saint John wrote:Tomulator wrote:saint John wrote:Tomulator wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUKSHViWNHw&mode=related&search=
And in case you need ANOTHER example of why I think Luke is the premier player around today...

Dude, whipping your ass in arguments is actually less fun than picking dingleberries out of King Kong's asshole. You're a fuckin' tard. Take your Luke-lovin' ass elsewhere. He's good...no doubt, but he's NO Neal Schon.
I so disagree with you on this. I've been playing guitar for 26 years and I know a little about the instrument and what it takes to play certain things and certain styles. That being said, it is my INFORMED opinion that Luke is the more versatile, technically-savvy player of the two. AS great as NS is (and he is great, btw), he is not on par with Luke. It's just that simple.
Now, on to the more curious topic of asking you how it is you are so familiar with King Kong's asshole...does that kind of thing excite you?

When you see Steve playing at Six Flags tell him I said hi. I'll be watching Neal play to at least 7,000-10,000 people after they release their new album. If you're fast, you can beat Luke to the rollercoaster line. I heard it gets packed when him and his shitty band play there.

You obviously have NO CLUE as to how big Toto is in Europe...MUCH bigger than Journey. Have been for years. That is fact.
Two different bands. Two different styles. Two different audiences for the most part.
BTW, 7,000-10,000 people is not that huge of an audience. I saw Toto this summer play for ~40,000 (maybe more) in Ohio on July 4th. They absolutely KILLED.
Now, let's talk about which guitarist has played on the most albums...wanna go there? Luke has been THE MAN for years on the studio scene, since the 70's. He has played on, helped produce, and written for more records for more different artists from more diverse musical genres than Neal could ever dream of. That also is fact. But you know what? You are way too close-minded and limp-dicked to even have this discussion with. It is a waste of my time.
Your arguments are weak (just like you I bet), poorly laid out, and have no "meat" to them (again, just like you I bet).
Sorry about your luck.
