung Cancer than Breast cancer. It has been that way for over 50 years yet.... this year we will spend over 50 times more money on breast cancer research than lung cancer research. CDC Fact: we spend over 2500 times more money on HIV & AIDS research than we do on researching and trying to find a cure for ALS paitients.
What's your cause????
Abortion anyone, Prayer in school, The war on terror, Astroturff vs Real grass...........????????
yogi wrote:We know EXACTALY what causes HIV and how to prevent its spread. Many of the people NOW who get the disease, get it through reckless behavior. So why do we spend 2500 times more money on this disease than a disease such as ALS??
The Gay community with their cause are a whole lot more powerful than individual families scattered throughout the US are with theirs.
Is this right????????
P.S. Chuck did talk fondly about the early days with the band( when they were kids)( you need a re read)
There will be a test on Tuesday.
stabbim wrote:I know a lot of folks here like to twist themselves into knots trying to appear impartial on that issue, believing that everything boils down to a two-way street or a matter of opinion, but sometimes it just ain't so.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests