Religion & Morality

General Intelligent Discussion & One Thread About That Buttknuckle

Moderator: Andrew

Postby verslibre » Thu Sep 15, 2011 6:51 pm

parfait wrote:There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Except...piss!


:lol:
"Heer's ta swimmen wid bowlegged wimmen!"
verslibre
Compact Disc
 
Posts: 6873
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 12:55 pm

Postby majik » Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:00 am

parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby Behshad » Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:16 am

majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


Bingo! He will never understand that Theories =/= Fact !
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby parfait » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:09 am

majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.

Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.
User avatar
parfait
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1527
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:38 pm
Location: France

Postby Behshad » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:19 am

parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.

Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.


But in your mind : EVERY THEORY = FACT!

Half of your BS youve copied and pasted in the past are still in the THEORY stage, but in YOUR mind, since you agree with them , you have decided that they are indeed FACTS and not theories no more .
Image
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby S2M » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:06 am

Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby majik » Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:42 am

parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.

Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.



"This is getting old"
This is ever fresh and ever new and never repeats itself yet always remains real. While theories/ideas on the other hand become old and tired and need to be re-written.

"Theory->Laws->Hypothesis->Facts."
More accurately put...... Reality-> Real. -> theory ( ideas ) ->laws (theory) ->Hypothesis (theory)-> Facts (theoretical) -> Reality. All about reality, begins with Reality and ends with Reality.

Silence is not the lack of sound, its a known real phenomenon that doesn't cease when sound is generated, silence is always present and is not the opposite of sound.

Look up the word theory in the dictionary its meaning does not change when used scientifically vs. everyday use, now that is bull crap. :roll:

Both the Pope and the scientist are snake oil charmers :lol:
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby Duncan » Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:44 pm

majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.

Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.



"This is getting old"
This is ever fresh and ever new and never repeats itself yet always remains real. While theories/ideas on the other hand become old and tired and need to be re-written.

"Theory->Laws->Hypothesis->Facts."
More accurately put...... Reality-> Real. -> theory ( ideas ) ->laws (theory) ->Hypothesis (theory)-> Facts (theoretical) -> Reality. All about reality, begins with Reality and ends with Reality.

Silence is not the lack of sound, its a known real phenomenon that doesn't cease when sound is generated, silence is always present and is not the opposite of sound.

Look up the word theory in the dictionary its meaning does not change when used scientifically vs. everyday use, now that is bull crap. :roll:

Both the Pope and the scientist are snake oil charmers :lol:


You are just plain wrong.
User avatar
Duncan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Sadly Broke, South Glos

Postby steveo777 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:05 pm

S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...


This is a classic post from you, almost like you got drunk and uttered those words right into the mirror and the crap that reflected back....well, you simply posted it on the first internet forum where you didn't need to remember the password to log in. Good Job, Sean! :wink: :P :lol:
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby Argus » Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:13 pm

S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post
Last edited by Argus on Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
~*~ Please behave before I have to slap you naked and hide your clothes! ~*~ Argus-eyed = carefully observant or attentive; on the lookout for possible danger ~~Blog Link
User avatar
Argus
8 Track
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 8:11 am

Postby steveo777 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 5:18 pm

Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.


Ain't that known as "artificial intelligence"? Cut-n-Paste professors abound! :shock: :D
User avatar
steveo777
MP3
 
Posts: 11311
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:15 pm
Location: Citrus Heights, Ca

Postby majik » Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:37 pm

Duncan wrote:
majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
parfait wrote:
majik wrote:
Greg wrote:
parfait wrote:
Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......


You can't be serious.

One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).

Dumbest. argument. ever.


Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.



Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.


If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.

It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.



Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.

The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.

As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.

There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !


This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.

Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.



"This is getting old"
This is ever fresh and ever new and never repeats itself yet always remains real. While theories/ideas on the other hand become old and tired and need to be re-written.

"Theory->Laws->Hypothesis->Facts."
More accurately put...... Reality-> Real. -> theory ( ideas ) ->laws (theory) ->Hypothesis (theory)-> Facts (theoretical) -> Reality. All about reality, begins with Reality and ends with Reality.

Silence is not the lack of sound, its a known real phenomenon that doesn't cease when sound is generated, silence is always present and is not the opposite of sound.

Look up the word theory in the dictionary its meaning does not change when used scientifically vs. everyday use, now that is bull crap. :roll:

Both the Pope and the scientist are snake oil charmers :lol:


You are just plain wrong.



Exactly !!!!!

If you have read my previous posts I have repeated often that No concept, theory/idea,label, word or combination of words or symbols can explain what This here/now Is. Given that the dictionary is full with words I would have to be just plain WRONG by default. There is no claim here to be right about anything, its all Wrong thats what I Am saying!!

The religious will tell you they are right and throw scripture at you, the scientist will tell you they are right and throw theories at you which then becomes belief.
As I said before Words Can Only Point to reality and what reality is cannot be said but it can be Known in experiencing. No words or theory is needed to experience "This" is-ness.

Forget what you've been told and experience what this is for yourself As It Is and not what you think it is or ought to be. Is it world? thats a concept, is it body and biochemical ? thats a concept, all propped up by more concepts. Throw all the conceptualisation away for a moment does "this" disappear ? no.... but the concepts do!! Now throw "this"( what is ) away........ it can't be done can it ? because its Reality.

Its liberating to Know I Am wrong about everything than to be limited by a mind full of belief in concepts/theories and ideas. Try it, its freedom, not for the person but from the person.

Maybe I'll finish here with that instead of adding more waffle to the waffle. :)
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby Duncan » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:15 pm

I have read all your posts and haven't a clue what your talking about. Do you have a lot of crystals in your house?
User avatar
Duncan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Sadly Broke, South Glos

Postby majik » Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:58 pm

Duncan wrote:I have read all your posts and haven't a clue what your talking about. Do you have a lot of crystals in your house?



Well thanks for reading, not sure if your question is for laughs but the answer is no, no crystals. I do agree that I'm on a different wave length and most likely not understood but if one word like " theory " can be so misunderstood its to be expected.
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby S2M » Fri Sep 16, 2011 10:21 pm

Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post



Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Argus » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:00 am

S2M wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post



Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.


Well, considering you were getting flak over the quote I thought I would help you out by citing where it came from :wink:
~*~ Please behave before I have to slap you naked and hide your clothes! ~*~ Argus-eyed = carefully observant or attentive; on the lookout for possible danger ~~Blog Link
User avatar
Argus
8 Track
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 8:11 am

Postby Behshad » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:08 am

Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post



Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.


Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight :wink:



:lol:
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby Argus » Sat Sep 17, 2011 3:11 am

Behshad wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post



Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.


Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight :wink:



:lol:


ISWYDT :wink:
~*~ Please behave before I have to slap you naked and hide your clothes! ~*~ Argus-eyed = carefully observant or attentive; on the lookout for possible danger ~~Blog Link
User avatar
Argus
8 Track
 
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 8:11 am

Postby S2M » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:18 am

Yeah, and next time you use,

Come hell or highwater
Bend but don't break
A stitch in time.....
Cut off his nose to spite his face
Threw out the baby with the bath water

I want you to cite the originator, ok?

No one was giving me a "hard time" about the passage....you just felt the need to call me out on it.

And B, I'm sad to hear your Transvaginal Mesh Patch Surgery didn't take...such a shame.
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby Behshad » Sat Sep 17, 2011 4:30 am

S2M wrote:
And B, I'm sad to hear your Transvaginal Mesh Patch Surgery didn't take...such a shame.


Well yours only worked cause you paid more and got a better doctor :lol: ;) Wish I had medicaid too :lol:
User avatar
Behshad
MP3
 
Posts: 12584
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:08 am

Postby BobbyinTN » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:23 am

Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."



Absolutely correct!
User avatar
BobbyinTN
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1431
Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 2:12 am

Postby Greg » Sat Sep 17, 2011 5:29 am

S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.


I want you to go back and re-read what you have just written. It applies a lot more toward an atheistic or agnostic way of thinking than it would a religious.
User avatar
Greg
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 2317
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:16 am
Location: Stealth Mode

Postby Duncan » Sat Sep 17, 2011 7:31 am

Behshad wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:
Argus wrote:
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.

The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...



Want to cite this S2M?

"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.

ETA author Jennifer L. Post



Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.


Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight :wink:



:lol:


Just not true, but why focus on the minutia. the truth of the statement stands, but i recognise it applies to both sides of the argument. Nevertheless, our truth comes down to evidence, it all comes back to evidence. By the way, I nicked that line.
User avatar
Duncan
Cassette Tape
 
Posts: 1726
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 8:57 am
Location: Sadly Broke, South Glos

Postby majik » Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:04 pm

S2M "Maybe faith is just a case of not having anything else left?"

When there isn't ANYTHING else left including faith what remains then ?
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby majik » Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:31 am

We know nothing about [God, the world] at all. All our knowledge is but the knowledge of schoolchildren. Possibly we shall know a little more than we do now. but the real nature of things, that we shall never know, never. (The Expanded Quotable Einstein, Princeton University Press, Page 208)
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

Postby S2M » Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:45 am

"Go fuck ye selves.". *S2M 9/17/11*
Tom Brady IS the G.O.A.T.
User avatar
S2M
MP3
 
Posts: 11981
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:43 am
Location: In a bevy of whimsy

Postby artist4perry » Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:24 am

I never understand why it truly matters to those without religion, that others have a faith. If the faith they have causes no harm to anyone, makes them stronger, helps them in times of trouble, and reinforces their love and empathy for their fellow man then truly what is your beef?

The fact that you cannot wrap your head around the concept?

Do you ever think for a moment that what you propose as the explanation for the origins of life itself is a bit hard to just accept because some scientist said so? Scientist are men and quite fallible. Science in itself should always be questioning itself in order to remain a true science. I question those scientists who say they have a good grasp on what is the true theory, without ever allowing anyone to question said theory. We question that theory. Sweet and simple. :wink:
User avatar
artist4perry
MP3
 
Posts: 10462
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 12:42 am
Location: Running around in the vast universe that is my imagination. Send help!

Postby conversationpc » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:31 am

BobbyinTN wrote:
Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."



Absolutely correct!


Absolutely incorrect!

If "faith" actually does cause the contrary, well, then it's not really faith is it? Sounds more like lack of faith to me.
My blog = Dave's Dominion
User avatar
conversationpc
Super Audio CD
 
Posts: 17830
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Slightly south of sanity...

Postby G.I.Jim » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:44 am

BobbyinTN wrote:
Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."



Absolutely correct!


How can you even say this with a straight face? Selfish? Yeah... churches never do anything for communities or people around the world. They don't donate their money to help others. They don't volunteer at homeless shelters and feed the hungry. They don't pool their resources together and help people pay bills or even build some people houses who can't afford them. They really are mean, selfish people. :roll: WTH??? :?
The artist formerly known as Jim. :-)
G.I.Jim
MP3
 
Posts: 10100
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 1:06 pm
Location: Your Momma's house

Postby majik » Mon Sep 19, 2011 2:34 pm

BobbyinTN wrote:
Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."



Absolutely correct!




That imo is the result of belief and not the result of faith.

Belief or beliefs is objective, belief in this (objective) or no belief in that (objective)
The word Faith on the other hand imo, points to the subjective, which cannot be expressed in words, to do so would be back in objective belief.

To assert belief in God is to objectify God.

Faith is silent, still, Knowing out of which flows compassion.


edit; one word for ( perhaps ) clarity.
majik
LP
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 8:40 pm
Location: Perth Australia

PreviousNext

Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests