OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Voted Worlds #1 Most Loonatic Fanbase

Moderator: Andrew

OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Enigma869 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:53 am

What a dope. The guy says he felt like a real "plonker", whatever the hell that means. These damn Brits use the dopiest words I've ever heard in my life!

http://www.walletpop.com/2008/03/31/up- ... um-balloo/


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Postby NealIsGod » Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:54 am

You ever find any articles about people we can look up to, John? :lol:
User avatar
NealIsGod
MP3
 
Posts: 12512
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 2:20 am
Location: Back in Black

Postby youkeepmewaiting » Thu Apr 03, 2008 1:57 am

Yes us Brits do use some dopey words, it's called the "English Language". I think Americans should start using it correctly :)
User avatar
youkeepmewaiting
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 10:35 pm
Location: Liverpool, England

Postby yulog » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:02 am

NealIsGod wrote:You ever find any articles about people we can look up to, John? :lol:



Nig you can look up to see the balloon flying away.Image
User avatar
yulog
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4285
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 1:33 pm

Postby jrnychick » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:07 am

I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
jrnychick
8 Track
 
Posts: 618
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:52 am

Postby Behshad » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:22 am

youkeepmewaiting wrote:Yes us Brits do use some dopey words, it's called the "English Language". I think Americans should start using it correctly :)


Fuck off. English enough for you!? :lol:
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Arkansas » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:38 am

English or American English?
Big difference.


later~
Arkansas
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 2571
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:23 am
Location: duh?

Postby conversationpc » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:40 am

youkeepmewaiting wrote:Yes us Brits do use some dopey words, it's called the "English Language". I think Americans should start using it correctly :)


You guys use British-English correct and we use American-English correctly. It's just that American-English isn't as dopey-sounding. :lol:
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby Blueskies » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:43 am

jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Postby yulog » Thu Apr 03, 2008 2:55 am

Can anyone find the off button?Image
User avatar
yulog
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 4285
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 1:33 pm

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:02 am

Blueskies wrote:
jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.


Awww that is such a sweet, romantic way of looking at it...however, a good karat runs 10 to 15 grand these days...He should spend two to three months salary on the engagement ring...just think of all the good stuff HE is getting for his investment!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby Just Mindy » Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:08 am

This is the first thing that came to mind...

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
Just Mindy
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3515
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 8:26 am

Re: OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Gin and Tonic Sky » Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:16 am

Enigma869 wrote:What a dope. The guy says he felt like a real "plonker", whatever the hell that means. These damn Brits use the dopiest words I've ever heard in my life!

http://www.walletpop.com/2008/03/31/up- ... um-balloo/


John from Boston


The term plonker started out as a reference to someone who was forever drunk on cheap wine (cheap wine is nicknamed plonk) this person was usualy a homeless person, or poor person. Today the term plonker is a very light hearted insult.

Better and more insulting British words for a moron (I learned all the good stuff when I moved to England) include : chump , thicko , knobhead , twat , fuckwit, pillock, complete arse. :D
Matt
User avatar
Gin and Tonic Sky
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1926
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 7:46 am
Location: in a purple and gold haze

Postby Blueskies » Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:26 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.


Awww that is such a sweet, romantic way of looking at it...however, a good karat runs 10 to 15 grand these days...He should spend two to three months salary on the engagement ring...just think of all the good stuff HE is getting for his investment!!! :wink:
Marriage should not be looked at and entered into as an "investment"..and to "get something"...or that anyone is owed anything....true love doesn't have to be purchased. Two people should come together because they love each other and want to spend their time in life together....not out of any needs , financially or otherwise...or expectations of the other fullfiling them.....doesn't work out well that way. Does she really love the man?..or is it just love of the idea of marriage and security?...sounds like it to me...sounds like love for the ring and it's worth and not for the man and his.. besides his wallet...not for his worth of heart.
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Re: OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Enigma869 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 8:57 am

Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:The term plonker started out as a reference to someone who was forever drunk on cheap wine (cheap wine is nicknamed plonk) this person was usualy a homeless person, or poor person. Today the term plonker is a very light hearted insult.

Better and more insulting British words for a moron (I learned all the good stuff when I moved to England) include : chump , thicko , knobhead , twat , fuckwit, pillock, complete arse. :D


And now I just learn that the Brits refer to "French Toast" as "Poor Knights Of Windsor". You guys call that "English"???? Oy Vey :shock: :shock: :shock:


John from Boston
User avatar
Enigma869
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 7753
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:38 am
Location: Back In The Civilized Part Of U.S.

Re: OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Rick » Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:01 am

Enigma869 wrote:
Gin and Tonic Sky wrote:The term plonker started out as a reference to someone who was forever drunk on cheap wine (cheap wine is nicknamed plonk) this person was usualy a homeless person, or poor person. Today the term plonker is a very light hearted insult.

Better and more insulting British words for a moron (I learned all the good stuff when I moved to England) include : chump , thicko , knobhead , twat , fuckwit, pillock, complete arse. :D


And now I just learn that the Brits refer to "French Toast" as "Poor Knights Of Windsor". You guys call that "English"???? Oy Vey :shock: :shock: :shock:


John from Boston


What do they call French Fries :?:
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby sadie65 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 9:06 am

When I heard about this a few days ago, all I could think is that it should be a blessing in disguise for this man. A potential spouse valuing a chunk of glass on a piece of metal as this woman did/does is a big warning sign to me.
I stress, for me, it was never necessary to have someone spend that kind of money to somehow prove their love for me. That he made a foolish mistake is one thing. That she should go to this level...quite another.

Hopefully he realizes she is most likely not the best choice in a spouse.
Sadie
sadie65
Stereo LP
 
Posts: 3037
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 4:08 am

Postby Michigan Girl » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:10 am

Blueskies wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.


Awww that is such a sweet, romantic way of looking at it...however, a good karat runs 10 to 15 grand these days...He should spend two to three months salary on the engagement ring...just think of all the good stuff HE is getting for his investment!!! :wink:
Marriage should not be looked at and entered into as an "investment"..and to "get something"...or that anyone is owed anything....true love doesn't have to be purchased. Two people should come together because they love each other and want to spend their time in life together....not out of any needs , financially or otherwise...or expectations of the other fullfiling them.....doesn't work out well that way. Does she really love the man?..or is it just love of the idea of marriage and security?...sounds like it to me...sounds like love for the ring and it's worth and not for the man and his.. besides his wallet...not for his worth of heart.

I was kinda joking about the whole ring thing...but since this came up
I disagree...marriage is a HUGE investment....just like having children, it is unknown territory for any first timer and costly, Although LOVE is the main ingredient, marriage requires much MORE than LOVE...as beautiful as that WOULD be!!! :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Re: OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Loneman1 » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:14 am

Rick wrote:What do they call French Fries :?:


I believe they call them chips, as in "fish and chips."
Rock on,
Eric
User avatar
Loneman1
8 Track
 
Posts: 808
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:52 am
Location: Utah, formerly from the Bay Area, CA

Re: OT: Jackass Loses Engagement Ring In Balloon

Postby Rick » Thu Apr 03, 2008 10:23 am

Loneman1 wrote:
Rick wrote:What do they call French Fries :?:


I believe they call them chips, as in "fish and chips."


I think you're right. It's almost as if they want nothing to do with France. 8)
I like to sit out on the front porch, where the birds can see me, eating a plate of scrambled eggs, just so they know what I'm capable of.
User avatar
Rick
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 16726
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:29 am
Location: Texas

Postby Blueskies » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:26 am

Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.


Awww that is such a sweet, romantic way of looking at it...however, a good karat runs 10 to 15 grand these days...He should spend two to three months salary on the engagement ring...just think of all the good stuff HE is getting for his investment!!! :wink:
Marriage should not be looked at and entered into as an "investment"..and to "get something"...or that anyone is owed anything....true love doesn't have to be purchased. Two people should come together because they love each other and want to spend their time in life together....not out of any needs , financially or otherwise...or expectations of the other fullfiling them.....doesn't work out well that way. Does she really love the man?..or is it just love of the idea of marriage and security?...sounds like it to me...sounds like love for the ring and it's worth and not for the man and his.. besides his wallet...not for his worth of heart.

I was kinda joking about the whole ring thing...but since this came up
I disagree...marriage is a HUGE investment....just like having children, it is unknown territory for any first timer and costly, Although LOVE is the main ingredient, marriage requires much MORE than LOVE...as beautiful as that WOULD be!!! :wink:
See now your turning it around..first you were referring to his investment monatarily so thats what I commented on.....now your talking about a whole different kind of investment.....time, commitment, patience, trust, understanding, forgiveness, supportiveness, etc., etc...dealing with the ordinary day to day.and in times of stress and strife..the good times and the bad..loving for and despite flaws as well as strengths..theres no disagreement with that. That all comes with the deep love and care you feel for the other..makes you want to do all you can for them and to see them happy.....so it's not more than love after all...it all comes from love...so thats what I meant..if the love is right from the start then it will grow and overcome all obstacles and challenges put before it....if it's not then it will fail and break apart....especially if someone goes in with their mind foremost on the monatary and material worth of one another instead of the worth of their heart, mind and spirit. In the long run things mean nothing....the love that is shared is all that matters in the end..what will be taken and what will be left behind....the older one gets the more this is realized..and hey, I'm an artist....idealistic, passionate and a hopeless romantic...so cut me some slack if you think I view things thru rose colored glasses..I see the beauty in the depth of real love from the heart and felt in the soul...and believe thats what we should feel, have and share in a marriage, a relationship, a family....but thats just me. :wink: 8)
Blueskies
Digital Audio Tape
 
Posts: 9620
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Michigan Girl » Fri Apr 04, 2008 2:15 am

Blueskies wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
Michigan Girl wrote:
Blueskies wrote:
jrnychick wrote:I heard about this last week. What an idiot. I think he's an even bigger idiot for blowing $12k on a ring.
Exactly! 12 grand for a ring? Ridiculous! If his girlfriend required him to spend that much on a stupid ring,..and now not talking to him since he lost it?...Losing the ring doesn't make him an idiot..not being able to see that she's high maintenance , will continue to want unneccesary extravagances and is not in it for the right reasons..he should see that and is better off without her. If she loved him right, she wouldn't want a ring that cost that much...or even care too much about one anyway..the right girl would have laughed at his flubup and would still be marrying him, ring or no ring.


Awww that is such a sweet, romantic way of looking at it...however, a good karat runs 10 to 15 grand these days...He should spend two to three months salary on the engagement ring...just think of all the good stuff HE is getting for his investment!!! :wink:
Marriage should not be looked at and entered into as an "investment"..and to "get something"...or that anyone is owed anything....true love doesn't have to be purchased. Two people should come together because they love each other and want to spend their time in life together....not out of any needs , financially or otherwise...or expectations of the other fullfiling them.....doesn't work out well that way. Does she really love the man?..or is it just love of the idea of marriage and security?...sounds like it to me...sounds like love for the ring and it's worth and not for the man and his.. besides his wallet...not for his worth of heart.

I was kinda joking about the whole ring thing...but since this came up
I disagree...marriage is a HUGE investment....just like having children, it is unknown territory for any first timer and costly, Although LOVE is the main ingredient, marriage requires much MORE than LOVE...as beautiful as that WOULD be!!! :wink:
See now your turning it around..first you were referring to his investment monatarily so thats what I commented on.....now your talking about a whole different kind of investment.....time, commitment, patience, trust, understanding, forgiveness, supportiveness, etc., etc...dealing with the ordinary day to day.and in times of stress and strife..the good times and the bad..loving for and despite flaws as well as strengths..theres no disagreement with that. That all comes with the deep love and care you feel for the other..makes you want to do all you can for them and to see them happy.....so it's not more than love after all...it all comes from love...so thats what I meant..if the love is right from the start then it will grow and overcome all obstacles and challenges put before it....if it's not then it will fail and break apart....especially if someone goes in with their mind foremost on the monatary and material worth of one another instead of the worth of their heart, mind and spirit. In the long run things mean nothing....the love that is shared is all that matters in the end..what will be taken and what will be left behind....the older one gets the more this is realized..and hey, I'm an artist....idealistic, passionate and a hopeless romantic...so cut me some slack if you think I view things thru rose colored glasses..I see the beauty in the depth of real love from the heart and felt in the soul...and believe thats what we should feel, have and share in a marriage, a relationship, a family....but thats just me. :wink: 8)


YOU are absolutely RIGHT!!!! and I LOVE your passion :wink:
Michigan Girl
MP3
 
Posts: 13963
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 8:36 am

Postby journeypower » Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:26 pm

I know that the price of an engagement ring in GB is quite absolutely insane. I believe I could give him half the price of what he paid for. I could give him a very good 2CT. stone for a value of 6k only. :)
journeypower
45 RPM
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:17 pm


Return to Journey

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests