Monker wrote:He was hired for the same reasons Perry was - and that included bring a more vocal sounds to a mostly instrumental band.
That is hilarious Monker...."more vocal sounds"...like it was an mere embellishment rather than one of the MAIN REASONS for Journey's eventual success.
In fact, I would take "Wheel In the Sky" over something like "Patiently" any day.
Oh I'm sure you would. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me if you said it was the greatest song you ever heard.
No...Herbie managed other bands to the top of their game during the late 80's. These bands could have been Journey...but they blew it. Read the Castles Burning interview for examples. Herbie continued on to success without Journey...Journey could not do the same without Herbie.
Well, it's certainly true that Mr Big had a Number One hit single in 1992 with "To Be With You" but other than that this moment of glory the band were nowhere near as big as Journey were in the early 1980s. Nowhere near. And by 1994 Mr Big weren't charting at all. Whereas Journey were....
Absolutely. He took over Herbie's job. He was even deciding album covers and album names. He took on changing their sound and the band itself. Yes, it is Perry's fault - he took on the role and he should take the responsibility.
I've already said - twice - that Perry has taken the responsibility for ROR and has never distanced himself from that project. As for the power shift...well, of course that happened. But this was a serious flaw in Herbert's management. He got out-witted by the talent. Hardly the act of an awesome Zvengali who can do no wrong.
IMO - 1985-87 was under PERRY's watch - not Herbie's.
I'd agree. And in that time they recorded their third AOR masterpiece in a row...
AI would have been content with ROR, if it didn't suck...and Perry would have deserved most of the credit....instead he gets most of the blame.
Monker - if ROR hadn't sucked in your world it would still absolutely kill you to give Perry any credit. I can hear it now...."It was only brilliant because Herbert allowed Perry the space to explore new territory"..."It was Jonathan Cain who was really the musical genius behind that record"... "Neal Schon played so well because he was 'detached' from the project and approached it with 'objectivity' because Perry was nasty to him..."
A couple of pages back I tried to demonstrate to NMT that I wasn't some flaming Perry fanatic and I listed a few criticisms of the guy to show that I was capable of being vaguely reasonable and balanced on the subject. One day I'd love to hear you come up with - say - five reasons why Perry was good for this band or what makes him an extraordinary talent or ANYTHING which isn't whiney or bitchy about the guy.