Moderator: Andrew
scarab wrote:Or pick a local up and coming rock band and give them a shot in each city. Didnt Bon Jovi do that?
scarab wrote:maybe Air Supply could be the opening act.
JourneyHard wrote:Instead of Chicago, why doesn't Journey tour with Boston?
Monker wrote: And, Journey seems more interested in touring with harder rock bands than nostalgic pop bands.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote: And, Journey seems more interested in touring with harder rock bands than nostalgic pop bands.
Tower of Power and Doobie Bros are harder rock bands? Imho, Journey will tour with whoever Azoff lines them up with.
Art Vandelay wrote:
The Doobies I get. They had balls before Michael McDonald showed up on the scene, and Tommy Johnston is still a favorite to see for the old fans. TOP...not so much. Although I've seen them before and they are a solid band and I do love a lot of their stuff, just not a great act for Journey in my opinion.
Chicago - definitely not. The comparison that Jason gave of them touring with Earth, Wind and Fire doesn't apply with Journey. EWF and Chicago shared a common thread – a solid horn section. Maybe they should reach out to TOP instead!
Had times and circumstances been different, and Terry Kath were still alive and Danny Ceraphine were still with Chicago, maybe that could have worked with Journey. They were the soul of that band. But the current version of Chicago...I just don't see it.
tj wrote:I would be surprised if Neal would go for it because I doubt that he wants Journey to be known as a "power ballad band".
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:
The Doobies I get. They had balls before Michael McDonald showed up on the scene, and Tommy Johnston is still a favorite to see for the old fans. TOP...not so much. Although I've seen them before and they are a solid band and I do love a lot of their stuff, just not a great act for Journey in my opinion.
Chicago - definitely not. The comparison that Jason gave of them touring with Earth, Wind and Fire doesn't apply with Journey. EWF and Chicago shared a common thread – a solid horn section. Maybe they should reach out to TOP instead!
Had times and circumstances been different, and Terry Kath were still alive and Danny Ceraphine were still with Chicago, maybe that could have worked with Journey. They were the soul of that band. But the current version of Chicago...I just don't see it.
Of all the groups Journey toured with in the US (Foreigner, REO, Styx, Def Leppard, Steve Miller, etc), Leppard would probably be the hardest, which is still pretty soft. Overseas, they have tried to tour with some harder acts.
Eric wrote:tj wrote:I would be surprised if Neal would go for it because I doubt that he wants Journey to be known as a "power ballad band".
Promoting and emphasizing the power ballads would make a Journey/Chicago tour work, but that isn't the direction either band wants to mostly be known for. They do share in common a very deep history with different lead singers, but unfortunately known narrowly by the masses for a relatively few number of early-mid 80's hits. Both also are seasoned vets who put on tremendous live shows.
tj wrote:Eric wrote:tj wrote:I would be surprised if Neal would go for it because I doubt that he wants Journey to be known as a "power ballad band".
Promoting and emphasizing the power ballads would make a Journey/Chicago tour work, but that isn't the direction either band wants to mostly be known for. They do share in common a very deep history with different lead singers, but unfortunately known narrowly by the masses for a relatively few number of early-mid 80's hits. Both also are seasoned vets who put on tremendous live shows.
That is the challenge. The masses know Chicago particularly for the ballads. Even at the HOF introduction for them, Rob Thomas I think it was, said that they were known to a lot of people as your mother's music - but if they were your mother's music, he wanted to date your mother (or something like that) in reference to their deeper catalog.
I think people who go for the ballads would be surprised and have a great time with both bands' music.
Art Vandelay wrote: Unfortunately, a lot of their heavier, deeper catalog was due to Terry Kath. He was a real mofo on the guitar, and was even told so by Hendrix. Once Kath passed, the band lost a lot of their soul and grit.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote: And, Journey seems more interested in touring with harder rock bands than nostalgic pop bands.
Tower of Power and Doobie Bros are harder rock bands? Imho, Journey will tour with whoever Azoff lines them up with.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Art Vandelay wrote:
The Doobies I get. They had balls before Michael McDonald showed up on the scene, and Tommy Johnston is still a favorite to see for the old fans. TOP...not so much. Although I've seen them before and they are a solid band and I do love a lot of their stuff, just not a great act for Journey in my opinion.
Chicago - definitely not. The comparison that Jason gave of them touring with Earth, Wind and Fire doesn't apply with Journey. EWF and Chicago shared a common thread – a solid horn section. Maybe they should reach out to TOP instead!
Had times and circumstances been different, and Terry Kath were still alive and Danny Ceraphine were still with Chicago, maybe that could have worked with Journey. They were the soul of that band. But the current version of Chicago...I just don't see it.
Of all the groups Journey toured with in the US (Foreigner, REO, Styx, Def Leppard, Steve Miller, etc), Leppard would probably be the hardest, which is still pretty soft. Overseas, they have tried to tour with some harder acts.
Art Vandelay wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote: And, Journey seems more interested in touring with harder rock bands than nostalgic pop bands.
Tower of Power and Doobie Bros are harder rock bands? Imho, Journey will tour with whoever Azoff lines them up with.
The Doobies I get. They had balls before Michael McDonald showed up on the scene, and Tommy Johnston is still a favorite to see for the old fans. TOP...not so much. Although I've seen them before and they are a solid band and I do love a lot of their stuff, just not a great act for Journey in my opinion.
Chicago - definitely not. The comparison that Jason gave of them touring with Earth, Wind and Fire doesn't apply with Journey. EWF and Chicago shared a common thread – a solid horn section. Maybe they should reach out to TOP instead!
Had times and circumstances been different, and Terry Kath were still alive and Danny Ceraphine were still with Chicago, maybe that could have worked with Journey. They were the soul of that band. But the current version of Chicago...I just don't see it.
Monker wrote:'And, all of those are harder rock than Chicago.
Eric wrote:Art Vandelay wrote: Unfortunately, a lot of their heavier, deeper catalog was due to Terry Kath. He was a real mofo on the guitar, and was even told so by Hendrix. Once Kath passed, the band lost a lot of their soul and grit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEqRTZcisos
Monker wrote:But, back around the Arrival days, Chicago would have been a great choice for an opening band....just not now.
Monker wrote:
'And, all of those are harder rock than Chicago.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Monker wrote:'And, all of those are harder rock than Chicago.
When you're already touring with Tower of Power, you may as well tour with Earth Wind & Fire or Chicago. Makes absolutely ZERO difference. It's like saying Billy Joel is more "harder rock" than Elton John. Neither rock and it's a distinction without difference.
DracIsBack wrote:Monker wrote:
'And, all of those are harder rock than Chicago.
REO Speedwagon is 'harder rock' than Chicago?
DracIsBack wrote:Monker wrote:But, back around the Arrival days, Chicago would have been a great choice for an opening band....just not now.
Yeah - Chicago would *NEVER* have been an opening act for journey. Their egos wouldn't have allowed it.
Reality is also - if Journey has "the dirty dozen", Chicago has the dirty "three dozen". Both bands can still go out and play to venues with thousands on their own, and 10,000 or more when paired with a similar band.
tj wrote:DracIsBack wrote:Monker wrote:But, back around the Arrival days, Chicago would have been a great choice for an opening band....just not now.
Yeah - Chicago would *NEVER* have been an opening act for journey. Their egos wouldn't have allowed it.
Reality is also - if Journey has "the dirty dozen", Chicago has the dirty "three dozen". Both bands can still go out and play to venues with thousands on their own, and 10,000 or more when paired with a similar band.
Chicago's challenge is that at almost 70 years of age, the 4 remaining original members have difficulty with stamina over a long show. The horn players frequently have substitutes playing for them at shows. Bobby Lamm is the only original member who is always on the road. But no one notices, or maybe cares, that it isn't the original horn players. They spread the lead vocals around Lamm, Scheff, Keith Howland (guitar) and Lou Pardini (keyboards). This takes the stress off any one singer.
They played with REO, Doobies, EWF and someone else (I can't remember who right now) over the past few years. Both bands would play on a couple of each others' songs. In one video, Kevin Cronin of REO appears to be reading lyrics to a Chicago song from a piece of paper in his hand. Sort of funny.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests