Moderator: Andrew
Voyager wrote:Vermont Town Votes on Bush 'Indictment'
"Our town attorney has no legal authority to draw up any papers to allow our police officers to do so," said Town Clerk Annette Cappy, "but the gentleman who initiated the petition got the signatures (and) wanted it on the ballot to make a statement."
Voyager wrote:I think they should take the vote nationwide and remove the bums. If Bill Clinton got impeached for getting a hummer
Voyager wrote:surely Bush and Cheney should be impeached for murdering thousands of soldiers and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens in a war that should never have been waged against a country that posed absolutely no threat to us.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama

Voyager wrote:Vermont Town Votes on Bush 'Indictment'
By JOHN CURRAN – 6 hours ago
BRATTLEBORO, Vt. (AP) — Voters in this southern Vermont town were deciding Tuesday whether to approve a measure calling for the indictment of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney on charges of violating the Constitution.
The symbolic article seeks to have police arrest Bush and Cheney if they ever visit Brattleboro or to extradite them for prosecution elsewhere — if they're not impeached first.
"Our town attorney has no legal authority to draw up any papers to allow our police officers to do so," said Town Clerk Annette Cappy, "but the gentleman who initiated the petition got the signatures (and) wanted it on the ballot to make a statement."
A steady stream of voters paraded into the Brattleboro Union High School gym to cast their ballots on a day when school board elections and Vermont's presidential primary were also on the slate.
Organizers of the indictment campaign were frustrated that the printed ballot ended up relegating the Bush-Cheney indictment article to the back side, which they said would cause some people to miss it.
The 8-by-14-inch yellow cardboard ballot listed the offices and candidates in the local election on one side, and at the bottom in block letters "Turn Ballot Over and Continue Voting."
"Turn Over Ballot and Indict Bush," read a 3-by-4-foot handmade picket sign carried by Kurt Daims, 54, who organized the petition drive and stood outside the school Tuesday.
Voters interviewed after casting ballots said they saw the article as an opportunity to express their frustration over the war in Iraq and Bush's tenure in general.
"I realize it's an extreme thing to do, and really silly in a way," said Robert George, 74, a retired photographer. "But I'm really angry about us getting involved in the war in Iraq and him (Bush) disrespecting the will of the people."
Ian Kelley, 41, a radio DJ, said he didn't vote on the article.
"It's not a good reflection on the town," he said. "Do I like either of them and would I vote for them? No. But I don't think it's cause to arrest them."
Barbara Southworth, a 66-year-old nurse, said she would have voted against it.
"I forgot to vote because it was on the flip side," she said.
Arkansas wrote:Death is always the answer.
Kill someone. Kill a career. Kill something!
Extremists want to take your life.
People that feel offended want you fired.
Political opposites want you impeached.
I'm offended. Off with their heads!
I'm offended! Fire them!
What's the worst we can do to someone or something? KILL.
Why is that always the answer?
What makes America more civil than any other culture?
later~
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Sounds like federalism in action to me.
Wait - let me guess. Modern day Conservatives now have a problem with that?
Voyager wrote:"I realize it's an extreme thing to do, and really silly in a way," said Robert George, 74, a retired photographer. "But I'm really angry about us getting involved in the war in Iraq and him (Bush) disrespecting the will of the people."
conversationpc wrote:It's a waste of taxpayer dollars. Then again, I guess liberals enjoy that, don't they?
conversationpc wrote:I got a kick out of this comment, considering approximately 70% of "the people" were for the war when it began.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:conversationpc wrote:It's a waste of taxpayer dollars. Then again, I guess liberals enjoy that, don't they?
Upholding the Constitution, if only in empty gesture, is never a waste.
Furthermore, I wasn't aware you were a Vermont resident, Dave.
Just what the fuck do u care how those syrup guzzlers spend their money?
conversationpc wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Sounds like federalism in action to me.
Wait - let me guess. Modern day Conservatives now have a problem with that?
It's a waste of taxpayer dollars. Then again, I guess liberals enjoy that, don't they?

Rockindeano wrote:Yet it was ok for Kenneth Starr to spend 55 million dollars on a Hummer.
Bush and Cheney should be in jail.
So my not being a Vermont resident somehow disqualifies me from having an opinion? How democratic of you, o exalted taco. Seems like I've seen you give opinions on things happening in other parts of the country, including this very thread.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:No, but as a self-styled "Conservative" you should have a deep reverence for federalism, and the the rights of states to make their own laws.
Most of you assholes don't even understand the very political lens which supposedly informs your world view.
You're just Bush whores.
conversationpc wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:conversationpc wrote:It's a waste of taxpayer dollars. Then again, I guess liberals enjoy that, don't they?
Upholding the Constitution, if only in empty gesture, is never a waste.
Upholding the Constitution my ass. They have neither the authority nor the wherewithal to follow through on this.Furthermore, I wasn't aware you were a Vermont resident, Dave.
Just what the fuck do u care how those syrup guzzlers spend their money?
So my not being a Vermont resident somehow disqualifies me from having an opinion? How democratic of you, o exalted taco.:D Seems like I've seen you give opinions on things happening in other parts of the country, including this very thread.

Voyager wrote:I think they should take the vote nationwide and remove the bums. If Bill Clinton got impeached for getting a hummer, surely Bush and Cheney should be impeached for murdering thousands of soldiers and hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi citizens in a war that should never have been waged against a country that posed absolutely no threat to us.
2009 can't get here fast enough.

conversationpc wrote:If they want to make their own laws fine but how about actually making laws that can actually accomplish something. WASTE...OF...TIME.
Yeah, I know. If you agree with Bush on just one issue, that makes you a Bush whore no matter how often you disagree with him. Seems like liberals like yourself forget how to read and/or understand English when someone agrees with the guy in even the smallest way. Get off your self-made pedestal.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:conversationpc wrote:If they want to make their own laws fine but how about actually making laws that can actually accomplish something. WASTE...OF...TIME.
Not for you to say. It's their state.Yeah, I know. If you agree with Bush on just one issue, that makes you a Bush whore no matter how often you disagree with him. Seems like liberals like yourself forget how to read and/or understand English when someone agrees with the guy in even the smallest way. Get off your self-made pedestal.
Continued tax cuts for the uber-wealthy? Check.
Unjustified imperialist war without end? Check.
Stem cell research obstruction? Check.
And it goes on and on....
You do not agree with Bush on one singular issue. You agree with him on ALL of them. Even ones yet conjured by the twisted machinations of his crack-addled brain. In fact, during his years in office, Bush delivered a veritable Conservative Christmas wishlist, and yet still u bitch and wail. If its not Clinton's fault, it's the resident Dem congress with the slightest of hair's breadth majorities. Face it: Conservatism has failed.

RossValoryRocks wrote:Bush is NOT a conservative...in any way shape or form...except in cutting taxes...and the former Republican Congress was worse...SPEND SPEND SPEND. A group of idiots who got what they deserved...uninvited back to the dance.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:RossValoryRocks wrote:Bush is NOT a conservative...in any way shape or form...except in cutting taxes...and the former Republican Congress was worse...SPEND SPEND SPEND. A group of idiots who got what they deserved...uninvited back to the dance.
Increasingly, that's the platform of the modern Conservative movement.
Just the other day there was a "conservative" on here, praising no-bid billion dollar giveaway contracts to Haliburton.
Now tell me, just what the fuck is Conservative about that?

The_Noble_Cause wrote:conversationpc wrote:If they want to make their own laws fine but how about actually making laws that can actually accomplish something. WASTE...OF...TIME.
Not for you to say. It's their state.
Continued tax cuts for the uber-wealthy? Check.
Unjustified imperialist war without end? Check.
Stem cell research obstruction? Check.
You do not agree with Bush on one singular issue. You agree with him on ALL of them. Even ones yet conjured by the twisted machinations of his crack-addled brain. In fact, during his years in office, Bush delivered a veritable Conservative Christmas wishlist, and yet still u bitch and wail. If its not Clinton's fault, it's the resident Dem congress with the slightest of hair's breadth majorities. Face it: Conservatism has failed.
RossValoryRocks wrote:I should remind you that Clinton started that particular Haliburton bid thing..but I won't...
The_Noble_Cause wrote:No, but as a self-styled "Conservative" you should have a deep reverence for federalism, and the the rights of states to make their own laws.
conversationpc wrote:Voyager wrote:"I realize it's an extreme thing to do, and really silly in a way," said Robert George, 74, a retired photographer. "But I'm really angry about us getting involved in the war in Iraq and him (Bush) disrespecting the will of the people."
I got a kick out of this comment, considering approximately 70% of "the people" were for the war when it began.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests