parfait wrote:There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Except...piss!

Moderator: Andrew
parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
parfait wrote:majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.
Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.
parfait wrote:majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.
Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.
majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.
Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.
"This is getting old"
This is ever fresh and ever new and never repeats itself yet always remains real. While theories/ideas on the other hand become old and tired and need to be re-written.
"Theory->Laws->Hypothesis->Facts."
More accurately put...... Reality-> Real. -> theory ( ideas ) ->laws (theory) ->Hypothesis (theory)-> Facts (theoretical) -> Reality. All about reality, begins with Reality and ends with Reality.
Silence is not the lack of sound, its a known real phenomenon that doesn't cease when sound is generated, silence is always present and is not the opposite of sound.
Look up the word theory in the dictionary its meaning does not change when used scientifically vs. everyday use, now that is bull crap.![]()
Both the Pope and the scientist are snake oil charmers
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
Duncan wrote:majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:parfait wrote:majik wrote:Greg wrote:parfait wrote:Greg wrote:So, the big hoopla against Christianity is that Christians base their evidence on a book that was written by men, who are by nature, flawed. This is the biggest argument Atheists present. Yet, science is studied and tested by, and its textbooks written by, aliens? No, men. The same flawed species. Hhhmmmm......
You can't be serious.
One says the woman was created out of a man's rib, that God made the universe in 6 days and rested on the 7th and that Noah brought all the earth's animals on a fucking wooden boat. The other side has the theory of gravity, evolution and modern genetics (just to mention a tiny, tiny few).
Dumbest. argument. ever.
Yet, it's the same argument you Atheists have been clinging to for years.
Does gravity work better when the theory is known or does it work less when the theory is not known. Its a word that points to an unknowable power that is only truly known experientially and can only be theorised and revised conceptually.
God creating woman out of man's rib is an ancient theory/concept from a time when it was believed the earth was flat, even God is a concept about an unknowable power. God is a misunderstood word that only points to source that can never be known intellectually but it can be experienced, the knowing is in the experiencing. What is light, no scientific mind can say, only that its photons and what is a photon.... it can't be explained but it is known in experience.
What knows this experience ? consciousness does and what is consciousness ? its an unknowable mysterious power that you evidently are. Everything is known in consciousness which is another word for God. Consciousness is the source of all even the concepts God and gravity.
If the theory hadn't been known (theory of general relativity), then we wouldn't have any sort of modern cosmology, as its models are based on Einstein's equations. Of course it works better when the theory is know. Classical physics are based on Newtons theories of motion - without them we wouldn't have modern infrastructure or any sort of proper machine. Consciousness is just a term for the neuronal interactions in the brain and spine. It can be explained perfectly well through science. It's simply put electrical current, traveling between synapses by voltage differences. Your emotions are the complex psychophysiological experience of an individual's state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences.
It's far from a unknowable mystery that I am. I'm the result of the insemination of a sperm cell with its own specific genome and an ovum. The creation of life is pretty awesome, but far from the mystery you make it out to be. You see, the universe/world whatever you want to call it, doesn't care if you I live or die. It's not a sentient being or some other mumbo jumbo bullshit. There's no meaning to anything. No purpose. No nothing. Religion deals with this by making up some sort of goal or purpose.
Clearly you don't know what the word theory means, its an idea or set of ideas about something, ultimately the theory of general relativity is an idea only. The christian has the bible as his handbook and the scientist has his handbook of equations and ideas, no difference and the final word on what this is will never be written.
The universe/world indeed is impersonal and does not care if you or I live or die and sure its not a sentient being, so what! the person is a construct too and only appears in language, there is only impersonal. But its more than "pretty awesome" there is far more unknown than known which means a greater mystery here than you care to admit.
As for biochemical reaction to external stimuli this is at best simplistic and doesn't explain a thing. If hearing sound is the result of a biochemical reaction to external stimuli then what is silence, its not stimulating the mechanics of hearing but the silence is known...... not because of absence but presence, the presence of silence. There is infinite silence in the universe and when I am silent I am that silence and not separate to it. Science knows nothing about silence as its seen as nothing yet it does exist, out of silence sound appears and into it disappears.
Space is what.... nothing, yet its known to exist, not because of biochemicals, space is not nothing it is no-thing.
There is no meaning to anything.....true.
No purpose...... true.
No nothing....... well can you deny existence ? its obviously not nothing, it is however no-thing that can be known or learned through books. Here it is !
This is getting old. There's a major difference between the everyday use of the word theory, and the scientific use of it. A theory is an explanation or model based on observation, experimentation, and reasoning, especially one that has been tested and confirmed as a general principle helping to explain and predict natural phenomena. Facts are interesting, but basically just a testable observation. Theories are the most important thing in science, and consists of logical constructs of facts, tested hypothesis and laws, and is then put together in a logical fashion to understand a natural phenomena. When arranged in order, from most to least important: Theory -> Laws -> Hypothesis -> Facts. This is something one learns in science class in high school - at least here in Europe.
Silence is just the lack of audible sound. Space is far from silent though - maybe for us humans, but it's teeming with sounds. Sounds are just the oscillations of a propagating mechanical wave of pressure through a given medium. Something being unknown doesn't mean that it's mysterious or magical - it's just unknown.
"This is getting old"
This is ever fresh and ever new and never repeats itself yet always remains real. While theories/ideas on the other hand become old and tired and need to be re-written.
"Theory->Laws->Hypothesis->Facts."
More accurately put...... Reality-> Real. -> theory ( ideas ) ->laws (theory) ->Hypothesis (theory)-> Facts (theoretical) -> Reality. All about reality, begins with Reality and ends with Reality.
Silence is not the lack of sound, its a known real phenomenon that doesn't cease when sound is generated, silence is always present and is not the opposite of sound.
Look up the word theory in the dictionary its meaning does not change when used scientifically vs. everyday use, now that is bull crap.![]()
Both the Pope and the scientist are snake oil charmers
You are just plain wrong.
Duncan wrote:I have read all your posts and haven't a clue what your talking about. Do you have a lot of crystals in your house?
Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
ETA author Jennifer L. Post
S2M wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
ETA author Jennifer L. Post
Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.
Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
ETA author Jennifer L. Post
Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.
Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight
Behshad wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
ETA author Jennifer L. Post
Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.
Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight
Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."
S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
Behshad wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Argus wrote:S2M wrote:Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision.
The pope is nothing more than a snake-oil salesman...
Want to cite this S2M?
"Illusion is the easiest magic in the world; because people simply see and believe what they wish to see and believe. It is far more difficult to make someone acknowledge a truth they do not wish to accept, than it is to create a lie which fits their vision." -Larn Sater, The Falcon of Ganst.
ETA author Jennifer L. Post
Snagged it off FB. There was nothing to cite. But thanks for policing my posts. And there was nothing cited where I snagged it from...no big deal. I found it apropos.
Well, considering you were taking credit for the quote I thought I would set you and everyone else straight
BobbyinTN wrote:Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."
Absolutely correct!
BobbyinTN wrote:Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."
Absolutely correct!
BobbyinTN wrote:Duncan wrote:"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid."
Absolutely correct!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests