Hey Styx, take a hint

Paradise Theater

Moderator: Andrew

Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Archetype » Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:07 am

"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing. But it's impossible. Back in the early 80s you could probably do it, but now with YouTube and downloading, the songs would all be out before the album was out. We did Somewhere Back in Time and that dealt with the 80s, and the time before that we did A Matter of Life and Death, just the one album. You can't go out and play the greatest hits every time – it's important to play the newer songs because we really believe in them." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden


Full article

I watched Iron Maiden play to an extremely enthusiastic crowd of 20,000 people last night at the First Niagara Pavilion. Their set list consisted of sixteen songs; ten new songs and six greatest hit/classic songs. The issue isn't necessarily that the fans want to hear old music; they simply want to hear good music. Enough of the Damn Yankees B-side kind of songs like "Difference In The World" Write some good hard rock/progressive songs as a full band. "One With Everything" was a step in the right direction. What happened to that writing mode?
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden
Archetype
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2583
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:06 am
Location: Andromeda

Postby chickenbeef » Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:24 pm

fuck off archetype
chickenbeef
LP
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Boomchild » Fri Jul 16, 2010 4:00 pm

Archetype wrote:
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing. But it's impossible. Back in the early 80s you could probably do it, but now with YouTube and downloading, the songs would all be out before the album was out. We did Somewhere Back in Time and that dealt with the 80s, and the time before that we did A Matter of Life and Death, just the one album. You can't go out and play the greatest hits every time – it's important to play the newer songs because we really believe in them." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden


Full article

I watched Iron Maiden play to an extremely enthusiastic crowd of 20,000 people last night at the First Niagara Pavilion. Their set list consisted of sixteen songs; ten new songs and six greatest hit/classic songs. The issue isn't necessarily that the fans want to hear old music; they simply want to hear good music. Enough of the Damn Yankees B-side kind of songs like "Difference In The World" Write some good hard rock/progressive songs as a full band. "One With Everything" was a step in the right direction. What happened to that writing mode?


Good luck with them taking a hint from something like this. In recent interviews JY seems to have made it clear not to expect a full album of new material from Styx. To him there isn't an outlet for them to do so and I think he seems to feel that is not what the over all fan base wants. Not sure what TS thinks on the subject but he seems to be releasing new solo material. Maybe he does not share JY's opinion on the matter. I think that the so called "lots of new material Styx has written together" will ever see the light of day. What I don't fully understand is why bother working on material that will never be released for your fans to hear.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby chickenbeef » Fri Jul 16, 2010 4:10 pm

Boomchild wrote:
Archetype wrote:
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing. But it's impossible. Back in the early 80s you could probably do it, but now with YouTube and downloading, the songs would all be out before the album was out. We did Somewhere Back in Time and that dealt with the 80s, and the time before that we did A Matter of Life and Death, just the one album. You can't go out and play the greatest hits every time – it's important to play the newer songs because we really believe in them." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden


Full article

I watched Iron Maiden play to an extremely enthusiastic crowd of 20,000 people last night at the First Niagara Pavilion. Their set list consisted of sixteen songs; ten new songs and six greatest hit/classic songs. The issue isn't necessarily that the fans want to hear old music; they simply want to hear good music. Enough of the Damn Yankees B-side kind of songs like "Difference In The World" Write some good hard rock/progressive songs as a full band. "One With Everything" was a step in the right direction. What happened to that writing mode?


Good luck with them taking a hint from something like this. In recent interviews JY seems to have made it clear not to expect a full album of new material from Styx. To him there isn't an outlet for them to do so and I think he seems to feel that is not what the over all fan base wants. Not sure what TS thinks on the subject but he seems to be releasing new solo material. Maybe he does not share JY's opinion on the matter. I think that the so called "lots of new material Styx has written together" will ever see the light of day. What I don't fully understand is why bother working on material that will never be released for your fans to hear.


if anything they should just do it for themselves
chickenbeef
LP
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Babyblue » Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:30 pm

Boomchild wrote:
Archetype wrote:
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing. But it's impossible. Back in the early 80s you could probably do it, but now with YouTube and downloading, the songs would all be out before the album was out. We did Somewhere Back in Time and that dealt with the 80s, and the time before that we did A Matter of Life and Death, just the one album. You can't go out and play the greatest hits every time – it's important to play the newer songs because we really believe in them." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden


Full article

I watched Iron Maiden play to an extremely enthusiastic crowd of 20,000 people last night at the First Niagara Pavilion. Their set list consisted of sixteen songs; ten new songs and six greatest hit/classic songs. The issue isn't necessarily that the fans want to hear old music; they simply want to hear good music. Enough of the Damn Yankees B-side kind of songs like "Difference In The World" Write some good hard rock/progressive songs as a full band. "One With Everything" was a step in the right direction. What happened to that writing mode?


Good luck with them taking a hint from something like this. In recent interviews JY seems to have made it clear not to expect a full album of new material from Styx. To him there isn't an outlet for them to do so and I think he seems to feel that is not what the over all fan base wants. Not sure what TS thinks on the subject but he seems to be releasing new solo material. Maybe he does not share JY's opinion on the matter. I think that the so called "lots of new material Styx has written together" will ever see the light of day. What I don't fully understand is why bother working on material that will never be released for your fans to hear.


Why not Itunes ???Do you think they would do that?????
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.

Postby brywool » Fri Jul 16, 2010 11:18 pm

They should do it simply because another night of playing the same set would have most band's blowing their brains out by their 30th year.

To JY who says there's no outlet, that may be true, unfortunately. People that go to Styx concerts for the most part aren't Itunes savvy enough to create a dent in sales. However- there are a LOT of younger bands out there that are just doing iTunes and releases from their own site. They're not getting rich off of it, but it allows them to get new music to their fanbase. Styx is kind of doing that with the song they just released. I don't know if they're playing that one live or anything, but they did try the "download our song" approach but I don't think it created much of a buzz.

Unfortunately, it looks like Styx has truly just become a nostalgia act. That's such a bummer.
Glad that Journey and Cheap Trick are still making new music.
NO. He's NOT Steve F'ing Perry. But he's Arnel F'ing Pineda and I'm okay with that.
User avatar
brywool
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7688
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 5:54 am

Postby styxfanNH » Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:30 am

brywool wrote:They should do it simply because another night of playing the same set would have most band's blowing their brains out by their 30th year.

To JY who says there's no outlet, that may be true, unfortunately. People that go to Styx concerts for the most part aren't Itunes savvy enough to create a dent in sales. However- there are a LOT of younger bands out there that are just doing iTunes and releases from their own site. They're not getting rich off of it, but it allows them to get new music to their fanbase. Styx is kind of doing that with the song they just released. I don't know if they're playing that one live or anything, but they did try the "download our song" approach but I don't think it created much of a buzz.

Unfortunately, it looks like Styx has truly just become a nostalgia act. That's such a bummer.
Glad that Journey and Cheap Trick are still making new music.


By releasing that song through their web site, they can tell exactly how many times it is downloaded. That tells them the demand for their music because all the die hards are members.

But remember what was talked about in another thread, Even acts like Perry are giving their music away for free. That should tell you the overall demand for new music from veteran artists.
www.styxtoury.com
Concert Dates, articles, and more
styxfanNH
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3022
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 5:39 am
Location: NH

Postby Archetype » Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:46 am

chickenbeef wrote:fuck off archetype


You always add the most intelligent comments! I'm jealous.
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden
Archetype
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2583
Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:06 am
Location: Andromeda

Postby Monker » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:26 am

styxfanNH wrote:
brywool wrote:They should do it simply because another night of playing the same set would have most band's blowing their brains out by their 30th year.

To JY who says there's no outlet, that may be true, unfortunately. People that go to Styx concerts for the most part aren't Itunes savvy enough to create a dent in sales. However- there are a LOT of younger bands out there that are just doing iTunes and releases from their own site. They're not getting rich off of it, but it allows them to get new music to their fanbase. Styx is kind of doing that with the song they just released. I don't know if they're playing that one live or anything, but they did try the "download our song" approach but I don't think it created much of a buzz.

Unfortunately, it looks like Styx has truly just become a nostalgia act. That's such a bummer.
Glad that Journey and Cheap Trick are still making new music.


By releasing that song through their web site, they can tell exactly how many times it is downloaded. That tells them the demand for their music because all the die hards are members.

But remember what was talked about in another thread, Even acts like Perry are giving their music away for free. That should tell you the overall demand for new music from veteran artists.


Perry who? Katy Perry? Steve Perry doesn't have any new music to give away, or an official website to give it away on.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Hollywood » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:29 am

Archetype wrote:
"It's really important if you're going to remain a valid band that you play your new stuff. Otherwise you become a parody of what you started out doing. But it's impossible. Back in the early 80s you could probably do it, but now with YouTube and downloading, the songs would all be out before the album was out. We did Somewhere Back in Time and that dealt with the 80s, and the time before that we did A Matter of Life and Death, just the one album. You can't go out and play the greatest hits every time – it's important to play the newer songs because we really believe in them." - Janick Gers of Iron Maiden


Full article

I watched Iron Maiden play to an extremely enthusiastic crowd of 20,000 people last night at the First Niagara Pavilion. Their set list consisted of sixteen songs; ten new songs and six greatest hit/classic songs. The issue isn't necessarily that the fans want to hear old music; they simply want to hear good music. Enough of the Damn Yankees B-side kind of songs like "Difference In The World" Write some good hard rock/progressive songs as a full band. "One With Everything" was a step in the right direction. What happened to that writing mode?


While this is good in theory for Styx, it unfortunately does not apply. Iron Maiden is a metal band and they have never had a hit. There following is die hard and built on people buying their records and listening to them non-stop. It is really just a different world. Once you cross into the mainstream with Hot 100 hits you draw from the casual fan who only know the hits and only want to hear the hits and there are almost no exceptions to this.

To this day, outside of Headbanger’s Ball there is no place to listen to metal. Prog Rock is the same way, but the luxury is that they can play whatever they want and the fans will dig it. There are bands out there that tour successfully, some on a small scale, some on a larger scale that play different sets every night.

Over the course of a year Styx will play to a far larger audience than Maiden, but it require them to play the hits and be on the road 10 of 12 months.

To me I would prefer them to play random sets with the key hits songs every night and they need to play longer sets when they are by themselves. 90 minutes just doesn’t cut it. An evening with Styx should mean a 2-hour set. This would give them more time to delve deeper into their catalog.

Additionally, the newer tracks are similar to Shaw/Blades, not Damn Yankees. Damn Yankees were a rock band. Although I would prefer Styx not play High Enough at all, it was much better with Glen singing the second part. This is not a slam on Gowan, but his voice does not fit the song. Neither would Dennis’.
"We Were Born To Be Loved'"
Hollywood
LP
 
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2008 11:39 am
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Monker » Sat Jul 17, 2010 7:37 am

Boomchild wrote: In recent interviews JY seems to have made it clear not to expect a full album of new material from Styx.


That's not exactly true. In the last JY interview, he said the market concentrates on singles. So, they release a single here and there and eventually have enough out there for a full album. So, they could release an album of "Just Be", "Everything All the Time", "I Am the Walrun", the two Christmas songs from the CYO album, the new song on their website, and a few other new ones.

To him there isn't an outlet for them to do so and I think he seems to feel that is not what the over all fan base wants.


I disagree with this too. Of course he knows the 'fanbase' wants new music...that should be a given. He, and I'm sure the rest of the band, knows that it it is probably not worth the time to take off touring to sit down and do an entire album worth of writing and recording together to release a full album...all of that costs money, and leaving touring also eliminates income...so it doesn't make sense to do that and release an album that won't sell enough to make up for the investment So, they do a new song here and there. From what Ricky said, they have done a lot of writing on the road, but have not taken it to the studio...this is probably why.

Not sure what TS thinks on the subject but he seems to be releasing new solo material. Maybe he does not share JY's opinion on the matter. I think that the so called "lots of new material Styx has written together" will ever see the light of day. What I don't fully understand is why bother working on material that will never be released for your fans to hear.


Because they are musicians and songwriters. I bet half the songs written by a band like Styx never make it to an album.
Monker
MP3
 
Posts: 12648
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2002 12:40 pm

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Boomchild » Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:40 pm

Monker wrote:
Boomchild wrote: In recent interviews JY seems to have made it clear not to expect a full album of new material from Styx.


That's not exactly true. In the last JY interview, he said the market concentrates on singles. So, they release a single here and there and eventually have enough out there for a full album. So, they could release an album of "Just Be", "Everything All the Time", "I Am the Walrun", the two Christmas songs from the CYO album, the new song on their website, and a few other new ones.

To him there isn't an outlet for them to do so and I think he seems to feel that is not what the over all fan base wants.


I disagree with this too. Of course he knows the 'fanbase' wants new music...that should be a given. He, and I'm sure the rest of the band, knows that it it is probably not worth the time to take off touring to sit down and do an entire album worth of writing and recording together to release a full album...all of that costs money, and leaving touring also eliminates income...so it doesn't make sense to do that and release an album that won't sell enough to make up for the investment So, they do a new song here and there. From what Ricky said, they have done a lot of writing on the road, but have not taken it to the studio...this is probably why.

Not sure what TS thinks on the subject but he seems to be releasing new solo material. Maybe he does not share JY's opinion on the matter. I think that the so called "lots of new material Styx has written together" will ever see the light of day. What I don't fully understand is why bother working on material that will never be released for your fans to hear.


Because they are musicians and songwriters. I bet half the songs written by a band like Styx never make it to an album.


All I can say is, I wouldn't hold my breath for a new album from Styx. They just are not going to release anything substantial because theres no money in it.
User avatar
Boomchild
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 7129
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 6:10 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Postby Andrew » Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:46 pm

chickenbeef wrote:fuck off archetype


How about you go first?
User avatar
Andrew
Administrator
 
Posts: 10961
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2002 9:12 pm
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Postby chickenbeef » Sat Jul 17, 2010 6:25 pm

Andrew wrote:
chickenbeef wrote:fuck off archetype


How about you go first?


no thanks
chickenbeef
LP
 
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:59 am

Re: Hey Styx, take a hint

Postby Babyblue » Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:20 am

[quote="Monker

Because they are musicians and songwriters. I bet half the songs written by a band like Styx never make it to an album.[/quote]

And i bet that is so ture. :cry:
Styx & Gowan fan forever
Keep On Rocking Guys:)

I will never stop believeing in you SP.:)
Babyblue
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 8023
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:04 pm
Location: Grits girls raised in the south.


Return to Styx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests