
Moderator: Andrew
"The director confirmed that Superman will be in Gotham during the movie, and that his interactions with the various heroes in the film will serve to change the way he looks at the world, just as he's accepting his own destiny after Man of Steel."
JBlake wrote:I thought Batman and Superman were both "good guys" back in the day. So why are they now being pitted against one another as one being "good" and one being "bad"?
YoungJRNY wrote:JBlake wrote:I thought Batman and Superman were both "good guys" back in the day. So why are they now being pitted against one another as one being "good" and one being "bad"?
Neither Superman nor Batman are the bad guys. But their motives as heroes remain unclear right now since the events in MoS changed everything, even the lives of others in hiding. Batman will be the early antagonist in all of this and will question alien lifeforms on Earth but it's all leading towards partnership and a respected alliance. Even when Superman and Batman are on the same page, they still have different theories and ways of agreeing on how to go about things. They really have a dynamic relationship. It's going to be fucking wild to see it on the bigscreen.
verslibre wrote:Sounds like you're in the dark, JB!
Rip Rokken wrote:Looks like Gotham City in the background.
JBlake wrote:Is it going to be shown in 3D?
YoungJRNY wrote:JBlake wrote:I thought Batman and Superman were both "good guys" back in the day. So why are they now being pitted against one another as one being "good" and one being "bad"?
Neither Superman nor Batman are the bad guys. But their motives as heroes remain unclear right now since the events in MoS changed everything, even the lives of others in hiding. Batman will be the early antagonist in all of this and will question alien lifeforms on Earth but it's all leading towards partnership and a respected alliance. Even when Superman and Batman are on the same page, they still have different theories and ways of agreeing on how to go about things. They really have a dynamic relationship. It's going to be fucking wild to see it on the bigscreen.
verslibre wrote:RedWingFan wrote:You should be ashamed of yourself for mentioning that movie in the same sentence as the Avengers.
Puhleez. The FX in Avengers weren't entirely perfect, especially where/when the Hulk (who is all-CGI) was in shots with human actors.
No "sense of gravity or weight"? That's funny.
Monker wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:JBlake wrote:I thought Batman and Superman were both "good guys" back in the day. So why are they now being pitted against one another as one being "good" and one being "bad"?
Neither Superman nor Batman are the bad guys. But their motives as heroes remain unclear right now since the events in MoS changed everything, even the lives of others in hiding. Batman will be the early antagonist in all of this and will question alien lifeforms on Earth but it's all leading towards partnership and a respected alliance. Even when Superman and Batman are on the same page, they still have different theories and ways of agreeing on how to go about things. They really have a dynamic relationship. It's going to be fucking wild to see it on the bigscreen.
If you have to take this much effort to explain it, it's not going to go over well with the average person.
The director can't say exactly how the relationship between the two superheroes evolves, "but suffice it to say there is a 'v' in between their names" in the movie title, Snyder says. He explains that having the "v" instead of "vs." is a way "to keep it from being a straight 'versus' movie, even in the most subtle way.It wasn't just too go in a different direction because everyone was already calling the movie "Batman Vs. Superman," but the "v" has more meaning."
verslibre wrote:Dude is ripped.
Seven Wishes wrote:"Abysmal? He's the most proactive President since Clinton, and he's bringing much-needed change for the better to a nation that has been tyrannized by the worst President since Hoover."- 7 Wishes on Pres. Obama
A source of Movieweb's claims that WB commissioned Kevin Smith to write a fake script based on the first treatment of BvS, and that every scoop we'vs gotten in the last 6 months have been from that script, which is filled with inaccuracies and huge red herrings.
So, in other words, we know **** all about this movie, and its all Kevin Smith's fault
YoungJRNY wrote:A source of Movieweb's claims that WB commissioned Kevin Smith to write a fake script based on the first treatment of BvS, and that every scoop we'vs gotten in the last 6 months have been from that script, which is filled with inaccuracies and huge red herrings.
So, in other words, we know **** all about this movie, and its all Kevin Smith's fault
LOL, awesome. We don't know SHIT.
verslibre wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:A source of Movieweb's claims that WB commissioned Kevin Smith to write a fake script based on the first treatment of BvS, and that every scoop we'vs gotten in the last 6 months have been from that script, which is filled with inaccuracies and huge red herrings.
So, in other words, we know **** all about this movie, and its all Kevin Smith's fault
LOL, awesome. We don't know SHIT.
HAHA!! Badass!!
YoungJRNY wrote:
LAWLS!
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Seems you can't enjoy MOS on it's own terms w/out putting Singer's fine film down.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:The SR outfit was retro.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:But everything about the very idea of Superman is retro and boyscoutish.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:He predated the antiheroism of Wolverine, Punisher, and Batman.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Captain America suffers from the same thing. Is this truly any worse?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:
LAWLS!
Seems you can't enjoy MOS on it's own terms w/out putting Singer's fine film down. Makes me question just how much you actually enjoy MOS.
The SR outfit was retro.
YoungJRNY wrote:I agree with v, btw. With Cyclops Returns, I was rooting for Richard White more than I was Supes and in a SUPERMAN film, that's a huge no-no. Richard White was more heroic than Supes ever was in CR and it made Superman look nothing more than a deadbeat, home-wrecking snatch. SR truly was an awful representation of an already established world of Superman from 1978. Singer turned a classic into a cheap mockery.
verslibre wrote:
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests