Gunbot wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:Rockindeano wrote:kgdjpubs wrote:ScarabGator wrote:Journey doesnt need to retire-they need to regroup. If Steve Perry was still in the band and they were playing major arenas like Bon Jovi and Springsteen no way the Journey name makes that list.
Everytime you hear about Journey and arnie that damn youtube story comes up...again and again..thats all they will ever be known for now. Not Open Arms, DSB, WITS, but the damn youtube singer!!
what do you expect? It's the first hard rock band to go international.
Who in the FUCK are you talking about? Journey? Hard rock? Hard pop yes maybe, but definitely not hard rock. Hell, they may not even be a rock band period.
I'd think you could safely call them rock--especially the live show. Hard rock at times, though that might be a stretch given today's usage of the term--even though it was probably more accurate circa 1983. The definition of "hard rock" has changed quite a bit since the early 80s.
What you are conveniently overlooking is the point I was making in that they are the first band to go overseas to the East (ie Japan, China, Phillipines) for a singer. It's pretty big in the grand scheme of things, not to mention
the monetary rewards that come with such a decision.
As far as I can see, in the Asian market, the monetary rewards are yet to really see fruition. The Police, Bon Jovi, Bill Joel, Avril Lavine, Back Street Boys, and Aerosmith all have played the Tokyo Dome the last few years. That place seats 50k plus. That's more fans in one show than Journey had for their entire Asian tour, including the 25k from Manila. Without all the extra travel expenses associated with playing in the other places you mentioned, those other bands made a lot more money from one or two shows at the EGG then Journey did during their whole Asia tour.
Despite all the festivals played in Europe and the Asian gigs, Journey did not break the top 25 in touring this year, something they had done the last two tours, even with different lead singers.
It's hard to compare, especially since Journey neglected their European and Eastern markets for many years. I believe most of the other bands did better with their worldwide promotion/touring. It's pretty impressive either way that Journey could play to 25k in Manilla, having never performed a show there before--and a lot of that is due to Arnel. Now, as to how much money was made after the expense of putting the show on, you may be right.
Ironically, most of the rock bands that survived the 90s were the ones that played to Europe and Japan. That way, when your album fails in the US, you still have other markets to recoup money from. Toto was playing 20k seat venues in Europe long after they lost their popularity in the US. Journey shot themselves in the foot by not playing Europe in the 80s.
As far as making money on tours, it's a safe bet to say that Night Ranger doesn't have nearly the pull as Heart or Def Leppard. Truth be told, I don't think they had much influence on ticket sales at all. That said, I do believe this past year was the first year in a long time that Journey has gone out on their own (with basically a supporting act) and played large markets. From a monetary standpoint, Journey may have made as much money on this tour as the others, even though they played to fewer people because of the percentage of gross going to them vs other band.