Moderator: Andrew
styxfanNH wrote:"I'll see the guys stuffing themselves into skin-tight pants, putting on eyeliner and bleaching their hair," he says. "I'll kid them, 'So, exactly who's gay here?' "
Skates wrote:And you know if you actually read the book, Ash, you might get the context of the quote.
Skates wrote:And you know if you actually read the book, Ash, you might get the context of the quote.
And the article writer should have read it a little closer as well..."Mr. Robot tour"?
Skates wrote:And you know if you actually read the book, Ash, you might get the context of the quote.
And the article writer should have read it a little closer as well..."Mr. Robot tour"?
Rockwriter wrote:I still think if that material were re-slanted for Broadway, with real actors, and re-titled "Roboto", it could be a smash. The pop culture recognition factor is very high now.
Sterling
blt man wrote:Rockwriter wrote:I still think if that material were re-slanted for Broadway, with real actors, and re-titled "Roboto", it could be a smash. The pop culture recognition factor is very high now.
Sterling
Do you think JY and TS would really allow the songs they wrote to be used in a broadway production?
Ash wrote:Get a new argument - please. I have no interest in reading about the gay experience. Sorry. If I want to hear about the gay experience, I'll ask my friends - not some rock guy.
Zan wrote:Ash wrote:Get a new argument - please. I have no interest in reading about the gay experience. Sorry. If I want to hear about the gay experience, I'll ask my friends - not some rock guy.
Not to point out the bleeding obvious here, but it is you who keeps insisting on commenting about his "gay experience" (and anything he says regarding his "gay experience"), so I think we're at a stale mate, mate.
Rockwriter wrote:If it was something that could exponentially increase the visibility of the brand name Styx, the way 'Tommy' did for the Who or the Abba Broadway thing did, it would be hard to say no. But if they did object, let's face it, the only two songs that are widely known from that work are "Roboto" and "Don't Let It End", and "Roboto" is the only one that has any continuing pop culture impact. Dennis could drop the whole plot line that was a compromise with the group, return to his original vision, use "Roboto" to lead it off, and re-write the whole thing to replace the other songs. The average theatergoer certainly wouldn't know the difference, and at the same time, his original story notes were way better anyway than the goofy dumbed down version that ended up getting made. Hire some real actors and you might really have something. Not that this is ever going to happen, but if he decided to do that he would have financial backing by this time tomorrow because of the pop culture recognition factor and the fact that other rock/Broadway things have done so well. The theater demographic has changed dramatically in recent years.
StyxCollector wrote:Chuck's book isn't about "the gay experience" for heaven's sake ...It is not some sordid tale. It's just the story of his life. So what if he's gay? Why does that make a difference?
- there's now how-tos for fellatio, et al.
cittadeeno23 wrote:Sterling, I heard the original Kilroy story was much darker and much better.
Do you know the details of the original story?? I remember it being talked about in your book, but I don't remember anyone giving specific details as to what it was about.
Thanks
Jimmy
Ash wrote:Skates wrote:And you know if you actually read the book, Ash, you might get the context of the quote.
And the article writer should have read it a little closer as well..."Mr. Robot tour"?
Get a new argument - please. I have no interest in reading about the gay experience. Sorry. If I want to hear about the gay experience, I'll ask my friends - not some rock guy.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests