Moderator: Andrew
Dennis Hope wrote:
Do you know how to keep from getting charged for the ice below the floorboards of Chicago Stadium? Do you know how to do a headlining tour? Do you know Claire Rothman at the L.A. Forum? Do you know Bobbi Cowan, Lisa Robinson, Jim Ladd, Frank Barcelona? Do you know how you get a record not pressed but played? Do you know? I didn't invent the rainy day, man. I just own the best umbrella.
stmonkeys wrote:Yes, I realize that with styx it wasn't necessarily a management issue. But once they fired Derek, they continued on a downward path with releasing KWH, (a project we know the band wasn't comfortable with), embarked on a tour of theatres that lost millions of dollars, tried to recoup it with a stadium tour which prob relied too heavily on the KWH project, and released CITA, a live album that didn't really do them justice. I was just musing that it might have been the catalyst. we know the wheels were already in motion.
Rockwriter wrote:
Here's something I wish I had clarified a little bit more in my book. The KILROY tour did not lose money in the sense that, if the guys left home with 500 dollars, they did not go home with 498 dollars after the tour. When they say it "lost money", what they mean is that it "failed to gain all of the money it could have". Some dates actually did lose money, but some profited, and in the end there was a net profit, albeit a much smaller one than projected. When they say it lost money, they mean as compared to the previous tour in support of PT. It's like saying, well, we only made 500,000 dollars, instead of 1.5 million; therefore we lost a million dollars. But in fact you did not lose a million dollars; you profited 500,000 dollars and are choosing to see it in the most negative possible light.
I hope all is well.
Sterling
Blue Falcon wrote:Styx didn't have problems with their manager, as far as I know. JY ran most of the business side anyways. Styx's downfall was in part due to DDY's stubborn attempt to drag the band kicking and screaming in a different direction, and not necessarily a good one. But no one forced the other guys to stay in the band during that time, either.
Once DDY started writing Lawrence Welk-like tunes such as "Desert Moon" it was too late. I know I gave up on the band then and eventually burned my copy of Kilroy, polluting our atmosphere further.
kansas666 wrote:Derek Sutton mentioned that he had a 5 year plan for STYX but wasn't able to fulfill it when he was fired.
kansas666 wrote:I also found it very interesting the way he was fired.
kansas666 wrote:To paraphrase Sterling's book (sorry if I get this mostly wrong)
He mentioned that what he should have said was "we disagree on that"; but instead he said "P*ss off C%nt"
stmonkeys wrote:so, as you all know, i purchased Slash's autobiography last month. I was reading this particular paragraph, and figured i would share:
"If you run down the history of the demise of great rock bands, more often than not you'll discover that many of them dumped their original manager on their way to grasping the brass ring, and once they did, it all got f@cked up. I'm kind of pissed off that we followed that tradition.
As self-destructive as we may or may not have been, and despite the communication barriers between the members, we had the desire to play music and move forward at all costs. That an outside influence completely disrupted the band really is a shame."
pg 324
this reminded me of styx right after PT. a series of poor decisions between band members & management ultimately lead to the break up in 83. interesting to see that other bands have suffered the same outcome.
Monker wrote:Slash did a radio interview on local radio which I heard one morning on my way to work. He was asked several times about GnR. He did not want to give too much away because was to promote the book, not spoil all of its contents.
But, he ended up saying what killed GnR was that Axl wanted all rights to the band name. He basicaly wanted to buy the rights from the rest of the band so he controled everything. That is why Slash quit, and he implied this is why the original GnR will never reuinite.
This also may strike some comparisons to Styx and the constant power struggle with Dennis...and why there will never be another reunion.stmonkeys wrote:so, as you all know, i purchased Slash's autobiography last month. I was reading this particular paragraph, and figured i would share:
"If you run down the history of the demise of great rock bands, more often than not you'll discover that many of them dumped their original manager on their way to grasping the brass ring, and once they did, it all got f@cked up. I'm kind of pissed off that we followed that tradition.
As self-destructive as we may or may not have been, and despite the communication barriers between the members, we had the desire to play music and move forward at all costs. That an outside influence completely disrupted the band really is a shame."
pg 324
this reminded me of styx right after PT. a series of poor decisions between band members & management ultimately lead to the break up in 83. interesting to see that other bands have suffered the same outcome.
Monker wrote:
This also may strike some comparisons to Styx and the constant power struggle with Dennis...and why there will never be another reunion.
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:Monker wrote:
This also may strike some comparisons to Styx and the constant power struggle with Dennis...and why there will never be another reunion.
Never Say Never, trust me on that one, seriously! It's down to only one member, yep that's all........
Hey, the Jackson 5 are getting ready to tour again - LOL
styxfanNH wrote:
Wonder who that would be??? If Styx isn't going to record new music, then there really isn't a reason to stay apart other than one member hates another.
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:I wonder - LOL The other guys that are currently in the band and even Dennis & Glen have nothing to lose for a reunion, nothing!
OMG, I just wish these grown men would just realize life is SO short!! It seems everyone that is still alive and was popular in the 70's & the 80's are reuniting. The people our age are the ones that are going to see them and pay the big bucks and at the same time bring the next generation to show our kids the music we grew up with. I love taking my kids to see Dennis and other bands from when I was younger.
styxfanNH wrote:The number of dates would be an issue for Tommy and JY. It's not a money issue, they just like being out there performing. Dennis would never do a 100+ shows a year. I don't think that anyone here would deny that. The question is that if Dennis came back, would they be able to market those dates differently than dates without. Perhaps Styx with Dennis Seyoung vs Styx. Can't imaging that JY could stomach that marketing. Another alternative would be for Styx to do 50 - 60 dates with Dennis then Tommy doing a Damn Yankees thing or a Shaw Blades thing to supplement the dates. I don't think that would make JY very hapy though, not to mention the rest of the guys. Not to mention that I think what we are seeing with Shaw Blades now is the last we will see of them unless Styx/Damn Yankees are touring together or Styx/Night Ranger is touring together. The only exception to that would be if they opened for another group.
elmotano wrote:Have I missed something? Have Tommy or Jack, or any one in the know said that this Shaw Blades show will not go one? I know, when I saw them in April, they were talking about doing this every chance they get
elmotano wrote:styxfanNH wrote:The number of dates would be an issue for Tommy and JY. It's not a money issue, they just like being out there performing. Dennis would never do a 100+ shows a year. I don't think that anyone here would deny that. The question is that if Dennis came back, would they be able to market those dates differently than dates without. Perhaps Styx with Dennis Seyoung vs Styx. Can't imaging that JY could stomach that marketing. Another alternative would be for Styx to do 50 - 60 dates with Dennis then Tommy doing a Damn Yankees thing or a Shaw Blades thing to supplement the dates. I don't think that would make JY very hapy though, not to mention the rest of the guys. Not to mention that I think what we are seeing with Shaw Blades now is the last we will see of them unless Styx/Damn Yankees are touring together or Styx/Night Ranger is touring together. The only exception to that would be if they opened for another group.
Have I missed something? Have Tommy or Jack, or any one in the know said that this Shaw Blades show will not go one? I know, when I saw them in April, they were talking about doing this every chance they get
styxfanNH wrote:I heard from someone close to them that these dates are likely the last. Something to the effect of not tourig with your best friend if you want to stay best friends. Obviously it could change, but that is what I was told.
SuiteMadameBlue wrote:I wonder - LOL The other guys that are currently in the band and even Dennis & Glen have nothing to lose for a reunion, nothing!
OMG, I just wish these grown men would just realize life is SO short!! It seems everyone that is still alive and was popular in the 70's & the 80's are reuniting. The people our age are the ones that are going to see them and pay the big bucks and at the same time bring the next generation to show our kids the music we grew up with. I love taking my kids to see Dennis and other bands from when I was younger.
Zan wrote:styxfanNH wrote:I heard from someone close to them that these dates are likely the last. Something to the effect of not tourig with your best friend if you want to stay best friends. Obviously it could change, but that is what I was told.
Really, who? Because someone close to them told me that they had definite plans to continue these tour early into next year and whenever they could, and Tommy himself said right on stage that as long as people in my area were willing to come hear them play, they'd come down here.
styxfanNH wrote:Zan, I can't give up the contact because I don't want to loose the source.
stabbim wrote:styxfanNH wrote:Zan, I can't give up the contact because I don't want to loose the source.
So the "source" has no problem with you spilling all this info on a public message board, as long as they aren't named?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests