brywool wrote:Having been in bands for years, it may not have been ego but just vision. In bands, usually all members have a different "Vision" on what the band should be and where the band should be headed. For example, Tommy and JY have always wanted it to be a ROCK band. Dennis, seemed happy that it was a rock/pop band. So he would tend to steer it that way and T, JY would tend to steer it back to the other direction. I don't think it's that Dennis would go "We do this because I am Dennis DeYoung, the LEADER and all be all of Styx" I think it's more that "You know guys, we could get a number one hit with Babe and that'd be good for us" (in Dennis' mind). In T, JYs mind that'd be "That's not how we see ourselves, we don't care if it's number one, it's not what we see Styx as".
In bands it's always a compromise to some point. Sometimes you're playing with guys that "just don't get it". Other times, you're playing with guys that really want to stretch the band, sometimes into something the band really isn't or doesn't want to be.
Dennis seems like he's got a pretty strong personality. JY seems similar but in the opposite direction. Tommy always said "Dennis was the cheerleader. He'd always be telling US how great we were and I'd be saying 'maybe we're not as great as you think Dennis' ". Notice Dennis didn't say (at least in Tommy's quote) how great HE is? I think that everything Dennis did, he thought was for his vision of Styx. Same with the other two. I don't think that means they thought THEY were the reason the band was so successful. Otherwise, you'd have Dennis coming out and saying "I wrote every hit that band had and they're nothing without me". He doesn't say that.
I don't agree with Zan's quotes regarding The Beatles, and how desiring fame is a 'sick thing' or whatever. Some people just go "Wow, I love that sound and I think I could do that because I love music and can play". Fame is a byproduct of being an artist, not necessarily the reason for doing something. I think that was more true in the 60s and 70s than now. I think now that FAME is the impetus for record companies pushing certain artists (Beyonce, Britanny, blah blah). In the early years, I think it was more "I can make a living doing this". I know that I've done it forever and it's more that I've discovered that I was good at it not because I wanna be d' king.
LOL, those were actually MY quotes regarding the Beatles and the need for attention that drives people to seek fame as being a sick thing. Please note, I did not say that everyone who plays music is driven by a sick need. But I will steadfastly maintain that most - not all, but the vast, overwhelming majority of those that SEEK FAME as musicians are driven by damaged personalities and the resulting unhealthy ego needs. Understand I am not saying that all ego is inherently unhealthy . . . in fact it is necessary for the music business, and people that don't have enough of it will be destroyed by the process of trying to compete at that level. For someone like Denis, for instance, his ego is both the source of much of his power, and his Achilles heel all rolled into one.
How do you explain why every single successful band you could care to name seems to be comprised of damaged people, and why do we see the exact same problems unfold in every band? Pretty coincidental, don't you think? I'm not saying that actually getting fame and money don't warp people. They do, they just make it worse, no doubt. But most of them started out damaged and just got worse because of being overindulged, as opposed to going from being totally normal to being really wacky. Furthermore, most of the people I know in the business that work with successful bands are very much aware of this and discuss it freely all the time. For that matter, most of the artists know it, too. It just doesn't get said much in public because it's not very promotional.
I hope all is well.
Sterling