DDY - Article (Omaha) Um, very interesting!

Paradise Theater

Moderator: Andrew

Re: ...

Postby Ash » Sat Aug 19, 2006 9:57 pm

Zan wrote:
Ash wrote:People like JY are usually unreceptive to critisism and surround themselves with people who will echo what they say. This includes attorneys, family and people like Zan. People who find no fault in what they have done - or are willing to forgive the faults in some that they won't forgive in others.



WTF. Because I don't co-sign YOUR bullsh*t, I'm echoing everything JY says? I find no fault in JY or anyone else who dislikes Dennis or some of the things he's done because I don't believe every line of crap my "friends" in the DeYoung camp feed me? Or is it because I don't display constant and continuous hostility towards him day in, day out like you do?

Oh that's right. You're not hostile. I keep forgetting.




heh.... guess I'm not the only one capable of profanity laced diatribes eh?

Look - all I'm saying is that if JY sues Dennis with the intent of trying to keep Dennis from touring, promoting himself or his music then isn't he just as big of an ass as Dennis was for suing Styx back in the late 90s? And yet on another forum when I asked how people would react if this happened many on this forum (which has a much more pro-current-styx slant) reacted with "Oh its just another lawsuit - big deal" when you know that if the tables were reversed there'd be a crucifixion.

I'm guess I'm too naieve at this point to assume anyone's opinion could be changed at this point. Everyone has basically picked their side.

On another note - I realize my note sounded like I was picking on Zan and singling her out and that actually wasn't my intent - so for that I apologize. I was just trying to use her as an example of how the other side argues and it wasn't meant to sound like a value judgement. So for that I hope you accept this as my apology for that.
User avatar
Ash
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Housewares

Re: ...

Postby Zan » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:04 am

Ash wrote:
Zan wrote:
Ash wrote:People like JY are usually unreceptive to critisism and surround themselves with people who will echo what they say. This includes attorneys, family and people like Zan. People who find no fault in what they have done - or are willing to forgive the faults in some that they won't forgive in others.



WTF. Because I don't co-sign YOUR bullsh*t, I'm echoing everything JY says? I find no fault in JY or anyone else who dislikes Dennis or some of the things he's done because I don't believe every line of crap my "friends" in the DeYoung camp feed me? Or is it because I don't display constant and continuous hostility towards him day in, day out like you do?

Oh that's right. You're not hostile. I keep forgetting.




heh.... guess I'm not the only one capable of profanity laced diatribes eh?



I guess. I do try to keep it to a minimum and use acronyms or alternate words, but don't let that stop your knee from jerking! Be true to yourself. lol



Look - all I'm saying is that if JY sues Dennis with the intent of trying to keep Dennis from touring, promoting himself or his music then isn't he just as big of an ass as Dennis was for suing Styx back in the late 90s? And yet on another forum when I asked how people would react if this happened many on this forum (which has a much more pro-current-styx slant) reacted with "Oh its just another lawsuit - big deal" when you know that if the tables were reversed there'd be a crucifixion.



You're making huge assumptions here. As I recall, the majority of people from that board responded with overwhelming indifference, because many of us, just don't care that much anymore. That goes for either side.


I'm guess I'm too naieve at this point to assume anyone's opinion could be changed at this point. Everyone has basically picked their side.



Well, sides were chosen way back when, and people still have their preferences, but as far as "sides," I think that (on every other board except this one) kinda stopped years ago.


On another note - I realize my note sounded like I was picking on Zan and singling her out and that actually wasn't my intent - so for that I apologize. I was just trying to use her as an example of how the other side argues and it wasn't meant to sound like a value judgement. So for that I hope you accept this as my apology for that.



If what you're saying is that "people like Zan" are people that come from the "south side" of the river Styx, then ok, but you should know that even WE don't care that much about this stuff anymore. It's just annoying to read the constant bashing on here sometimes. I'd rather see people build their guys up than tear the others guys down. Tearing down was soooo 2002. ;-)
-Zan :)

believe me, i know my Styx

Image

Shiny things
User avatar
Zan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3668
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:24 am
Location: PARADISE

Re: ...

Postby StyxCollector » Sun Aug 20, 2006 4:56 am

Zan wrote:[Well, sides were chosen way back when, and people still have their preferences, but as far as "sides," I think that (on every other board except this one) kinda stopped years ago.


100% agree here. I've been slammed for being neutral all along, and at this point, "camps" makes no sense. As with Journey, if you support one singer (or side) versus another, there's no point in tearing one down to build another up.

Just be thankful we had 1996 and 1997. Otherwise 1991 would have been the end for the "formal" Styx legacy. The glory days are long gone, and the bus I doubt is coming back.
User avatar
StyxCollector
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:14 am

Re: ...

Postby Ash » Sun Aug 20, 2006 12:25 pm

Zan wrote:If what you're saying is that "people like Zan" are people that come from the "south side" of the river Styx, then ok, but you should know that even WE don't care that much about this stuff anymore. It's just annoying to read the constant bashing on here sometimes. I'd rather see people build their guys up than tear the others guys down. Tearing down was soooo 2002. ;-)



And yet tearing down is what JY has been doing to a section of Styx' music catalog for the last 7 years. With JY - the tearing down never ends. In fact, his tearing down of people's music is almost cringe-inducing.



That said, I did not intend for what I said to sound as much like a personal attack as it did - so my apologies.
User avatar
Ash
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2004 3:13 pm
Location: Housewares

Re: ...

Postby Zan » Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:41 am

Ash wrote:
Zan wrote:If what you're saying is that "people like Zan" are people that come from the "south side" of the river Styx, then ok, but you should know that even WE don't care that much about this stuff anymore. It's just annoying to read the constant bashing on here sometimes. I'd rather see people build their guys up than tear the others guys down. Tearing down was soooo 2002. ;-)



And yet tearing down is what JY has been doing to a section of Styx' music catalog for the last 7 years. With JY - the tearing down never ends. In fact, his tearing down of people's music is almost cringe-inducing.



That said, I did not intend for what I said to sound as much like a personal attack as it did - so my apologies.



So noted. Thank you for explaining. I do agree that one side ripping the other is daft. But I think "joining them" at their level gets nothing accomplished. been there, done that, got the internet stalker.
-Zan :)

believe me, i know my Styx

Image

Shiny things
User avatar
Zan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3668
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:24 am
Location: PARADISE

Postby Zan » Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:47 am

Blue Falcon wrote:Maybe JY is bitter because even with DDY and all those cringe-inducing songs he could at least look out at a crowd of 15,000 at the Capital Centre near where I live outside DC.

But now? In June they were back and played Belmont Country Club...which holds no more than 1,000. :oops:

Maybe JY suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder.



I hope this won't qualify as tearing anyone down (lol), but I did some research, and this venue not only holds more than 1000 people, but the night Styx played there they had an attendance of over 6,000. :shock: :lol:

Just sayin'.
-Zan :)

believe me, i know my Styx

Image

Shiny things
User avatar
Zan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3668
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:24 am
Location: PARADISE

Re: ...

Postby Liam » Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:45 am

StyxCollector wrote:
Zan wrote:[Well, sides were chosen way back when, and people still have their preferences, but as far as "sides," I think that (on every other board except this one) kinda stopped years ago.


100% agree here. I've been slammed for being neutral all along, and at this point, "camps" makes no sense. As with Journey, if you support one singer (or side) versus another, there's no point in tearing one down to build another up.

Just be thankful we had 1996 and 1997. Otherwise 1991 would have been the end for the "formal" Styx legacy. The glory days are long gone, and the bus I doubt is coming back.


I'm just glad I've got a '97 boot (2 actually). Last great Styx tour IMO. :-)
Liam

"It ain't how hard you can hit. It's how hard you can get it, and keep goin'." - Rocky
User avatar
Liam
MP3
 
Posts: 10064
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:54 am

Re: ...

Postby StyxCollector » Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:53 pm

Escape79 wrote:I'm just glad I've got a '97 boot (2 actually). Last great Styx tour IMO. :-)


That tour has bad memories for me, and was the beginning of a 2 - 3 year period where I didn't listen to Styx or anything related. I'll leave it at that. That's how much the band had pissed me off at the time.

'97 also marks the only show I ever walked out of - the NJ Garden State Arts Center. Once I heard "Queen of Spades", I was gone. I had heard enough. It was the only real rarity on that tour anyway (ok, so you got "Dear John" and "On My Way", but who's counting?).
User avatar
StyxCollector
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:14 am

Re: ...

Postby stabbim » Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:16 pm

Escape79 wrote:I'm just glad I've got a '97 boot (2 actually). Last great Styx tour IMO. :-)



'97 wasn't what I would call "great," either. The seams were showing.

StyxCollector wrote:Once I heard "Queen of Spades", I was gone. I had heard enough. It was the only real rarity on that tour anyway (ok, so you got "Dear John" and "On My Way", but who's counting?).


And by that point in the set you would have already heard "On My Way," so.....
"Bored now." -D. Rosenberg
User avatar
stabbim
8 Track
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:23 am
Location: Incognito?!?

Re: ...

Postby StyxCollector » Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:58 pm

stabbim wrote:'97 wasn't what I would call "great," either. The seams were showing.


Showing? ha! That's an understatement. I felt '97 was very much "going through the motions". I saw one show before the Arts Center one and was underwhelmed. I think it was Atlanta, and I left during the encore. I usually never do that.

IMHO JY and Tommy can say what they want, but they should have NOT toured in '97 and given it a rest. The attendance was lower also because the novelty had worn off. Honestly, I felt that Pat Benatar as an opening act had more energy than Styx both shows.

stabbim wrote:And by that point in the set you would have already heard "On My Way," so.....


Which I genuinely enjoyed. The "Dear John" moment was nice as well. The rest was all formula.
User avatar
StyxCollector
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:14 am

Re: ...

Postby stabbim » Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:37 pm

StyxCollector wrote:Honestly, I felt that Pat Benatar as an opening act had more energy than Styx both shows.


Certainly they seemed more cohesive and in the moment. I got tired of Husband/Guitarist Dude's banter, but at least he wasn't scripted to the letter.

StyxCollector wrote:
stabbim wrote:And by that point in the set you would have already heard "On My Way," so.....


Which I genuinely enjoyed. The "Dear John" moment was nice as well. The rest was all formula.


Ayup. And that's not atypical for a Styx show in general, but in this case it was clearly symptomatic of something more serious. All of which is too bad, cause I think the band actually sounded really good at that point.
"Bored now." -D. Rosenberg
User avatar
stabbim
8 Track
 
Posts: 730
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:23 am
Location: Incognito?!?

Re: ...

Postby StyxCollector » Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:46 pm

stabbim wrote:Certainly they seemed more cohesive and in the moment. I got tired of Husband/Guitarist Dude's banter, but at least he wasn't scripted to the letter.


Exactly. Tommy stand stage right ... NOW! Yawn. I understand it's part of the Styx way - even now - but two years and a million shows later, meh. 97 was little more than a retread of the year before.

stabbim wrote:Ayup. And that's not atypical for a Styx show in general, but in this case it was clearly symptomatic of something more serious. All of which is too bad, cause I think the band actually sounded really good at that point.


Agreed. They sounded better than 1996 - tighter for sure. If I was blind, I may have enjoyed the show. That's no disrespect to those who are blind, but if all you had to base your comparison of 96 to 97 would be audio, you would say, "That's a tight band!" But I also think that you would say recording(s) of 96 would have more emotion and heart in 'em. Even "Queen of Spades" in 97 for as good as it sounded, didn't seem like they band was at all into it. "Dear John" was the only moment that truly struck me as genuine in the show.
User avatar
StyxCollector
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2361
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 9:14 am

Postby Zan » Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:39 pm

Zan wrote:
Blue Falcon wrote:Maybe JY is bitter because even with DDY and all those cringe-inducing songs he could at least look out at a crowd of 15,000 at the Capital Centre near where I live outside DC.

But now? In June they were back and played Belmont Country Club...which holds no more than 1,000. :oops:

Maybe JY suffers from Narcissistic Personality Disorder.



I hope this won't qualify as tearing anyone down (lol), but I did some research, and this venue not only holds more than 1000 people, but the night Styx played there they had an attendance of over 6,000. :shock: :lol:

Just sayin'.



Replying to my own post here because it was in error. The venue does hold >6,000. But according to the guy at the venue website, Styx brought in between 2500-3000 that day. Blue Falcon was exaggerating, but I was likely inaccurate with my figures. Carry on...
-Zan :)

believe me, i know my Styx

Image

Shiny things
User avatar
Zan
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3668
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:24 am
Location: PARADISE

Re: ...

Postby rajah2165 » Tue Aug 22, 2006 2:09 am

Zan wrote:
rajah2165 wrote:The market on BS is exclusively yours.



That's funny coming from a guy who brags about having 47 different screen names and access to fifty computers.


Then I guess we are BOTH full of it, then...
STYX 5.1 IS A JOKE
rajah2165
LP
 
Posts: 497
Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:18 am

Previous

Return to Styx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests