The_Noble_Cause wrote:Let’s put this in grade school terms – a person who repeats obvious and provable falsehoods is a what?
That person is someone who believes the electoral college is an example of a representative democracy.
That person is someone who believes the city council does not represent the people who ELECTED them.
That person is someone who takes conversations about the above and write out of context ad-hominem attacks and lies because like the Trump zombie he is refuses to admit he is wrong, as he fuhrer would do.
Monker wrote:That is because half your brain doesn't work because you are a Trump zombie.
The Russia investigation by the FBI led to the congressional investigation and now the special counsel investigation into Trump in general.
Again, no details. Just “something something Russia something something.”
And, again, you take a quote out of context so you can make shit up and LIE, as you do in EVERY POST YOU MAKE.
You said my words did not make sense so I explained them to you. There was NO mention of requesting "details" or any such thing. Your zombie brain is inventing conversation that actually happened later in your reply and causing you to make shit up and lie.
Monker wrote:That's because you pay too much attention to the drama in the news and do not realize that things like the 17 agencies blah, blah, blah are not going move Mueller one way or another because it is political BS.
The 17 intel consensus was the basis for the Russia hacking allegation. It is not political BS at all. Without it, there is no basis for an investigation.
Well, there you go lying again.
The Russia investigation had begun in mid-2016 due to the NSA telling the FBI that it had intercepted Trump people talking to Russians. The intel consensus came out MUCH later.
Monker wrote:But, since all of this is classified - you don't know what evidence has been gathered and who is being offered deals. Not even Trump's lawyers know these things yet.
In your previous post you said Trump was headed to prison.
Well, that is another lie. I sad IF people turn he PROBABLY will go to jail, unless he is pardoned. That is not even close to what you said above. Here is the quote, "You KNOW that if people start turning (Flynn/Mannafort/etc) that Trump is probably going to jail, unless pardoned by Pence."
Can you make ANY point WITHOUT lying about SOMETHING?
Monker wrote:You are looking at it from the POV of Sean Hannity, not a federal prosecutor. Sean Hannity is entertainment and games..
I didn’t need Hannity
I didn't say you did....I said you are looking at the Russia investigations from his POV...IE: everything is a scandal, Trump is roses, and fake media this and that...all done to prick at your emotions and gain ratings, and invent stuff to play games.
(or any talking head) to tell me that the 17 intel agencies talking point was BS. The Coast Guard and the DEA are not involved in cyber foreign intelligence gathering. I heard that same lie spoken by Colin Powell in the lead up to Iraq War – it was an obvious lie then. This lie is trotted out every time the country is trying to manufacture consent for war. Idiots, like you, fall for it.
Except there isn't anybody looking for consent for war...that is that your conspiracy theory. But, besides that, my point is you are so focused in on irrelevant points like these you fail to see the big picture of what Mueller is looking at. Your zombie brain has bought into Trump's "it's all made up by the fake media..."
I have heard that Preet Bhara, Sally Yates, and James Comey were all going to serve the death knell to Trump. Hasn’t happened. Doubt Mueller will either.
Interesting how you compare witness testimony to a federal prosecutor.
If the electors did not represent the popular votes in their states, you would be able to point to a time when they overturned the election results. You can’t. In over 240 years it has never happened.
I find it incredible that you are this ignorant on how our elections work. The electors DO NOT REPRESENT THE VOTERS. They represent their party. Period. That is the way it is.
You’re the guy wanting political opponents thrown in jail without any evidence of a crime.
And, you are the guy who makes shit up and lies repeatedly IN ONE POST. See above, I never said this.
Monker wrote:It doesn't need to change the election to PROVE that they electors do NOT represent the people. The very fact that they have the ability to vote how they want PROVES they do not represent the people.
As already mentioned, in over half the states, the electors are bound to vote for the popular vote winner.
And, as I have mentioned, it is the federal constitution which established the electoral college and there is no mention of this. Therefore, the state laws could, and should, be challenged in court.
Cite an example where the electors changed the outcome of the election. You can’t. The system works. You just don’t agree with the result.
LOL...there you go, making shit up again.
I have NEVER said Trump did not win the election, or the result was "wrong" somehow.
What I have said is he entered the Presidency with a minority of the popular vote and was therefore a weak President. He needed to gain support to be able to effectively govern. THAT is where I stood in January.
Also, I have NEVER believed in the electoral college from the time I learned what it was and how the election truly works...decades ago, even before W. It has NOTHING to do with this election, but YOU not accepting the FACTS of what it is and how it works.
This is very very weak innuendo. If the special counsel wasn't just a fishing expedition, the goal posts wouldn't keep moving (hacking - obstruction of justice - money laundering).
That is what a special prosecutor does...he looks for crimes and impeachable acts. That is how you go from Whitewater to lying about a blow job.
Monker wrote:Because I read it in a string of Emails.
So you read a lie in an email, fell for it, and posted it here. What does that say about you? A gullible email-reading moron repeating a lie is still a liar.
[/quote]
Even if your exaggerated bullshit were true. I would rather have that happen, admit it, and move on....Then write a note like this one, and some of your others, that are riddled with lies that you will ignore and not acknowledge. That says a lot about your lack of character and inability to have an "honest" conversation but instead jump off the rails with made up bullshit.
And, if I remember the context, it was in the midst of a bunch of pro-Trump "winning" this and that bullshit.