[GEEK ON]
YoungJRNY wrote:Still has nothing to do with Batman not being a super hero!
So you're right and umpteen thousands of
Batfans are wrong? Guess again, buddy. There are always going to be more
Bat-titles and
Bat-stories. DC had to tap John Byrne to reboot Supes in
The Man Of Steel because that was one old tire that had run out of tread. Batman will never have that problem. Tweaking him only makes him better and more interesting.
YoungJRNY wrote:verslibre wrote:Huh? What? English, please.
DC is mostly built around the ability of hero's who are Gods. Marvel's God's are nothing but cheap knockoffs and a compliment of DC characters. Marvel has a more human element going for their readers to fetch on, so if anything, Batman would fit more into the Marvel mold than he would DC as an overall concept.
As a former DC snob who got sick of Marvel's mutant fodder over 20 years ago, I tend not to dump on Marvel because technically they're two decades behind DC in terms of serious output. Everything "Marvel" today that's hot got revving in the '60s, whereas DC was publishing the comics of its primary characters throughout the '40s and '50s.
Trust me, Batman wouldn't fit into the Marvel Universe.
YoungJRNY wrote:Well, yeah. That's the entire point of being a kid and picking a comic book off the shelves. If Batman is any indication, just walk outside. Super Heros were created for the element of being boom-flashy-flashy and shit like that.

But I brought up the notion of the plausible superhero. Superman is not one.
YoungJRNY wrote:verslibre wrote:Uh, no, that is technically a weakness. He can die if he doesn't keep it "current" — pun intended!
Not my point. The point is, is that Stark is actually faced with a cool dilemma and story of having a need for a battery to keep his heart beating for a chance at life. A 'real' dilema. Batman's parents died. Yawn.
Stark's story is simply reflective of the time. He was wounded in Viet Nam (Afghanistan in the comic reboot, which was used for the movie). I think being a child and having your parents murdered in front of you was a traumatic enough origin for the 1930s.
YoungJRNY wrote:Krypton is a deceased planet, so that all goes out the window.
A flesh-and-blood being is a flesh-and-blood being. That was my point.
YoungJRNY wrote:Superman has already been battered and bruised under the influence of his weakness's. Too bad givin' a lifetime of Yellow-Sun radiation, it would take a monumental amount of Kryptonite from puny-human Lex Luthor or Batman to actually hurt Superman to begin with.
A hurt Clark Kent is still 1 million times powerful than Bruce Wayne. No contest.

Nope. But I've read so many different interpretations of the effects of kryptonite, it's not been nailed down.
John Byrne had Supes open a cannister with kryptonite and point it at a Kryptonian criminal. The guy recoiled in abject terror at just a small rock.
Alan Moore wrote Supes' exposure to kryptonite poisoning as having similar effects to metastasized cancer. That was a very cool story, though I haven't read it since the '80s.
They've shown him get hit with a krypto-laser and it was like a human being hit by a bullet.
In the original
Superman with Christopher Reeve, there was the chain with a hunk of kryptonite. He couldn't even get the blasted thing off him without Miss Teschmacher's help.
Then in
Superman Returns, he's nearly done in with a kryptonite shank (after not being smart enough to FLY AWAY FROM A GIANT MOUNTAIN OF KRYPTONITE). But that's also the movie that's been shitted out of canon, because, as even Peter David said, Supes would never interrupt his role as supercop for an interstellar vacation. I still can't believe they greenlit that dogshit.
YoungJRNY wrote:The "God-like" powers like moving planets came as the character evolved over time.
Dude, he was doing that shit in the '40s and '50s. That's nothing recent.
YoungJRNY wrote:Dude, you didn't even know "Kal-L" was a retcon!
Uh, yeah I did, haha. Just pointed out the entire point of the retcon. Anyway, back to religion. Turning my nerd off in this thread since we hi-jacked it. Nice goin', RIP!

And the funny thing is I like Batman. Always fun to see Bat-fans get their panties (no pun intended) in a wad when you call him out for not being a superhero.

Works everytime.
Hardly. I'm just showing you that your preference is clearly for the Superman of half a century ago, the guy who juggles moons like shuttlecocks and uses Saturn's rings as hula-hoops. I rest my case in that interesting characters are defined by their limitations and shortcomings, not by being able to fart with enough pressure to reverse the Milky Way's spiral. You know, ridiculous "God"-like stuff like that.
The Dark Knight Rises is gonna kick so much ass!! BANE, baby!!!
[GEEK OFF]
