finalfight wrote:Magwheels wrote:finalfight wrote:Magwheels wrote:It wasn't the NYTimes. It was one person. So you're funny too. Plenty have liked the other albums as well. This is about what we all knew was going to happen with Andrew.
Would you be happier then if Andrew, whom we all know LOVES melodic rock slates what is frankly an amazing new melodic rock album from the finest exponents of the craft? What the hell would that achieve other than ruin the man's credentials for honest reporting.
The review was purely about the music and would stand no matter the artist.
Wow...why it bothers you so much that I'm just saying it's obvious, is beyond me. Others in the past have disagreed with Andrew- a little bit to BIG TIME. I'm not even doing that here.
So assuming you have heard it are you saying that you like the new album but would prefer that Andrew gave it a bad review? I must admit that I don't understand your reasoning. I would bloody well hope Andrew would enjoy it as its a fine release. A good album is a good album, regardless.
No. All I'm saying is I knew it would get the rating it did. Even with the ballads and "slowness" of it(hence the Bryan Adams comparison)..which in a post prior to submitting his review he said even those songs have been kicked up or whatever. So he had it covered.
That's...all...I'm...saying.



