Moderator: Andrew
yogi wrote:Rush didnt and beat Cheap Trick to the hall. Pink Floyd didnt change their direction.
Dream Theater came around in 1985. Their last two albums produced Grammy nominations. Their last three albums all entered Billboard in the top 10. I cant wait for their new double album, the rock opera "'The Astonishing' to come out Jan 29. I wonder the last time a double album debuted in the top 10? Dream Theater has been around for 30 years and has never sold out. Progressive Rock or Progressive Metal for 30 years and they are more popular than ever.
Im not saying Styx sold out, but damn Equinox, The Grand Illusion, and Pieces of Eight were to me by FAAAARRRRRR their best work.
yogi wrote:Rush didnt and beat Cheap Trick to the hall. Pink Floyd didnt change their direction.
Dream Theater came around in 1985. Their last two albums produced Grammy nominations. Their last three albums all entered Billboard in the top 10. I cant wait for their new double album, the rock opera "'The Astonishing' to come out Jan 29. I wonder the last time a double album debuted in the top 10? Dream Theater has been around for 30 years and has never sold out. Progressive Rock or Progressive Metal for 30 years and they are more popular than ever.
Im not saying Styx sold out, but damn Equinox, The Grand Illusion, and Pieces of Eight were to me by FAAAARRRRRR their best work.
yogi wrote:Rush and Styx were pretty damn close back when Styx was doing Equinox, The Grand Illusion & Pieces Of Eight. They were categorized the same. The critics HATED Rush as they did Styx. Totally disliked progressive music. Styx was progressive, maybe not quite as much as Rush but progressive nonetheless.
Rush stayed true to their progressive roots as did Pink Floyd. Styx pretty much completely changed.
Dream Theater has had one hit but stayed 100% true to their progressive metal(rock) roots and they are now 30 years in selling millions of albums at a time when album sales have died off.
Styx started off and remained very close to the above groups in terms of genre until Cornerstone.
Don't get me wrong I really liked Cornerstone and I loved Paradise Theater. Shit, Dream Theater's upcoming The Astonishing double concept album sounds like it has a major Kilroy type of theme. But with all that being said for me Equinox, The Grand Illusion and Pieces Of Eight were far and away Styx at their creative best. Their music was more complex, creative and far better on those albums.
I do wonder if Styx would have stayed true to those roots with their solid vocals and the creativity those albums (Equinox, The Grand Illusion & Pieces Of Eight) displayed if Styx now would be thought in a far more respected light with Dennis still in the group and Styx in the Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame.
We will never know.
Toph- You get a chance you ought to YouTube Dream Theaters only hit Pull Me Under, plus their last two Grammy nominated songs On The Backs Of Angles and The Enemy Inside. The Videos are awesome and their music is far and away better that anyones.
Toph wrote:Monker's posts once again prove how big of an idiot he is. Here are the facts:
Thank goodness DDY saw the coming trends and made a tweak in Styx's direction.
Too bad that Tommy and JY couldn't adapt.
Its called evolving. Journey did it.
Even new RnR HOF inductees Cheap Trick evolved. After all, they gave us "The Flame," their only #1 single. Hardly a Cheap Trick song in the likeness of Surrender or I Want You To Want Me...
This constant bashing of Babe and that "it ruined the band" is so misguided and so devoid of facts.
scarab wrote:Toph wrote:Monker's posts once again prove how big of an idiot he is. Here are the facts:
Thank goodness DDY saw the coming trends and made a tweak in Styx's direction. Too bad that Tommy and JY couldn't adapt. Because beyond one new-wave themed song from Tommy Shaw in 1981, every major Styx contribution after 1978 begins and ends with DDY. He saw a trend and adjusted to the trend - its called being smart. Its called evolving. Journey did it. Foreigner did it. REO Speedwagon did it. They ALL did it. DDY was on the leading edge of the trend and those others followed. You know who didn't? Kansas. And guess what happened to Kansas? They disappeared when the decade ended and are known today for a grand total of 2 albums. They didn't evolve.
Actually as you can tell by my avatar, i am a huge fan of all Kansas's albums. They did evolve. They went from semi progressive, and even mor songs to almost straight up rock, to almost AOR on the elephante albums (save a couple of Livgren songs).
They then had there biggest hit in 1986 in ages with a Survivorish song (all i wanted) . That album was pretty much straight up rock again. I loved it but I am a huge AOR fan. The Power songs did not go over with the prog fans, all i wanted was actually booed.
masque wrote:#2) Everyone keeps slamming Tommy's comment about wanting to rock instead of doing ballads and they continuously point out songs like Boat, She Cares, Sing for the Day and things like that.....I dont know how many of you are musicians and have ever played live before, but if you have then you will understand how truly different it FEELS to sing and play a song like Sing for the Day VS, a song like Babe or First Time. A song sing fro the day is a fun song to play and because of the non 4/4 time signature is an interesting thing to do.......however, songs like Babe and First Time are songs that truly do enter into the Barry Manalow/Air Supply territory and as a musician the only thing I would ever enjoy about playing those songs live would be the money entering into my bank account. I think Tommy was scared to death after the success of Babe that First Time would become their second Air Supply major hit and then all of a sudden those types of songs would become the centerpiece of what they would be known for and the centerpiece of their live performances instead of songs like Renegade, BCM and Come Sail Away. I have never understood why people dont understand this.....and the only thing I can figure is that many who dont recognize the difference have spent no or very little time on a stage playing live music.
Boomchild wrote:masque wrote:#2) Everyone keeps slamming Tommy's comment about wanting to rock instead of doing ballads and they continuously point out songs like Boat, She Cares, Sing for the Day and things like that.....I dont know how many of you are musicians and have ever played live before, but if you have then you will understand how truly different it FEELS to sing and play a song like Sing for the Day VS, a song like Babe or First Time. A song sing fro the day is a fun song to play and because of the non 4/4 time signature is an interesting thing to do.......however, songs like Babe and First Time are songs that truly do enter into the Barry Manalow/Air Supply territory and as a musician the only thing I would ever enjoy about playing those songs live would be the money entering into my bank account. I think Tommy was scared to death after the success of Babe that First Time would become their second Air Supply major hit and then all of a sudden those types of songs would become the centerpiece of what they would be known for and the centerpiece of their live performances instead of songs like Renegade, BCM and Come Sail Away. I have never understood why people dont understand this.....and the only thing I can figure is that many who dont recognize the difference have spent no or very little time on a stage playing live music.
As to what type of song is fun or not fun to play is based on personal taste. It's seems to me you are painting with broad brush with this example. I highly doubt this apples to all musicians that play live. It doesn't take into account the personal feelings a musician may have about the material being played.
masque wrote:Boomchild wrote:masque wrote:#2) Everyone keeps slamming Tommy's comment about wanting to rock instead of doing ballads and they continuously point out songs like Boat, She Cares, Sing for the Day and things like that.....I dont know how many of you are musicians and have ever played live before, but if you have then you will understand how truly different it FEELS to sing and play a song like Sing for the Day VS, a song like Babe or First Time. A song sing fro the day is a fun song to play and because of the non 4/4 time signature is an interesting thing to do.......however, songs like Babe and First Time are songs that truly do enter into the Barry Manalow/Air Supply territory and as a musician the only thing I would ever enjoy about playing those songs live would be the money entering into my bank account. I think Tommy was scared to death after the success of Babe that First Time would become their second Air Supply major hit and then all of a sudden those types of songs would become the centerpiece of what they would be known for and the centerpiece of their live performances instead of songs like Renegade, BCM and Come Sail Away. I have never understood why people dont understand this.....and the only thing I can figure is that many who dont recognize the difference have spent no or very little time on a stage playing live music.
As to what type of song is fun or not fun to play is based on personal taste. It's seems to me you are painting with broad brush with this example. I highly doubt this apples to all musicians that play live. It doesn't take into account the personal feelings a musician may have about the material being played.
it is a broad brush.....but I can virtually guarantee you that for 95% of guitarists playing a song like Babe or First Time and NOT being the writer of the song would be very very boring, especially when you consider the other much more interesting songs they could play live in place of those mentioned. regardless of how broad the brush is, does not make it less true.
dont mistake that what I am saying means that Babe or First Time are bad songs......they are both well written.....but I dont know ANY guitarists that would EVER pick to play those songs over nearly anything else in their catalog.
Monker wrote:Toph wrote:Monker's posts once again prove how big of an idiot he is. Here are the facts:
Thank goodness DDY saw the coming trends and made a tweak in Styx's direction.
LOL...too funny. You are too much.
Styx started doing progressive towards the END of that craze.
Then he spotted disco coming and completely missed taking advantage of that.
He then spotted album oriented rock from a long way away when he started emphasizing Styx' singles.
Then he hired Glen and, according to YOU, tried to go all glam - AFTER THE GLAM TREND ENDED!
Yeah, he really tweaked the band in the direction of coming trends. What a ridiculous statement.
He made ONE love ballad. Those type of songs are ALWAYS going in and out of pop music. When did Kiss release Beth?
Then this guy who people think somehow changes styles on a whim REPEATS THE SAME STYLE ON EVERY STYX ALBUM THAT FOLLOWS, EVEN BNW.Too bad that Tommy and JY couldn't adapt.
They didn't have to. They had to fire Dennis to get Styx back on track to being a rock band.Its called evolving. Journey did it.
Journey also had members entering and leaving with almost every album. Beyond that, until recently, they made an effort to not constantly repeat their sound from the previous albums. Journey never had a #1 single to get caught in this trap of having to repeat that level of success. They were an album band, as were all of the others you mention. Dennis turned Styx into a singles band , constantly chasing the singles charts. You and your endless pointing to meaningless chart success is proof of that.Even new RnR HOF inductees Cheap Trick evolved. After all, they gave us "The Flame," their only #1 single. Hardly a Cheap Trick song in the likeness of Surrender or I Want You To Want Me...
The ROR:HOF is so political that the music has little to anything to do with it any longer. "Cheap Trick" shouldn't even be there anyway.This constant bashing of Babe and that "it ruined the band" is so misguided and so devoid of facts.
That is not even the point I was making. You are making shit up.
"Babe" in itself didn't "ruin the band". Dennis constantly chasing to find singles to duplicate that success and showiving them down the throat of the rest of the band is what I said killed the band.
You sit there on your ass and type made up bullshit and make it sound like Dennis is so creative an innovative but he really hasn't changed much about the music he creates in about 40yrs...more than half his life ago. Even OYFN is throwback to Styx music. You can make fun of Tommy's blugrass album - but at least it is something different from Styx. Even 7DZ was a lot different than anything Tommy had done prior. Even Cyclorama was a more modern twist on the Styx sound...without a complete throwback, as Journey did on Revelation.
Cassie May wrote:You are all forgetting that the main reason DDY made Styx change their sound was due to his reading an article in England during the band's tour there for Po8 that prog was on its way out. This from a country that was overtaken by the Sex Pistols and punk music. Because of what DDY read in England, he changed the sound of an American rock band. I guess we should be grateful he didn't make Styx go punk.
Boomchild wrote:masque wrote:#2) Everyone keeps slamming Tommy's comment about wanting to rock instead of doing ballads and they continuously point out songs like Boat, She Cares, Sing for the Day and things like that.....I dont know how many of you are musicians and have ever played live before, but if you have then you will understand how truly different it FEELS to sing and play a song like Sing for the Day VS, a song like Babe or First Time. A song sing fro the day is a fun song to play and because of the non 4/4 time signature is an interesting thing to do.......however, songs like Babe and First Time are songs that truly do enter into the Barry Manalow/Air Supply territory and as a musician the only thing I would ever enjoy about playing those songs live would be the money entering into my bank account. I think Tommy was scared to death after the success of Babe that First Time would become their second Air Supply major hit and then all of a sudden those types of songs would become the centerpiece of what they would be known for and the centerpiece of their live performances instead of songs like Renegade, BCM and Come Sail Away. I have never understood why people dont understand this.....and the only thing I can figure is that many who dont recognize the difference have spent no or very little time on a stage playing live music.
As to what type of song is fun or not fun to play is based on personal taste. It's seems to me you are painting with broad brush with this example. I highly doubt this apples to all musicians that play live. It doesn't take into account the personal feelings a musician may have about the material being played.
Toph wrote:You never addressed my point re: Journey. Because you are such a fanboy of that band, you are ok that they went the ballad route and Styx didn't. That makes total illogical sense - which of course is par for the course for you Monkhead.
And you clearly don't know much about Journey. Between 1977 and 1996
Toph wrote:Again, I would also point out that Mick Jones, Neil Schon, and Gary Richrath certainly played those songs as well. I still cannot understand why Styx gets slammed for ballads but Foreigner, Journey, and REO get a pass.
Baron Von Bielski wrote:Anyways, I feel Damn Yankees could garner enough attendance as part of a triple bill just like is required for Styx and Night Ranger to effectively tour. As long as it's not hunting season, I think it's the right time for a reunion tour. It'd work easily packaged with bands like Def Leppard for one and or Tesla for another. I'd go see it.
Monker wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:Anyways, I feel Damn Yankees could garner enough attendance as part of a triple bill just like is required for Styx and Night Ranger to effectively tour. As long as it's not hunting season, I think it's the right time for a reunion tour. It'd work easily packaged with bands like Def Leppard for one and or Tesla for another. I'd go see it.
As long as it's not with Firehouse, Poison, or that band with the chainsaw....I agree.
Way back when, I kinda wished they toured with Bad English. Journey, DY, and John Waite wouldn't be bad either.
Baron Von Bielski wrote:Anyways, I feel Damn Yankees could garner enough attendance as part of a triple bill just like is required for Styx and Night Ranger to effectively tour. As long as it's not hunting season, I think it's the right time for a reunion tour. It'd work easily packaged with bands like Def Leppard for one and or Tesla for another. I'd go see it.
Baron Von Bielski wrote:Monker wrote:Baron Von Bielski wrote:Anyways, I feel Damn Yankees could garner enough attendance as part of a triple bill just like is required for Styx and Night Ranger to effectively tour. As long as it's not hunting season, I think it's the right time for a reunion tour. It'd work easily packaged with bands like Def Leppard for one and or Tesla for another. I'd go see it.
As long as it's not with Firehouse, Poison, or that band with the chainsaw....I agree.
Way back when, I kinda wished they toured with Bad English. Journey, DY, and John Waite wouldn't be bad either.
Yeah, no way could I see Ted playing on a bill with the likes of Poison. Touring with Journey would work well, totally agree.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests