

Moderator: Andrew
YoungJRNY wrote:It's only a matter of time before Brady joins the invulnerable ranks of Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw with QB's with 4 rings. Hell, if it wasn't for ONE play in '07 & '11, Brady arguably has 5 rings right now. That team is the best coached team I've ever seen and punk's everybody who dares to enter their football stadium. I'd be shocked not to see them representing the AFC this year.
Enigma869 wrote:YoungJRNY wrote:It's only a matter of time before Brady joins the invulnerable ranks of Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw with QB's with 4 rings. Hell, if it wasn't for ONE play in '07 & '11, Brady arguably has 5 rings right now. That team is the best coached team I've ever seen and punk's everybody who dares to enter their football stadium. I'd be shocked not to see them representing the AFC this year.
I know that you can't help yourself, but PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE don't put Tom Brady and Terry Bradshaw in the same sentence. You weren't born when Bradshaw played. I saw the guy play. It's not close between him and Brady. He wasn't half the QB Tom Brady is. I don't care if Bradshaw had 15 rings. The guy simpy wasn't that good. Anyone alive at that time knows that I could have been the QB of those Steelers teams (and I was 10) and they still would have won those Super Bowls!
Liam wrote:So much for a GOOD MNF game. Pats raped a JV high school team last night.![]()
DavidWT wrote:Does anyone know why it's the "New England" Patriots? Other teams represent individual cities, but the Pats represent an entire region of the country. Just seems odd to me. Why not "The Foxboro Patriots"?
Enigma869 wrote:DavidWT wrote:Does anyone know why it's the "New England" Patriots? Other teams represent individual cities, but the Pats represent an entire region of the country. Just seems odd to me. Why not "The Foxboro Patriots"?
I'm still trying to figure out why the Jets and Giants are the "New York" Giants and Jets, given that neither team plays in the state of NY!
Enigma869 wrote: I'm still trying to figure out why the Jets and Giants are the "New York" Giants and Jets, given that neither team plays in the state of NY!
Enigma869 wrote:DavidWT wrote:Does anyone know why it's the "New England" Patriots? Other teams represent individual cities, but the Pats represent an entire region of the country. Just seems odd to me. Why not "The Foxboro Patriots"?
Not really any more complicated than someone liked the name more than the Boston Patriots (which was the original team name). They would certainly never be the Foxboro Patriots any more than any more the Lakers would be the Ingelwood (they don't play in Los Angeles) Lakers. I'm still trying to figure out why the Jets and Giants are the "New York" Giants and Jets, given that neither team plays in the state of NY!
DavidWT wrote:@Jonny-- Love that album in your avatar, btw. Just got it the other day.
Jonny B wrote:DavidWT wrote:@Jonny-- Love that album in your avatar, btw. Just got it the other day.
@DavidWT -- Yea, it is a decent album. Not the best album in general, but some of the songs are IMO the best they've done. My car broke down the day before the Palladium show so I couldn't so see them live...and then they axed Anette 3 concerts later. It bummed me out knowing I won't be able to see that era of Nightwish in show anymore.
DavidWT wrote:Jonny B wrote:DavidWT wrote:@Jonny-- Love that album in your avatar, btw. Just got it the other day.
@DavidWT -- Yea, it is a decent album. Not the best album in general, but some of the songs are IMO the best they've done. My car broke down the day before the Palladium show so I couldn't so see them live...and then they axed Anette 3 concerts later. It bummed me out knowing I won't be able to see that era of Nightwish in show anymore.
It's the only NW album I have. Actually, I picked it up on a whim when I saw it at the local library, not really knowing anything about it or about NW in general.
Jonny B wrote:So back on topic, I'm glad I changed my Monday pick. If this is how the Texans perpare for 'big games' come playoff time, they could be in trouble.![]()
...
Here's a discussion question. I'm thinking at the rate things are going, Alex Smith, Matt Flynn, and Mike Vick, could be available for sign/trade next year. Do they get new jobs elsewhere, and which teams are the best fit? Also, does Vince Young get a starting job next year?
Jonny B wrote:So back on topic, I'm glad I changed my Monday pick. If this is how the Texans perpare for 'big games' come playoff time, they could be in trouble.![]()
...
Here's a discussion question. I'm thinking at the rate things are going, Alex Smith, Matt Flynn, and Mike Vick, could be available for sign/trade next year. Do they get new jobs elsewhere, and which teams are the best fit? Also, does Vince Young get a starting job next year?
. GEnigma869 wrote:Jonny B wrote:So back on topic, I'm glad I changed my Monday pick. If this is how the Texans perpare for 'big games' come playoff time, they could be in trouble.![]()
...
Here's a discussion question. I'm thinking at the rate things are going, Alex Smith, Matt Flynn, and Mike Vick, could be available for sign/trade next year. Do they get new jobs elsewhere, and which teams are the best fit? Also, does Vince Young get a starting job next year?
Mike Vick sucks and has always sucked. No QB with less talent has received more publicity in the history of the NFL! Dude simply can't play.
RPM wrote:
I don't know, Tebow would give him a run for the money for that award!
Enigma869 wrote:While I don't disagree with your point, Tebow was one year worth of media-hyped BS. Vick has been a decade's worth, and I think they suck equally!
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests