President Barack Obama - Term 1 and 2 Thread

[RedWingFan]

Seeing Russia from their porch.

Don't tell me you can't tell a skit from "Saturday Night Live" from real life Dean?

sucking off men in St Paul's Airport

What you do on vacation is your business dude!

lying to the American people about a bullshit war

Don't forget doctoring intelligence from several other nations! And putting Saddam's own word in his mouth, stating how he couldn't let it be known he didn't have WMD's because of his fear of Iran! Man that Bush knew how to get stuff done, unlike Obama!

naming CIA agents because her husband exposed your lies and deceit

A-R-M-I-T-A-G-E.....Sorry again Dean!

Gotta say, this is by far, the best thread on this Forum. This forum is terrible nowadays, but we can have our own littel area.

Scott, I like you, and you can do soooo much better than this. Just be thankful Obama doesn't want to prosecute Cheney, libby and those guys....Emanuel does. Hell awaits those scumbags anyway.

Oh, I'm not putting it past them. All Obama's done, has run this place like its a banana republic, third world country. Him trying to prosecute would be so like him. All he's ever done in his political career is clear the playing field, why should he change now? I'm truly embarrassed for America!

[Rockindeano]

I guess I got defeated by two people who side with a party that has gotten its collective ass beat in the last two elections.

See, I don't have to explain anything. I am on the good side...you fuckers are on the evil side...and yes, I firmly believe republicans, the powers that be in the republican party that is(not you folks personally), are evil motherfuckers. But I guess I am defeated so I guess we will cease to debate further. My BA in Poly Sci is worthless I guess.

[treetopovskaya]

No you/re anal retentive typing style doesn't fit Gideon at all...you stupid piece of cum. Y'all need to get out of kentucker and expand your Nalledge.

better be careful Giduncan...Kentucky isn't exactly deep red any more...in fact it's very pink. I would laugh my ass off if Obama got KY next time out.

Thanks for playing, Deano. You've shown us all that you're nothing but fluff [and very cheap and practically unfunny jokes]. Although, I must say, I find this entire situation quite ironic, but that's a different story.

What's life like knowing that you can't rightfully defend your own opinions?

One thing I've learned, when people can't defend an opinion without insults and name calling, they know they are defeated from the get-go.

+1

[Deacon]

I guess I got defeated by two people who side with a party that has gotten its collective ass beat in the last two elections.

No, you defeated yourself by resorting to moronic actions, laden with stupidity, smothered in idiocy, and covered in hypocrisy.

See, I don't have to explain anything.

When you state something as though it is a fact, yes, you do.

Where did you get the assumption that Crowley thought what he did?

I am on the good side...you fuckers are on the evil side...

LOL

and yes, I firmly believe republicans, the powers that be in the republican party that is(not you folks personally), are evil motherfuckers. But I guess I am defeated so I guess we will cease to debate further. My BA in Poly Sci is worthless I guess.

Yeah, it is if you can't understand the basic fundamentals of politics and debating.

[RaisedOnRadio92]

I guess I got defeated by two people who side with a party that has gotten its collective ass beat in the last two elections.

See, I don't have to explain anything. I am on the good side...you fuckers are on the evil side...and yes, I firmly believe republicans, the powers that be in the republican party that is(not you folks personally), are evil motherfuckers. But I guess I am defeated so I guess we will cease to debate further. My BA in Poly Sci is worthless I guess.

Still bitter that the best your party can puke out over the last 9 years is Gore, Kerry, Pelosi and Obama?

Ralph Nader has a better chance of success than that group of characters.

[RedWingFan]

Oh, man. This is embarrassing!!!
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - How much are politicians straining to convince people that the government is stimulating the economy? In Oregon, where lawmakers are spending $176 million to supplement the federal stimulus, Democrats are taking credit for a remarkable feat: creating 3,236 new jobs in the program's first three months.
But those jobs lasted on average only 35 hours, or about one work week. After that, those workers were effectively back unemployed, according to an Associated Press analysis of state spending and hiring data. By the state's accounting, a job is a job, whether it lasts three hours, three days, three months, or a lifetime.

Thanks Bamster!!!

[RaisedOnRadio92]

Oh, man. This is embarrassing!!!
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id ... _article=1

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - How much are politicians straining to convince people that the government is stimulating the economy? In Oregon, where lawmakers are spending $176 million to supplement the federal stimulus, Democrats are taking credit for a remarkable feat: creating 3,236 new jobs in the program's first three months.
But those jobs lasted on average only 35 hours, or about one work week. After that, those workers were effectively back unemployed, according to an Associated Press analysis of state spending and hiring data. By the state's accounting, a job is a job, whether it lasts three hours, three days, three months, or a lifetime.

Thanks Bamster!!!

But he'll get credit for creating those jobs. And people will be suckers for it. But hey, who cares?

[Blueskies]

No you/re anal retentive typing style doesn't fit Gideon at all...you stupid piece of cum. Y'all need to get out of kentucker and expand your Nalledge.

better be careful Giduncan...Kentucky isn't exactly deep red any more...in fact it's very pink. I would laugh my ass off if Obama got KY next time out.

Thanks for playing, Deano. You've shown us all that you're nothing but fluff [and very cheap and practically unfunny jokes]. Although, I must say, I find this entire situation quite ironic, but that's a different story.

What's life like knowing that you can't rightfully defend your own opinions?

One thing I've learned, when people can't defend an opinion without insults and name calling, they know they are defeated from the get-go.

Did you not tell a couple people to go choke on their own _____ " in the previous two pages? ...hey...if you're going to use what you just said as a weapon you should have at least waited awhile until
the smoke from your own grenades dissipated and the evidence was deeply covered up.

[RaisedOnRadio92]

The guy has a friggin Taco for a profile pic! He can choke on it! ROFL!

[Rockindeano]

I guess I got defeated by two people who side with a party that has gotten its collective ass beat in the last two elections.

See, I don't have to explain anything. I am on the good side...you fuckers are on the evil side...and yes, I firmly believe republicans, the powers that be in the republican party that is(not you folks personally), are evil motherfuckers. But I guess I am defeated so I guess we will cease to debate further. My BA in Poly Sci is worthless I guess.

Still bitter that the best your party can puke out over the last 9 years is Gore, Kerry, Pelosi and Obama?

Ralph Nader has a better chance of success than that group of characters.

That's your argument? Al Gore is a good man. John Kerry is a good man. BOTH served their country. Last time I checked, George w Bush and good ol Dick Cheney didn't. Nancy Pelosi sucks. I cannot stand her. Obama is a fine man. I also noticed you left out the ultimate republican killer, Mr. Bill Clinton.

I will stack Bill, Al, Kerry, and Obama against Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld. You think if you put that up for polling you'd win?

Scoreboard, you LOSE again.

[Blueskies]

The guy has a friggin Taco for a profile pic! He can choke on it! ROFL!

So what you're saying is you can't defend and were defeated at the get-go?!

[treetopovskaya]

<--- adores al gore }:C)

[Deacon]

I also noticed you left out the ultimate republican killer, Mr. Bill Clinton.

I see that we're talking about military service. Care to elaborate Mr. Clinton's stature on that?

[Blueskies]

One thing I've learned, when people can't defend an opinion without insults and name calling, they know they are defeated from the get-go.

Well of course. That's all Deano has in his arsenal, especially when he knows he blatantly lied.

A quote of yours from a couple pages ago......
"Technically, you did leave yourself wide open. Deano is a prick, though."

Not taking sides here..just keeping it real guys.....like I said , if you're going to use something then at least wait until the evidence of your assault is well hidden and not still in plain view.

[Deacon]

One thing I've learned, when people can't defend an opinion without insults and name calling, they know they are defeated from the get-go.

Well of course. That's all Deano has in his arsenal, especially when he knows he blatantly lied.

A quote of yours from a couple pages ago......
"Technically, you did leave yourself wide open. Deano is a prick, though."

Not taking sides here..just keeping it real guys.....like I said , if you're going to use something then at least wait until the evidence of your assault is well hidden and not still in plain view.

That was a jest. Are you purposefully leaving out the ? EDIT: And, better yet, the ?

[Rockindeano]

I also noticed you left out the ultimate republican killer, Mr. Bill Clinton.

I see that we're talking about military service. Care to elaborate Mr. Clinton's stature on that?

No, I wasn't talking exclusively Military service. I was trying to emphasize that Hawks, like Cheney and bush and Wolfowitz LOVE war, but don't like going to war or even enlisting. Yea, W enlisted and i am not positive on Wolfowitz, but Cheney, Hannity and Rush never saw a military uniform. As for Clinton, he didn't serve, but he did go on record as opposing the war and being an objector to said military at that time. My point was people think republicans support the military better than Dems, but truth is Dems seem to actually walk the walk and serve. Kerry won 3 purple hearts. Say what you will about the man, but I call that ballsy and heroic.

[Blueskies]

One thing I've learned, when people can't defend an opinion without insults and name calling, they know they are defeated from the get-go.

Well of course. That's all Deano has in his arsenal, especially when he knows he blatantly lied.

A quote of yours from a couple pages ago......
"Technically, you did leave yourself wide open. Deano is a prick, though."

Not taking sides here..just keeping it real guys.....like I said , if you're going to use something then at least wait until the evidence of your assault is well hidden and not still in plain view.

That was a jest. Are you purposefully leaving out the ? EDIT: And, better yet, the ?

Ohhhhhh...ok...a qualifier...that makes it different...somehow.

...heres the extra one I owe you >

[Deacon]

No, I wasn't talking exclusively Military service. I was trying to emphasize that Hawks, like Cheney and bush and Wolfowitz LOVE war, but don't like going to war or even enlisting. Yea, W enlisted and i am not positive on Wolfowitz, but Cheney, Hannity and Rush never saw a military uniform. As for Clinton, he didn't serve, but he did go on record as opposing the war and being an objector to said military at that time. My point was people think republicans support the military better than Dems, but truth is Dems seem to actually walk the walk and serve. Kerry won 3 purple hearts. Say what you will about the man, but I call that ballsy and heroic.

If you're not exclusively discussing military, then you're willingly admitting that all of the aforementioned men and women have publicly served their country. Was Clinton not a dodger, never minding his conscientious objections?

[Deacon]

Ohhhhhh...ok...a qualifier...that makes it different...somehow.

...heres the extra one I owe you >

It makes the contexts different.

[Blueskies]

Ohhhhhh...ok...a qualifier...that makes it different...somehow.

...heres the extra one I owe you >

It makes the contexts different.

Calling someone a " prick" is justifiable as long as it's in context to the discussion? How is that different then Deano or TNC saying it or using any other names in the " context" of their "discussion"?? You're argument here is hanging by a very slim...frazzled and about to break thread....you need to find a rope....because you may be hanging yourself here.

[Deacon]

Calling someone a " prick" is justifiable as long as it's in context to the discussion? How is that different then Deano saying it or using any other names ? You're argument here is hanging by a very slim...frazzled and about to break thread....you need to find a rope....because you may be hanging yourself here.

You obviously didn't understand me, then. I'll elaborate:

I called Deano a prick, in which the intent of jest was obvious. The emotes, and respectively, were used, which changed the context of the statement to a joke. The difference between my statement and Deano's usage of those colorful, yet highly inappropriate terms, is that I didn't use mine to attempt to falsely enhance my argument. I used a joke. If you can't see that by now, then you're not going to. Simple enough.

[Blueskies]

Calling someone a " prick" is justifiable as long as it's in context to the discussion? How is that different then Deano saying it or using any other names ? You're argument here is hanging by a very slim...frazzled and about to break thread....you need to find a rope....because you may be hanging yourself here.

You obviously didn't understand me, then. I'll elaborate:

I called Deano a prick, in which the intent of jest was obvious. The emotes, and respectively, were used, which changed the context of the statement to a joke. The difference between my statement and Deano's usage of those colorful, yet highly inappropriate terms, is that I didn't use mine to attempt to falsely enhance my argument. I used a joke. If you can't see that by now, then you're not going to. Simple enough.

sorry, kiddo...you're just trying to qualify your use of an inappropriate term by putting it into " context" and categorize it. Winks make "prick" somehow more acceptable? I have been on this board a long time now and Deano rarely uses emoticons.
He has said over the top outrageous things many times without a wink but it was intended as a joke as well. I'm not saying I agree with all the name calling, I don't.....and I have been called just about every name someone could think of at one time or another by many on here. I'm not trying to justify Deanos use....I was pointing out that you doing the same thing...wink or not....is you telling him do as I say not as I do. I would say that a none use of "colorful" terms would enhance your argument that your making....but jest or not ... your use does not make you better. I think it's hysterical for you to even say..." Hey, my name calling is all right if I put a wink behind it and just flat out call him a "prick" and not do it within a paragraph....so that way it's out of context and not an "enhancement"!!....Ridiculous!

Yeah, baby, winkies make it all good and proper.

[Rockindeano]

Calling someone a " prick" is justifiable as long as it's in context to the discussion? How is that different then Deano saying it or using any other names ? You're argument here is hanging by a very slim...frazzled and about to break thread....you need to find a rope....because you may be hanging yourself here.

You obviously didn't understand me, then. I'll elaborate:

I called Deano a prick, in which the intent of jest was obvious. The emotes, and respectively, were used, which changed the context of the statement to a joke. The difference between my statement and Deano's usage of those colorful, yet highly inappropriate terms, is that I didn't use mine to attempt to falsely enhance my argument. I used a joke. If you can't see that by now, then you're not going to. Simple enough.

sorry, kiddo...you're just trying to qualify your use of an inappropriate term by putting it into " context" and categorize it. Winks make "prick" somehow more acceptable? I have been on this board a long time now and Deano rarely uses emoticons.
He has said over the top outrageous things many times without a wink but it was intended as a joke as well. I'm not saying I agree with all the name calling, I don't.....and I have been called just about every name someone could think of at one time or another by many on here. I'm not trying to justify Deanos use....I was pointing out that you doing the same thing...wink or not....is you telling him do as I say not as I do. I would say that a none use of "colorful" terms would enhance your argument that your making....but jest or not does your use does not make you better. I think it's hysterical for you to even say..." Hey, my name calling is all right if I put a wink behind it and just flat out call him a "prick" and not do it within a paragraph....so that way it's out of context"!!....Ridiculous!

Yeah, baby winkies make it all good and proper.

I rarely use emoticons and NEVER bust out that faggy wink emo. I mean what I say. No winks needed. If you guys don't like the way I write, fuck me and move on. I don't know what to tell ya..I have a style, a very unique one I'm told and it's the only way i know how to write. It is what it is.

[Blueskies]

Calling someone a " prick" is justifiable as long as it's in context to the discussion? How is that different then Deano saying it or using any other names ? You're argument here is hanging by a very slim...frazzled and about to break thread....you need to find a rope....because you may be hanging yourself here.

You obviously didn't understand me, then. I'll elaborate:

I called Deano a prick, in which the intent of jest was obvious. The emotes, and respectively, were used, which changed the context of the statement to a joke. The difference between my statement and Deano's usage of those colorful, yet highly inappropriate terms, is that I didn't use mine to attempt to falsely enhance my argument. I used a joke. If you can't see that by now, then you're not going to. Simple enough.

sorry, kiddo...you're just trying to qualify your use of an inappropriate term by putting it into " context" and categorize it. Winks make "prick" somehow more acceptable? I have been on this board a long time now and Deano rarely uses emoticons.
He has said over the top outrageous things many times without a wink but it was intended as a joke as well. I'm not saying I agree with all the name calling, I don't.....and I have been called just about every name someone could think of at one time or another by many on here. I'm not trying to justify Deanos use....I was pointing out that you doing the same thing...wink or not....is you telling him do as I say not as I do. I would say that a none use of "colorful" terms would enhance your argument that your making....but jest or not does your use does not make you better. I think it's hysterical for you to even say..." Hey, my name calling is all right if I put a wink behind it and just flat out call him a "prick" and not do it within a paragraph....so that way it's out of context"!!....Ridiculous!

Yeah, baby winkies make it all good and proper.

I rarely use emoticons and NEVER bust out that faggy wink emo. I mean what I say. No winks needed. If you guys don't like the way I write, fuck me and move on. I don't know what to tell ya..I have a style, a very unique one I'm told and it's the only way i know how to write. It is what it is.

Yeah, Deacon...if youre going to say something then own your words...don't try to " qualify" your actions to somehow make it better. There is no way to qualify the word "prick" so if youre going to call someone one then just flat out say it with gusto and own up to it. just don't pretend that its somehow excusable if you do it and not when someone else does.

[Deacon]

sorry, kiddo...you're just trying to qualify your use of an inappropriate term by putting it into " context" and categorize it. Winks make "prick" somehow more acceptable? I have been on this board a long time now and Deano rarely uses emoticons.
He has said over the top outrageous things many times without a wink but it was intended as a joke as well. I'm not saying I agree with all the name calling, I don't.....and I have been called just about every name someone could think of at one time or another by many on here. I'm not trying to justify Deanos use....I was pointing out that you doing the same thing...wink or not....is you telling him do as I say not as I do. I would say that a none use of "colorful" terms would enhance your argument that your making....but jest or not ... your use does not make you better. I think it's hysterical for you to even say..." Hey, my name calling is all right if I put a wink behind it and just flat out call him a "prick" and not do it within a paragraph....so that way it's out of context and not an "enhancement"!!....Ridiculous!

Yeah, baby, winkies make it all good and proper.

The emboldened is the entirety of the context of what you just stated. The rest is fluff, unnecessary.

If he uses it as a joke, that's fine. Context is everything and you're not understanding it.

This isn't my problem anymore because I'm tired and I'm going to bed.

Good night, and [not to steal from Weekend Report...] have a pleasant tomorrow.

[Deacon]

Yeah, Deacon...if youre going to say something then own your words...don't try to " qualify" your actions to somehow make it better. There is no way to qualify the word "prick" so if youre going to call someone one then just flat out say it with gusto and own up to it. just don't pretend that its somehow excusable if you do it and not when someone else does.

One last thing.

Thanks for proving that you don't know contextual [dis-]agreements.

[Rockindeano]

Yeah, Deacon...if youre going to say something then own your words...don't try to " qualify" your actions to somehow make it better. There is no way to qualify the word "prick" so if youre going to call someone one then just flat out say it with gusto and own up to it. just don't pretend that its somehow excusable if you do it and not when someone else does.

One last thing.

Thanks for proving that you don't know contextual [dis-]agreements.

You're a fuckin nerd, albeit a smart one. Teach that underage douchedick ROR what it means to have a take and not to suck. He is fuckin clueless. I see he frequents the Journeymccafe or whatever the fuck that gay place calls it. Jesus Christ and three sisters on periods, who the hell spends time on the official journey site? I'd rather watch Jason troll for online cock than see those HR PuffnStuff behemoth bitches make countless roundtrips for X-large milkshakes and quarter pounders, then wear the fuckin wax off the floor as they make their way to the shitters. Hell, that ought to be one of the 7 wonders of the world- a Backtalkers hefty toilet deposit. I would love to know how much one of those BT shits actually weigh.

[Blueskies]

sorry, kiddo...you're just trying to qualify your use of an inappropriate term by putting it into " context" and categorize it. Winks make "prick" somehow more acceptable? I have been on this board a long time now and Deano rarely uses emoticons.
He has said over the top outrageous things many times without a wink but it was intended as a joke as well. I'm not saying I agree with all the name calling, I don't.....and I have been called just about every name someone could think of at one time or another by many on here. I'm not trying to justify Deanos use....I was pointing out that you doing the same thing...wink or not....is you telling him do as I say not as I do. I would say that a none use of "colorful" terms would enhance your argument that your making....but jest or not ... your use does not make you better. I think it's hysterical for you to even say..." Hey, my name calling is all right if I put a wink behind it and just flat out call him a "prick" and not do it within a paragraph....so that way it's out of context and not an "enhancement"!!....Ridiculous!

Yeah, baby, winkies make it all good and proper.

The emboldened is the entirety of the context of what you just stated. The rest is fluff, unnecessary.

If he uses it as a joke, that's fine. Context is everything and you're not understanding it.

This isn't my problem anymore because I'm tired and I'm going to bed.

Good night, and [not to steal from Weekend Report...] have a pleasant tomorrow.

LOL!
No, you're not understanding.....you are trying to qualify your use as a joke which makes it alright..in your mind..and he could say the same, that his intent was in jest. Hey, ...can't believe I'm going to write this here because I don't normally use this word....BUT...a prick is a prick...joking or not calling someone a prick is just what it is..." I think you are a prick". going to retreat...cough, cough....excuse me...I mean going to bed? Thought I was smelling defeet...must have taken your shoes off already. nighty, night, punkin.

[Blueskies]

Yeah, Deacon...if youre going to say something then own your words...don't try to " qualify" your actions to somehow make it better. There is no way to qualify the word "prick" so if youre going to call someone one then just flat out say it with gusto and own up to it. just don't pretend that its somehow excusable if you do it and not when someone else does.

One last thing.

Thanks for proving that you don't know contextual [dis-]agreements.

I understand that you are trying hard to qualify it as such. Trying to and achieving that objective are two different things. Keep reaching, though.

[G.I.Jim]

Yeah, Deacon...if youre going to say something then own your words...don't try to " qualify" your actions to somehow make it better. There is no way to qualify the word "prick" so if youre going to call someone one then just flat out say it with gusto and own up to it. just don't pretend that its somehow excusable if you do it and not when someone else does.

One last thing.

Thanks for proving that you don't know contextual [dis-]agreements.

I understand that you are trying hard to qualify it as such. Trying to and achieving that objective are two different things. Keep reaching, though.

BS... have you noticed that all you have done in this ENTIRE thread, is make snide comments about one person's posts to another? You haven't offered up one point that adds to either side of this conversation! You could try posting something yourself, and expressing an opinion. Just saying...