Moderator: Andrew
Zan wrote:That was as many as you could think of? lol
I think you should have a "best of" poll as well.
For example, as much as love Peter Gabriel (and I really do), I think Phil Collins was a fantastic replacement.
Ash wrote:Who is the worst "replacement" singer in rock history? Forget their talent playing an instrument, I'm thinking just about singing ability in comparison to the guy they replaced. Vote. I tried to include as many as I could think of.
Zan wrote:That was as many as you could think of? lol
I think you should have a "best of" poll as well.
For example, as much as love Peter Gabriel (and I really do), I think Phil Collins was a fantastic replacement.
stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
froy wrote:Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
Paul Rogers was great with Queen
Awesome concert
Zan wrote:Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
You didn't specify "replacement of original singer" in the poll. I think Cherone would get my vote too, but I voted for Boston.
Zan wrote:Ash wrote:stmonkeys wrote:you don't have Gary Cherone for Van Halen. much worse a replacement for DLR than Hagar. (nothing against gary, he's a great singer. just better in extreme)
CHerone replaced Hagar - not Roth. That's why I didn't include him
You didn't specify "replacement of original singer" in the poll. I think Cherone would get my vote too, but I voted for Boston.
Ehwmatt wrote:Most, if not all on this list are excellent singers and fit their bands well. People like Hagar shouldn't even be considered "replacement singers," as the band had success with him all their own. Not to mention he's a far better singer than DLR. If you're going to include VH, it should be Gary Cherone. He did nothing with the band and that album was pretty shitty. Even still, he's a great singer, just the wrong fit. Even someone as maligned as Gowan isn't in the band to just sing - guy's a great keys player.
Just from this list, I'd have to say Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers sucks with Queen, but rocks with Bad Company, Free, and Jimmy Page.
stmonkeys wrote:george michael SHOULD have fronted queen instead of paul rogers.
Ash wrote:Who is the worst "replacement" singer in rock history? Forget their talent playing an instrument, I'm thinking just about singing ability in comparison to the guy they replaced. Vote. I tried to include as many as I could think of.
MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
yogi wrote:' You cant replace a dead person'
What does that mean???????
Death counts!!!!!
P.S. The George Michael 'Tie Your Brother Down' was pretty funny
Still..... Death Counts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MCM wrote:Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
That's him, so memorable I couldn't even remember his name.
Zan wrote:MCM wrote:Zan wrote:MCM wrote:The poll doesn't include the Vince Neil replacement, don't even remember his name.
John Corabi
That's him, so memorable I couldn't even remember his name.
LOL...I only know who he is because he did a double-bill with Glen Burtnik in Atlanta this past October. He was actually VERY good. And the guitarist he had with him was sensational. They were a bit like Shaw-Blades, only edgier and with more tats & eyeliner. lol
See?
|
|
v
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests