jrnyman28 wrote:This is one of the best posts ever.
However, my one debate is that Journey might not be around at all if Perry had stayed. One, Neal and Perry might not be able to get along well enough to work together anymore; Two, Perry could be (to me, he IS) reluctant to tour.
You are correct! More than likely, either one would happen - especially Perry and Schon not getting along.
Thinking about it in the perspective of Trial By Fire, the band had been gone for 10 years - they come back and get quite a bit of radio air play with 'When You Love A Woman'...and the song gets nominated for a grammy. This happens during the point of the 90's where classic rock bands were merely nostalgic acts you heard at a local fair - not the big arena thing. Bands like Hootie and the Blowfish or Matchbox 20 ruled the airways. For Journey to have so much press and exposure with TBF was an outstanding feat! The album was not a very strong album at all! And..they did it with their classic orginial lineup from the 80's.
I don't believe Journey would have had as much press or been nominated for a grammy with another lead singer - especially one that was not well known prior to joining Journey. Believe me, popularity in today's music doesn't always mean singing skills ya know! That is why I believe having orginial members of the band - especially lead vocals - is extremely important to classic acts that are trying to get respect in today's music.
Now...the point of the debate is: what if Journey had switched lead singers in the 80's....after ROR? Well, they basically did by forming Bad English. Van Halen has been the only band I know of that could be possibly more commerically successful without their orginial lead vocalist under the orginial band name. Kansas switched lead singers and had an outstanding vocalist in John Elefante, but they didn't enjoy as much success.
I believe you have to put Journey in a different category from the rest of those bands...because Perry, back in those days, had a unique voice that people still recognize today as Journey. It would have been different if Steve Perry started out as a solo vocalist (like Sammy Hagar did before joining VH,) but Journey and Steve Perry's commerical success came after Perry had joined the band.
The point I'm trying to make in my rambling is that Journey is a great band with or without Perry in my eyes. However, for Journey to ever have the same respect like they did in the 80's, you'd have to have Perry in the band; Steve Perry himself said, "Carry on if you want to, just don't call it Journey." Of course that is not his decision as it was Neal's band in the first place, but what Perry says is true until Journey can have large commercial success...especially here in the states.