Moderator: Andrew
Higgy wrote:First off - let me say that I think Tommy Shaw contributed a huge portion of what makes Styx great. I think, without Tommy Shaw, Styx would have been a completely different and less successful band. I also think that JY contributed. However, I think JY contributions were largely negative and I think the band would have been far more successful without him.
Having said that about Tommy, I think what gets me most riled up is that some of you tend to escalate Tommy's contributions to the point of DDY's contributions and, like him or not, thats just not true. In addition to coming up with the direction, concepts, and production of Styx - Dennis is the one who could mold the three very disparate styles together and make one great work (Paradise Theatre comes to mind). Its not just about comparing "Come Sail Away" to "Blue Collar Man" and picking out who had more songwriting talent - its about the general structure, sound, and concept of the band. That was Dennis's role. To say he was a "former keyboardist" or the "guy with a good voice" really doesn't do him justice.
From 1975-1991, he WAS Styx's direction. I'd say those years were pretty important to the band.
Even if you think he's a "showtune guy" or "the guy who kept Tommy from rocking", if you like Styx (even this new bastardization) you have to give him credit for making Styx what it is. This doesn't mean he's the 2nd coming, or he's not a control freak, or he's a better keyboardist than Lawrence Gowan, it means that the band you like so much was his brainchild and you should give him credit for that.
Thenightbull wrote:I'm as big a jy fan as the next guy. Sure he was/is replaceable but no one has the balls to do it not even dennis. You really think he'd go right up to jy's face and say " sorry james but were gonna let you go" i don't think so.
Higgy wrote:First off - let me say that I think Tommy Shaw contributed a huge portion of what makes Styx great. I think, without Tommy Shaw, Styx would have been a completely different and less successful band. I also think that JY contributed. However, I think JY contributions were largely negative and I think the band would have been far more successful without him.
Having said that about Tommy, I think what gets me most riled up is that some of you tend to escalate Tommy's contributions to the point of DDY's contributions and, like him or not, thats just not true. In addition to coming up with the direction, concepts, and production of Styx - Dennis is the one who could mold the three very disparate styles together and make one great work (Paradise Theatre comes to mind). Its not just about comparing "Come Sail Away" to "Blue Collar Man" and picking out who had more songwriting talent - its about the general structure, sound, and concept of the band. That was Dennis's role. To say he was a "former keyboardist" or the "guy with a good voice" really doesn't do him justice.
From 1975-1991, he WAS Styx's direction. I'd say those years were pretty important to the band.
Even if you think he's a "showtune guy" or "the guy who kept Tommy from rocking", if you like Styx (even this new bastardization) you have to give him credit for making Styx what it is. This doesn't mean he's the 2nd coming, or he's not a control freak, or he's a better keyboardist than Lawrence Gowan, it means that the band you like so much was his brainchild and you should give him credit for that.
Saint John wrote:Great fucking post, Higgy. I think Tommy Shaw is incredibly talented, but neither he nor his direction would have made Styx anywhere near as successful as the talents and direction of DDY. Having both of them certainly created a competeitve fire of one trying to "one up" the other, and in the end the fans were treated to some incredible contributions from both of them ... but it also brought about a breaking point. Without Dennis, I doubt Styx will ever have the creativity, fire or brains to ever be relevant again. They need that tension back.[/i]
Higgy wrote:First off - let me say that I think Tommy Shaw contributed a huge portion of what makes Styx great. I think, without Tommy Shaw, Styx would have been a completely different and less successful band. I also think that JY contributed. However, I think JY contributions were largely negative and I think the band would have been far more successful without him.
Having said that about Tommy, I think what gets me most riled up is that some of you tend to escalate Tommy's contributions to the point of DDY's contributions and, like him or not, thats just not true. In addition to coming up with the direction, concepts, and production of Styx - Dennis is the one who could mold the three very disparate styles together and make one great work (Paradise Theatre comes to mind). Its not just about comparing "Come Sail Away" to "Blue Collar Man" and picking out who had more songwriting talent - its about the general structure, sound, and concept of the band. That was Dennis's role. To say he was a "former keyboardist" or the "guy with a good voice" really doesn't do him justice.
From 1975-1991, he WAS Styx's direction. I'd say those years were pretty important to the band.
Even if you think he's a "showtune guy" or "the guy who kept Tommy from rocking", if you like Styx (even this new bastardization) you have to give him credit for making Styx what it is. This doesn't mean he's the 2nd coming, or he's not a control freak, or he's a better keyboardist than Lawrence Gowan, it means that the band you like so much was his brainchild and you should give him credit for that.
Zan wrote:Uh...kinda, the same here! o m g. (with the exception, of course, to the negative remarks about JY's contributions - and to a lesser extent, what Toph said about Tommy playing "good acoustic guitar" because that is just as much a downplay as viewing Dennis DeYoung as nothing but a keyboardist.)
But yeah, for the most part - I agree!
Thenightbull wrote:Toph didn't you listen to cyclorama? Oh wait never mind
I get where youre going. Cyclo could've been paradise theater II if they had marketed and promoted it the way they should have.Toph wrote:Cyclorama had some great moments, but it was still disjointed and lacked cohesion around a common theme and the accompanying tour was just that - a tour. It was what it was, but I wouldn't characterize it as having a real depth of vision.Thenightbull wrote:Toph didn't you listen to cyclorama? Oh wait never mind
Thenightbull wrote:I get where youre going. Cyclo could've been paradise theater II if they had marketed and promoted it the way they should have.Toph wrote:Cyclorama had some great moments, but it was still disjointed and lacked cohesion around a common theme and the accompanying tour was just that - a tour. It was what it was, but I wouldn't characterize it as having a real depth of vision.Thenightbull wrote:Toph didn't you listen to cyclorama? Oh wait never mind
Takes one to know one. Obviously you haven't given cyclo a listen.Higgy wrote:Cyclorama could never have been Paradise Theatre II. You're a fucking idiot.Thenightbull wrote:I get where youre going. Cyclo could've been paradise theater II if they had marketed and promoted it the way they should have.Toph wrote:Cyclorama had some great moments, but it was still disjointed and lacked cohesion around a common theme and the accompanying tour was just that - a tour. It was what it was, but I wouldn't characterize it as having a real depth of vision.Thenightbull wrote:Toph didn't you listen to cyclorama? Oh wait never mind
Thenightbull wrote:Higgy wrote:You're a fucking idiot.
Takes one to know one.
Toph wrote:Cyclorama had some great moments, but it was still disjointed and lacked cohesion around a common theme.
kansas666 wrote:Toph wrote:Cyclorama had some great moments, but it was still disjointed and lacked cohesion around a common theme.
Cyclorama lacked cohesion around a common theme?
Just play it backwards and it says "Dennis is the Devil"
BlackWall wrote:Ehh, no; I don't think you have it to play it backwards for that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests