

Moderator: Andrew
Andrew wrote:It’s not hard to see what people are focussed on if you read and have a lot of USA friends talking about it.
Memorex wrote:Andrew wrote:It’s not hard to see what people are focussed on if you read and have a lot of USA friends talking about it.
I don't believe that to be a correct statement. Liberals just talk more.
Andrew wrote:Memorex wrote:Andrew wrote:It’s not hard to see what people are focussed on if you read and have a lot of USA friends talking about it.
I don't believe that to be a correct statement. Liberals just talk more.
That’s hilarious. This board was a swap of RWNJs and their daily posts of loony websites and bile.
The latest defense came out Friday evening, when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a statement from an unidentified spokesman stating that information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to the president had demonstrated that “tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.” The advisories were dated from last Wednesday, Aug. 28, through Monday, the statement read.
The statement also said the Birmingham NWS tweet Sunday morning “spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.”
Memorex wrote:The latest defense came out Friday evening, when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a statement from an unidentified spokesman stating that information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to the president had demonstrated that “tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.” The advisories were dated from last Wednesday, Aug. 28, through Monday, the statement read.
The statement also said the Birmingham NWS tweet Sunday morning “spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.”
https://apnews.com/b77db47e44954ee4b4ab948c3d898d8d
Andrew wrote:Memorex wrote:The latest defense came out Friday evening, when the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration issued a statement from an unidentified spokesman stating that information provided by NOAA and the National Hurricane Center to the president had demonstrated that “tropical-storm-force winds from Hurricane Dorian could impact Alabama.” The advisories were dated from last Wednesday, Aug. 28, through Monday, the statement read.
The statement also said the Birmingham NWS tweet Sunday morning “spoke in absolute terms that were inconsistent with probabilities from the best forecast products available at the time.”
https://apnews.com/b77db47e44954ee4b4ab948c3d898d8d
This is just embarrassing and shameful. NOAA is headed by two Drumpf flunkies and goes against everything and everyone else to achieve a political point - the president is not a moron. Except the rest of the world has already made that judgement and moved on.
Andrew wrote:Ah, so I should have moved on instead of proving a point.
The ever present conundrum remains! How do you support a president who is completely unhinged?
verslibre wrote:I initially commented on "Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:24 pm" — when the news was fresh out of the pizza box. For that, you call(ed) me a bullshitter, liar, whatever.
verslibre wrote:You're exhibiting a "shoot the messenger" mentality — which is exactly what I'd expect from a RWNJ MAGAt, which you say you'e not.
verslibre wrote:Meanwhile, you continue to conjure every excuse imaginable for 45's antics like they're No. Big. Deal.
verslibre wrote: You fail to realize that If this was '09 and the same thing were happening, the Red Wavers of MR would be leading the charge to "rescue the WH from the 'Manchurian candidate'!" — platoons consisting of sofas stacked fifteen guys deep and being dragged behind an advance line of '72 Ford pickups. GIT-R-DONE!![]()
Andrew wrote:That’s hilarious. This board was a swap of RWNJs and their daily posts of loony websites and bile.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:verslibre wrote:I initially commented on "Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:24 pm" — when the news was fresh out of the pizza box. For that, you call(ed) me a bullshitter, liar, whatever.
Why does that matter? Alot of BS news has been posted fresh out of the pizza box on here.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Holding someone accountable for spreading bullshit has nothing to do with political affiliation.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:If the "antics" are not based in fact, then they deserve to be excused. Unrepentant liars like you are making the case for Trump daily.
The_Noble_Cause wrote:verslibre wrote: You fail to realize that If this was '09 and the same thing were happening, the Red Wavers of MR would be leading the charge to "rescue the WH from the 'Manchurian candidate'!" — platoons consisting of sofas stacked fifteen guys deep and being dragged behind an advance line of '72 Ford pickups. GIT-R-DONE!![]()
The political landscape of 2009 has nothing to do with 2019. Trump blew up the paradigm of traditional politics.
RPM wrote:Andrew wrote:Ah, so I should have moved on instead of proving a point.
The ever present conundrum remains! How do you support a president who is completely unhinged?
Your the one who said everyone has moved on...however you did state you only post in this thread for your
own amusement, so lets keep you amused shall we?
President Trump wants the Chinese 2 to stop stealing our intellectual property. (horrifying I know)
President Trump wants the Southern border protected from people illegally entering our country ( disgraceful!)
President Trump want Russia to abide by the treaty they signed ( what gall)
President Trump wants NATO to pay there fair share for their protection (2% gdp) yeah he is really of the rails...
Oh but what about him drawing on a map .....yeah whatever...
verslibre wrote:RPM wrote:Andrew wrote:Ah, so I should have moved on instead of proving a point.
The ever present conundrum remains! How do you support a president who is completely unhinged?
Your the one who said everyone has moved on...however you did state you only post in this thread for your
own amusement, so lets keep you amused shall we?
President Trump wants the Chinese 2 to stop stealing our intellectual property. (horrifying I know)
President Trump wants the Southern border protected from people illegally entering our country ( disgraceful!)
President Trump want Russia to abide by the treaty they signed ( what gall)
President Trump wants NATO to pay there fair share for their protection (2% gdp) yeah he is really of the rails...
Oh but what about him drawing on a map .....yeah whatever...
45 can hang his ego on his coatrack and stop fueling the commentary on Sharpiegate himself, and I can find a pot o' gold at the end of a rainbow.
verslibre wrote:And when it's new, it new. That was a pretty sad headline to read when it was first sprung. Not sure what you do on a daily basis, but I saw it while I was working, hence my comment. Take a chill pill, Miller.
verslibre wrote:Except it was anything but. There are only a few of us who even bother with this thread (myself mainly for laughs, to see what you and RPM and Memorex are saying), and that doesn't qualify as "spreading" anything. You must be a really popular guy in your bullpen.
verslibre wrote:When a guy holds the highest office in the land, nothing "deserves" to be excused. That's why he, like his predecessors, are under the utmost scrutiny.
verslibre wrote:You missed the point, that's all.
RPM wrote:That coatrack must be “ Huge”.....
“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.”
Andrew wrote:The ever present conundrum remains! How do you support a president who is completely unhinged?
Andrew wrote:Ah, so I should have moved on instead of proving a point.
The ever present conundrum remains! How do you support a president who is completely unhinged?
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:That’s hilarious. This board was a swap of RWNJs and their daily posts of loony websites and bile.
The looniest thing ever promoted of this board was Russiagate and Trump pedophile conspiracies - neither came from the RWNJS.
Andrew wrote:The_Noble_Cause wrote:Andrew wrote:That’s hilarious. This board was a swap of RWNJs and their daily posts of loony websites and bile.
The looniest thing ever promoted of this board was Russiagate and Trump pedophile conspiracies - neither came from the RWNJS.
And neither has been resolved.
verslibre wrote:They had no problem commencing impeachment proceedings for Bill, for "lying under oath" and "obstruction of justice."
I wonder what's taking so long with the new guy...
verslibre wrote:They had no problem commencing impeachment proceedings for Bill, for "lying under oath" and "obstruction of justice."
I wonder what's taking so long with the new guy...
Memorex wrote:verslibre wrote:They had no problem commencing impeachment proceedings for Bill, for "lying under oath" and "obstruction of justice."
I wonder what's taking so long with the new guy...
He would have had to of lied under oath or obstruct justice, I guess. And since that has not occurred, the appetite, even among Democrats for impeachment is very low. They ought to just find someone with some policies they agree with and try to win an election.
RPM wrote:Andrew wrote:
And neither has been resolved.
Yeah they should investigate that Russia thing....maybe even get a respected special prosecutor...
The_Noble_Cause wrote:Tom Steyer's inclusion in the Democratic debates is pathetic. This guy represents astroturf pay-to-play politics at its worst. The DNC bars candidates with actual grassroots support,(like Mike Grave and Tulsi Gabbard), but let's this hedge fund billionaire asshole in?
Return to Snowmobiles For The Sahara
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests