They're Eating The Dogs Presidential Thread

[Boomchild]

Microsoft founder Bill Gates has warned that Africa’s population explosion will overwhelm Europe unless the continent makes it more difficult for migrants to reach its shores.

In an interview with the German Welt am Sonntag newspaper, Gates said massive population growth in Africa will result in “enormous [migratory] pressure” on Europe unless countries increase overseas development aid payments.

Praising Germany having achieved its commitment to devote 0.7 per cent of GDP to foreign aid as “phenomenal”, the 61-year-old called on “other European nations to follow its example”.

But Gates also spoke of a dilemma caused by ‘the German attitude to refugees’, referring to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to open Europe’s borders to illegal migrants arriving from the third world.

“On the one hand you want to demonstrate generosity and take in refugees, but the more generous you are, the more word gets around about this — which in turn motivates more people to leave Africa,” Gates told the Sunday newspaper.

“Germany cannot possibly take in the huge, massive number of people who are wanting to make their way to Europe.”

Bill Gates saying this will be met by winks and nods of approval from the elite progressives.

Donald Trump saying this makes him a racists xenophobe.

Strange world we live in.

Gates is a Globalist. Seems he's concerned about this causing a problem with his foundations deadly vaccination programs.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Dear fucking god!!! Please tell me how asking if Colmes is still on Fox(sarcasm btw, ANYone can pick that out) translates to 'He doesn't know Colmes died! LOL"

Anyone else pick up on this stab at humor? Anyone.....?

[The_Noble_Cause]

Trump ceased being a run of the mill doofus as soon as he took the oath. He's since been elevated to Presidential Doofus Almighty. He's kept to a higher standard...supposedly.

Again, you are citing imaginary invisible rules that don't exit. Turn off The West Wing re-runs. Also, please stop comparing 'T' to past presidents. You and Monkey demanded that talk about Clinton, Obama, etc be saved for separate threads. Be consistent!

[S2M]

Trump ceased being a run of the mill doofus as soon as he took the oath. He's since been elevated to Presidential Doofus Almighty. He's kept to a higher standard...supposedly.

Again, you are citing imaginary invisible rules that don't exit. Turn off The West Wing re-runs. Also, please stop comparing 'T' to past presidents. You and Monkey demanded that talk about Clinton, Obama, etc be saved for separate threads. Be consistent!

Imaginary rules? So if Trump the lying businessman(Trump University ) did something questionable, it should be treated the same as if Trump the President did the same questionable thing?

I don't think that's an imaginary invisible rule. As soon as you take the oath you are immediately held to a higher standard. Is this getting through Boggs? Can you read?

[S2M]

Seems you guys missed the memo, Trump is setting his new, own standards, with the blessing of half the population. Embrace the suck, elections have consequences and oh, he WON!

S2M and Monker are just upset that Trump is draining the swamp. Alot of their leaders are that swamp.

Please get a better grasp on the english language. There is no such word as 'alot'. it's 'A lot'. Thanks.

[Monker]

You're wrong.

You are not the arbiter of right/wrong and true/false. You are a disgusting proven liar.

Wow. Listen to mini-Trump bitch go! Do you have small hands, too?

But, if you TRULY wanted to know the evidence you would want an independent investigation.

We investigate crimes, not evidence. Name the crime. For that matter, name some evidence.
[/quote]

I'll name the crimes
George. That way you can be sure to love it, hug it, cuddle it, and take it home.

George includes:
Russia hacking
Trump organization colluding with Russia.
Obstruction of justice.
Abuse of power.

That is not your aim, nor is it the aim of the alt-right. Your aim, and there's, is to continue a Trump presidency regardless of anything he has said or done that may prevent it.

The aim is the Trump agenda (MAGA). That is what we voted for. As proven above, the impeachment talk already began long before the election. It's knee-jerk, silly, and reactionary.

Trump's agenda dies with appeal/replace. Now it is just "repeal", which if that passes, IMO, Democrats will crush anybody who voted for it in 2018.

I love facts.

Yeah, sure.

99.999% of my posts on here are disproving your lies with REAL FACTS.

Well, see throwing up guesses like "99.999%" is called opinionating. It is NOT a fact.

Not pushing alternative facts like "Hillary had permission to use a private server"

Let me explain this to you. When you exagerate something by saying I was "pushing" something you are turning your statement into a LIE.

or your claim above that the impeachment talk did not pre-date the election. Which it did.

I did not claim that, so you are lying again. I was replying to your entire paragraph being "wrong". In other words, that if you want to know the "facts", you would want a public investigation. When impeachment talk started has nothing to do with you not wanting to know what the facts are.

There is a scene in "All the President's Men" where they thought they got something wrong. They were both prepared to resign. The fact is that sometimes the press gets it wrong.

So your basis for an investigation is reporters who are continually wrong. Very strong case.

So, now you are lying again. This has nothing to do with my "basis for an investigation". I have stressed it so even a Trump-bitch like you would understand that I want it so the facts are publicly known. My reason for posting the above was to show that in these types of investigations, the press sometimes gets it wrong. it doesn't mean it is a vast left-wing conspiracy.

You are living in a fantasy. Nobody gives a shit about a President who has 30-35% approval rating,

Where have I heard this before?
Prior to the election, major newspapers said Trump had 180 predicted electoral votes to Hillary's secured 300 electoral votes. Huffington Post gave Trump a 1.6% chance to win. NYTimes gave Trump a 24% chance to win. The figures, data, and models you hold up to support your outdated worldview are now meaningless. We just saw this again in Georgia. In reality, Trump's approval is probably above 50%.

And, then Comey spoke and Hillary crashed.

If you look at the FINAL set of polls prior to election, they are very accurate. They have Clinton ahead nationally less than %5...dead on. Even most of the battleground states were predicted accurately.

You would just rather use polls two weeks or more prior to the election...rather than the night before.

...and who has not passed a single piece of significant legislation.

Not how presidencies work.

Oh, please that's crap. If he doesn't get it passed in his first year in office, he probably won't get it passed.

FDR is an unique example of both a President dealing with economic depression and a world war.

And if Bannon succeeds in raising taxes on the rich - oh boy, look out

Yeah, look out. Chicken Little would be right, the sky is falling.

No Republican led congress is going to pass that.

So now the crime has gone from "Russian collusion" to forgetting to check a tiny box on an SF 86 form. Is this really the best you got?

It's more than a check on a form. Ask Manafort.

I'm so tired of this. If you watch the interview above, there is an entire section where Buckley very carefully (and skillfully) dances around accusing the press of putting Nixon on trial via their stories. Their answer was that is what the committees and special prosecutor are for. Yes, they may share some of the same information. Some even given to them via leaks. But, the press only sees the tip of the iceberg of what the real evidence is...which is what I have been saying - from the beginning of this. Imagine that...everything Woodward and Bernstien reported, the Watergate papers, the tapes - that was just THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG as far as evidence goes.

I don't care about the racist and homophobic Buckley. He would probably be a NeverTrumper if still around. I don't care about Nixon comparisons either. It's as lazy and desperate as Hitler comparisons. Can you debate facts and reality as it exists today in July 2017? All indications point to NO.

Yeah, just ignore the point . It doesn't change the FACT that the committees will hear and receive a mountains more evidence that we will ever know about through the press...and using only what you know from the press is never going to be enough to prove guilt or establish innocence.

The same thing is going on right now with Trump...and you will NOT know what all the evidence is. Period.

Like I said, you would make a great tour guide at the Area 51 gift shop.

What about area 52, ancient astronauts, the face on Mars, aliens on the moon, hangar 18?

And, witch hunt. That's bullshit. You love Dershowitz so much...he said that on a scale of one to 10 that this "witch hunt" ranks about a 4. He said there was more a witch hunt of Bill Clinton because of how far the investigation dove into his private life.

In other words, you hate witch hunts except when they are aimed at Republicans. I haven't provided my opinion on Ken Starr either way. To paraphrase you, go start a Clinton thread and discuss that shit over there.

So, that's what Dershowitz was saying. I thought he was simply saying that calling this Trump thing a witchhunt is bullshit. His first words, before comparing it to Clinton, were "not even close". Maybe you can better understand that instead of being distract by Bill>

[slucero]

going on one year of investigation(s)...

• Russia hacking
• Trump organization colluding with Russia.
• Obstruction of justice.
• Abuse of power.

Charges filed?

None.

[Memorex]

going on one year of investigation(s)...

• Russia hacking
• Trump organization colluding with Russia.
• Obstruction of justice.
• Abuse of power.

Charges filed?

None.

Maybe someone in the administration should have made a Meme hurting CNN's feelings. They'd find their sources pretty quick then.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Imaginary rules? So if Trump the lying businessman(Trump University ) did something questionable, it should be treated the same as if Trump the President did the same questionable thing?

I don't think that's an imaginary invisible rule. As soon as you take the oath you are immediately held to a higher standard. Is this getting through Boggs? Can you read?

You still didnt name any rules/laws. Regarding conflicting business dealings, there is a case to be made for the emoluments clause. But you didn't name that or anything. Oh well. Just because you think every sitting President should conduct themselves like Bill Pullman in Independence Day doesn't make it so. Sorry.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Wow. Listen to mini-Trump bitch go! Do you have small hands, too?

Just a few posts back, you and S2M were both vag-flapping about insults hurled on this forum. You also wanted to prohibit any mention of past presidents. Yet you guys engage in this non-stop. It’s no wonder you fools look to the nanny state to dictate your behavior. You clearly have as much self-control as Jan Michael Vincent at an open bar.

I'll name the crimes
George. That way you can be sure to love it, hug it, cuddle it, and take it home.

Aww that’s cute. Two sentences in and you are already showing your true misogynist and homophobic colors.

Russia hacking

Hacking of the private email account of John Podesta is NOT a government concern. Sorry. Unless you are advocating for the nationalization of private email? Same with the DNC. Neither of these are government entities. They are private. Why would that warrant a government investigation? Would you be up in arms if Brazil hacked the private email of the John Birch Society? Did we have a government investigation when Sony was hacked? How about when our own CIA hacked Senate computers?

Trump organization colluding with Russia.

These are conspiratorial accusations without any basis in fact. I said name actual crimes. If the Russia theory is such a slam dunk, why didn’t the DNC allow their servers to be examined yet? What's the hold up?

Obstruction of justice.

Nobody cares. Where is the “justice” in accusing a president of treason without any evidence?

Trump's agenda dies with appeal/replace. Now it is just "repeal", which if that passes, IMO, Democrats will crush anybody who voted for it in 2018.

You are really under the impression that Obamacare is popular. You couldn’t be more wrong. Premiums hikes in October contributed more to Hillary losing than any Russian phantom menace.

Well, see throwing up guesses like "99.999%" is called opinionating. It is NOT a fact.

I’ll make the distinction real simple for you. You parroting that “Hillary had permission to use a private server” is an example of a lie. While me saying “No, she did not” is a fact. Speaking of which, have you been able to get the name of the staffer that was fired by the Clinton campaign for starting the birther rumor? Of course not. That was you again uncritically repeating Hillary Clinton/DNC propaganda. That’s all you do on here.

Let me explain this to you. When you exaggerate something by saying I was "pushing" something you are turning your statement into a LIE.

When you repeat blatant lies, that’s “pushing.” Call it echoing, disseminating, whatever.

In other words, that if you want to know the "facts", you would want a public investigation.

By this standard, you should be demanding that the DNC servers are examined, right?

When impeachment talk started has nothing to do with you not wanting to know what the facts are.

Here are some uncomfortable facts for you…

-The 17 intelligence agencies claim, used as the basis for the Russia investigation, has been exposed as bullshit.
-The ODNI report cited Russia Today programming as an example of Russia influencing our election. One problem – shows mentioned had been off the air for years.
-Crowdsrike, the DNC-contracted cyber firm, walked back their initial hacking allegations.
-To date, the DNC servers have not been examined by anyone outside of the DNC-employed Crowdstrike.

Now, you were saying? Something about facts?

I have stressed it so even a Trump-bitch like you would understand that I want it so the facts are publicly known.

So you want a special investigation into Russian hacking before the servers that were hacked have been examined? It’s like sentencing a murderer to the electric chair before inspecting the murder weapon. Talk about putting the cart before the horse. Sounds to me like you just want an investigation to politically damage the President and the country. The facts and the truth be damned.

And, then Comey spoke and Hillary crashed.
If you look at the FINAL set of polls prior to election, they are very accurate. They have Clinton ahead nationally less than %5...dead on. Even most of the battleground states were predicted accurately.

So go ahead and post those polls. The only statistician pushing that is Nate Silver. His polling has been consistently wrong. He was wrong again most recently about the Georgia special election. Vast majority of pollsters said the Comey letter was negligible at most.

You would just rather use polls two weeks or more prior to the election...rather than the night before.

Actually, with the exception of the electoral college prediction, everything I posted was from the night of the election. No reason to lie.

Oh, please that's crap. If he doesn't get it passed in his first year in office, he probably won't get it passed.

Again, not what voters judge presidents on.

FDR is an unique example of both a President dealing with economic depression and a world war.

Voters don’t need to be standing in breadlines to discern if a President is fighting for what he believes in.

Yeah, look out. Chicken Little would be right, the sky is falling.
No Republican led congress is going to pass that.

GOP Congress will not go along with impeachment either. But that is not stopping you from entertaining that deranged fantasy. As the Heritage Foundation told GOP members, “Trump has converted the GOP into a populist working-class party.” Even if Bannon’s tax hike doesn’t pass, the optics of Trump fighting to raise taxes on the rich will damage the Democrats on so many levels. They deserve it.

Yeah, just ignore the point . It doesn't change the FACT that the committees will hear and receive a mountains more evidence that we will ever know about through the press...and using only what you know from the press is never going to be enough to prove guilt or establish innocence.

In other words, because you can’t prove something (i.e. Russian Collusion) you are now relying on blind faith that it exists and we are just not privy to it. You resistance assholes sound exactly like the Heavens Gate cultists polishing their Nikes waiting for the Hale-Bop mothership to arrive. Worse yet, you sound more brainwashed than Jonathan Cain.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Please get a better grasp on the english language. There is no such word as 'alot'. it's 'A lot'. Thanks.

What a loser.

Playing the grammar or spelling card is really as low as it gets. Truly desperate.

[Boomchild]

[S2M]

Please get a better grasp on the english language. There is no such word as 'alot'. it's 'A lot'. Thanks.

What a loser.

Playing the grammar or spelling card is really as low as it gets. Truly desperate.

Nah. That'd be playing the Trump card.

[Boomchild]

OOPS!

http://nation.foxnews.com/2017/07/06/sc ... aign-chief

But wait, you need you need to look "over there". There's nothing to see here.

[Boomchild]

AP officially retracts "17 agencies" report on the Russian hacking story.

Clarification: Trump-Russia stories

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In stories published April 6, June 2, June 26 and June 29, The Associated Press reported that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Donald Trump. That assessment was based on information collected by three agencies - the FBI, CIA and National Security Agency - and published by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which represents all U.S. intelligence agencies. Not all 17 intelligence agencies were involved in reaching the assessment.

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/ ... 0-17-32-29

[S2M]

So this sour puss bitch on CNN just interviewed some euroweenie about the G20 Summit and I swear I'm not making this up, but her first question to the euroweenie was, " So we know the meeting today between Trump and Merkel is over, we know it lasted about an hour, so tell me euroweenie, do we know if Merkel was able to out maneuver Trump today during the talks?"

Unreal!

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him. There was a 'report' last week that he looked 'bored, and disinterested' during the healthcare meetings. Every time he's in front of the camera he plays the victim...just wants attention. Admittedly, I was seriously debating voting for him before he became the nominee. Then he sort of went ultra-rogue.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

[Boomchild]

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him. There was a 'report' last week that he looked 'bored, and disinterested' during the healthcare meetings. Every time he's in front of the camera he plays the victim...just wants attention. Admittedly, I was seriously debating voting for him before he became the nominee. Then he sort of went ultra-rogue.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

You mean just like every democrat, progressive liberal, snowflake or antifa activist does. If this was true then, "pot meet Kettle". Speaking of playing victim, since the last election Hillary has everyone beat in this category by a mile.

[S2M]

So this sour puss bitch on CNN just interviewed some euroweenie about the G20 Summit and I swear I'm not making this up, but her first question to the euroweenie was, " So we know the meeting today between Trump and Merkel is over, we know it lasted about an hour, so tell me euroweenie, do we know if Merkel was able to out maneuver Trump today during the talks?"

Unreal!

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him. There was a 'report' last week that he looked 'bored, and disinterested' during the healthcare meetings. Every time he's in front of the camera he plays the victim...just wants attention. Admittedly, I was seriously debating voting for him before he became the nominee. Then he sort of went ultra-rogue.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

And again you liberal stupid fucks don't get it. That's why he won, and your team keeps losing. You are even too stupid to see your party is the one splitting down the middle now. Some of you have left it, some want full blown communisim, others want to get back to the middle. The Democratic party is a bunch of don't matter issue groups that are all thinking they are more important then the others. BLM, LGBT, Greennies, ect. Your all starting to fight among yourselfs .Mean while, your losing election, after election,after election. I'm loving it. Your other stupid remark about no other country respecting Trump is just a bald face lie, but I've come to expect that from you and Monker. Frankly Obama had zero respect from Russia, China, Israel, Syria, Iran, North Korea, ect. And why should they? Iran, China, North Korea, and Russia made a complete idiot out of Obama. Well, that's not fair. He did it to himself.

Hey KFC...at least I'm not a card-carrying member of NAMBLA, unlike yourself.

For the millionth time - I'm not, nor have I ever been a liberal. I just don't care for that sad excuse for a president. He is obviously on the spectrum. Are YOU on the spectrum? Makes sense now....

[Boomchild]

[The_Noble_Cause]

Just now another sour puss on CNN brought up 17 agencies again. They really have no shame. It's comical TV.

Yea, Acosta is so well-read he didn't even know that NYT (among others) retracted this whopper.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him.

So because Trump was elected, America should be disrespected? Y'know, many liberal academics says 9-11 was a form of "blowback" too. Are you also OK with 3,000 Americans dying? Sure sounds like it.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

And yet you are the loudest voice on here (besides Monker) talking down your own country. My, how very patriotic of you.

[S2M]

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him.

So because Trump was elected, America should be disrespected? Y'know, many liberal academics says 9-11 was a form of "blowback" too. Are you also OK with 3,000 Americans dying? Sure sounds like it.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

And yet you are the loudest voice on here (besides Monker) talking down your own country. My, how very patriotic of you.

Hey Santa...try and keep up. That comment was directly in response to the question asked to the 'euroweinee'. He's not respected, so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please....keep relying on your diversionary tactics. Calling me 'unpatriotic' is neither logical, nor warranted in this case, nor ANY other case for that matter.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Hey Santa...try and keep up. That comment was directly in response to the question asked to the 'euroweinee'. He's not respected, so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please....keep relying on your diversionary tactics.

Ah, so you were referring specifically to Merkel but at the same time the entire global foreign community?
Which is it? You are all over the place, man. You sound like Palin describing seeing Russia from her doorstep. Pure verbal diarrhea.

Calling me 'unpatriotic' is neither logical, nor warranted in this case, nor ANY other case for that matter.

Gee, you act like somebody on here said you are choosing "party over country." Oh wait. That's YOU. Multiple times accusing me, FF, and KC of treason. I would love for you to say that to our collective faces.

[S2M]

Hey Santa...try and keep up. That comment was directly in response to the question asked to the 'euroweinee'. He's not respected, so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please....keep relying on your diversionary tactics.

Ah, so you were referring specifically to Merkel but at the same time the entire global foreign community?
Which is it? You are all over the place, man. You sound like Palin describing seeing Russia from her doorstep. Pure verbal diarrhea.

Calling me 'unpatriotic' is neither logical, nor warranted in this case, nor ANY other case for that matter.

Gee, you act like somebody on here said you are choosing "party over country." Oh wait. That's YOU. Multiple times accusing me, FF, and KC of treason. I would love for you to say that to our collective faces.

If I ever get the chance I will.

[The_Noble_Cause]

Hey Santa...try and keep up. That comment was directly in response to the question asked to the 'euroweinee'. He's not respected, so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please....keep relying on your diversionary tactics.

Ah, so you were referring specifically to Merkel but at the same time the entire global foreign community?
Which is it? You are all over the place, man. You sound like Palin describing seeing Russia from her doorstep. Pure verbal diarrhea.

Calling me 'unpatriotic' is neither logical, nor warranted in this case, nor ANY other case for that matter.

Gee, you act like somebody on here said you are choosing "party over country." Oh wait. That's YOU. Multiple times accusing me, FF, and KC of treason. I would love for you to say that to our collective faces.

If I ever get the chance I will.

Try it.

[Boomchild]

Man, this is just toooooo much...

CNN President Jeff Zucker on Wednesday said President Trump is trying to bully the news network, but added that he won't let Trump "intimidate" his employees.

“My job is to remind everyone that they need to stay focused doing their job,” Zucker told The New York Times Wednesday. “He’s trying to bully us, and we’re not going to let him intimidate us. You can’t lose your confidence and let that change the way you conduct yourselves.”

Something tells me Zucker will not be CEO for much longer.

[ohsherrie]

[so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please.

Why should anybody care whether or not President Trump behaves "Politically Correctly" as long as he accomplishes what we need him to? Part of the reason he is the president is because he isn't "one of them", you know, the swamp people.

[S2M]

[so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please.

Why should anybody care whether or not President Trump behaves "Politically Correctly" as long as he accomplishes what we need him to? Part of the reason he is the president is because he isn't "one of them", you know, the swamp people.

When he accomplishes something of substance, let me know.

[Monker]

[so actual politicians should be expected to 'school' him in political arenas. I.E. Angela Merkel....but again, please.

Why should anybody care whether or not President Trump behaves "Politically Correctly" as long as he accomplishes what we need him to? Part of the reason he is the president is because he isn't "one of them", you know, the swamp people.

Yeah, he sold you that "drain the swamp" crap pretty well. Can't really get rid of swamp people when you hire them and almost completely surround yourself with people who grew up in this so called "swamp".

He isn't interested in any of this crap. He just wants the power. And, it's power that he doesn't even know how to wield. Pathetic.

[Monker]

Again, you conservative fucks still don't get it. Trump doesn't act presidential. THAT'S where this blowback comes from. He knows ZERO about foreign policy, and not ONE foreign leader respects him.

So because Trump was elected, America should be disrespected? Y'know, many liberal academics says 9-11 was a form of "blowback" too. Are you also OK with 3,000 Americans dying? Sure sounds like it.

Again, you guys are ALL party over country. it's pathetic.

And yet you are the loudest voice on here (besides Monker) talking down your own country. My, how very patriotic of you.

I'm not talking down my own country. I am saying we already are a great country. We didn't need Trump to come in and be an ass. HE is the idiot here. HE is what/who I talk down. By the simple fact that he is President he turns our great country into a second rate nation that would rather follow than lead, who rather isolate itself rather then take its rightful place as leader of the free world. Donald Jackass Trump is not a great leader, a great deal maker, a great man, a great speaker, a great politician, a great business man, or ga reat human being . All he is is a salesman....and morons like you bought into his pitch.