Van Halen have become the latest rockers to upset presidential candidate John McCain's campaign trail by insisting he stops using one of their songs at political rallies.
McCain used Van Halen's Right Now during a speech he made in Ohio on Friday August 29. And the band has been quick to point out that neither the senator nor his campaign bosses had the the Ok to play it.
A spokesman for the group's management tells Tmz.com "Permission was not sought or granted, nor would it have been given
--------------------------------------
Jackson Browne Sues McCain For Using His Song In An Ad Without Permission
from the legal-complexities dept
What is it with politicians who position themselves being big pro-copyright supporters being caught potentially infringing on copyright themselves? Singer Jackson Browne, who is apparently a supporter of Senator Obama's presidential campaign, has sued Senator McCain for allegedly using a Browne song in an advertisement without permission. Of course, this isn't as clear cut as you might believe. McCain's campaign points out that the ad isn't actually from the campaign. And, while it's true that there's no compulsory license for pairing a song with a video, this is almost certainly infringement -- but Browne's claim of an implied endorsement may not get very far, because there are ways that it's quite likely that McCain could make use of Browne's song without Browne's permission.
Welcome to the bizarre, arcane, and confusing world of copyright licenses.
Depending on whether or not Browne's music is licensed to a performance rights organization like ASCAP, BMI or SESAC (and chances are, they are), McCain's campaign could most likely pay a royalty to them to use one of Browne's songs at an event (if not in a commercial). And, since there is compulsory licensing on covers of songs, in theory, McCain's campaign could have someone else cover Browne's song at a campaign stop, and Browne wouldn't have much he could do to stop it (again, other than make a stink out of it, getting McCain to back down). While it does seem as though there is an infringement claim here (and McCain's campaign knows it's not wise to turn this into a big deal), this story does highlight just how ridiculous various music licensing has become these days. Though, still, in general you would think that any political campaign (or its surrogates) would at least be a little careful to avoid using music from someone who supports the other guy -- as it's just asking for a PR headache.
----------------
Heart attack on McCain
By Knute Berger
I saw this coming. Last night after John McCain's GOP convention speech, the hall was blasted with the sounds of Seattle band Heart's rocker "Barracuda," which became the convention's theme music for Sarah "Barracuda" Palin (Barracuda was a high-school nickname). I figured an objection would be raised.
It has been. The Wilsons have asked the McCain campaign to stop using the song. "We have asked the Republican campaign publicly not to use our music. We hope our wishes will be honored," they said in a statement, according to TMZ. One reason could be that the sisters' political persuasion runs in a different direction. I remember them warming up the crowd for Bill Clinton at the Pike Place Market back in the '90s.
Rock songs used in campaigns have been controversial this season. John Mellencamp asked McCain to stop playing his songs, like "Our Country," at rallies earlier this year. McCain agreed. I can see why campaigns do this: rock anthems and pop and country songs can create mood and glow and even help define candidates, sometimes with unintended consequences.
I was amazed at the level of narcissism displayed by Joe Lieberman during his GOP convention speech. ("Thank you so very much for that warm welcome. You'd have to be me to know how much I appreciate it.") I commented on this to a guy who had volunteered for Lieberman during one of his Connecticut Senate campaigns, and he told me that Lieberman's self-love runs deep. His campaign song of choice: Sinatra's "My Way."
Campaign rock is designed to make a political statement, and there's an implied endorsement on the part of the artist — that's the subliminal effect, anyway. I don't blame bands and singers for getting pissed off. At the very least, they ought to get paid the same way they get big bucks for providing soundtracks for commercials. Presidential campaigns are multimillion-dollar efforts to brand and move product. There would be money in it for the bands and a degree of ambiguity. You'd never know if a tune expressed the artist's politics, or if it was simply a way to fill the bank account.

