Hope You're All Happy

by **SuiteMadameBlue** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:39 am

Yep, I hope you're all happy. This board is looking like the Journey board. It's really sad and I know a bunch of you just don't care and will keep going on with the personal attacks and rehash the same crap all the time.

Have a GREAT day!!

by **froy** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:42 am

SuiteMadameBlue wrote:Yep, I hope you're all happy. This board is looking like the Journey board. It's really sad and I know a bunch of you just don't care and will keep going on with the personal attacks and rehash the same crap all the time.

Have a GREAT day!!

Im ok I finally found the person I been searching for
Everybody Sing Now

by **yogi** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:53 am

And it only took Froy( batman) finding his Its My Life (robin) to throw our ENTIRE Styx world in disarray. I hope you are happy now Froy!! I will now sign your damn petition!!!!!!

Who would of EVER thought of Froy teaming up with Shooze?????

by **classicstyxfan** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:14 am

Yeah, it's a little bit like the Hatfields and the McCoy's on here lately......

or is that the Monkfields and the McFroy's ??????

by **Guest** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:35 am

classicstyxfan wrote:Yeah, it's a little bit like the Hatfields and the McCoy's on here lately......

or is that the Monkfields and the McFroy's ??????

Double Standards.

Newsflash: Styx died in 1999.

by **Guest** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:36 am

yogi wrote:And it only took Froy( batman) finding his Its My Life (robin) to throw our ENTIRE Styx world in disarray. I hope you are happy now Froy!! I will now sign your damn petition!!!!!!

Who would of EVER thought of Froy teaming up with Shooze?????

Says the guy who said that Styx 2000-2005 is just as good as Styx 1976-1983.

:roll:

by **Monker** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:38 am

Yeah, it's a little bit like the Hatfields and the McCoy's on here lately......

or is that the Monkfields and the McFroy's ??????

If that is directed in my direction, then I want to say that I take offense to that remark. I do not take arguments on this forum to the point of insults, such as been done lately. Things have sunk a bit lower then when Froy and I would have discussionish discussions.

by **Zan** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:42 am

Monker wrote:
Yeah, it's a little bit like the Hatfields and the McCoy's on here lately......

or is that the Monkfields and the McFroy's ??????

If that is directed in my direction, then I want to say that I take offense to that remark. I do not take arguments on this forum to the point of insults, such as been done lately. Things have sunk a bit lower then when Froy and I would have discussionish discussions.

I think Classic was just making a play on words, and you guys' names fit the mold. From what I know of Classic, he is far from malicious, and I think anyone with a brain in their head understands the difference between the way you argue and what's happening now.

by **Guest** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:03 am

Zan wrote:I think Classic was just making a play on words, and you guys' names fit the mold. From what I know of Classic, he is far from malicious, and I think anyone with a brain in their head understands the difference between the way you argue and what's happening now.

Says the instigator. :roll:

by **styxfanNH** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:32 am

Don't feed the pig

by **classicstyxfan** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:18 am

Monker,

it is just as Zan Explained it...........

The Adamfields or the Chicagostyxfields just did not fit into my wordplay.

oh, and by the way, I've been enjoying the humor in some of your posts
recently. when you choose to inject it, you do it quite well.

IML evidently feels I am the recipient of a free pass or the "double standard" here......maybe, bit IML, perhaps you havent figured out that I dont take 99 percent of what is said here all that seroiusly. Most of my posts are written with the objective of looking at the lighter side of things
.....and to maybe bring a smile or 2 to others here. Monker wondering if he should be offended by my post is a first, at least to my knowledge, of me offending anyone here. If my tongue-in-cheek humor using a posters name has offended anyone here, I'd like to know, so I can apologize. I think most here understand me though.

What does get under my skin is when the attacks on other posters here get personal.....it's not necessary for anyone here to stoop to that level, especially about something so trivial as a Rock and Roll band or it's members.......If you look back over my posts the last 2 years, the only people I have attacked are those who have attacked others on a personal level here 1st....It's uncool, and it really says a lot about that person...if you or anyone else "sees yourself in the mirror" upon reading this, you are most welcome to join the rest of us in the post high-school world.

( end of rant )

by **bugsymalone** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 8:44 am

Most of my posts are written with the objective of looking at the lighter side of things
.....and to maybe bring a smile or 2 to others here. Monker wondering if he should be offended by my post is a first, at least to my knowledge, of me offending anyone here. If my tongue-in-cheek humor using a posters name has offended anyone here, I'd like to know, so I can apologize. I think most here understand me though.

There is a fine line between the humor and what one perceives as an insult. I think you walk it very well, Classic. I find many of your posts very funny and I hope you keep it up.

As I have said before, there are some who have a problem with humor. Not sure WHAT they think is funny. :roll:

And IML. Please, smaller avatar!!! You too SFNH. I think they are fine, don't get me wrong, just TOO BIG!

Bugsy

by **styxfanNH** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:13 am

Sorry Suite,
It was smaller on the site I grabbed it from. Just haven't had a chance to make it smaller. But now I have. Should be fine now.

by **onestilllearning** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:22 am

Chill[/b]

by **ek88** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 1:13 pm

classic:

Your posts don't upset me at all, but I will be circling that next Cowboys-Packers matchup on the calendar someday . . . LOL!

by **Monker** » Fri Apr 22, 2005 2:40 pm

classicstyxfan wrote:Monker,

it is just as Zan Explained it...........

Ok, that's fine....it just seemed you were comparing my bouts with froy to what is happening now...my mistake.

oh, and by the way, I've been enjoying the humor in some of your posts
recently. when you choose to inject it, you do it quite well.

Well, if you take this stuff too seriously, it will drive you nuts. I'm sure some people could find evidence of that happening on this forum.

MR

Hope You're All Happy

Hope You're All Happy

Re: Hope You're All Happy

Who is online